Development of the meshless finite volume particle method with exact and efficient calculation of interparticle area

Abstract The Finite Volume Particle Method (FVPM) is a meshless method based on a definition of interparticle area which is closely analogous to cell face area in the classical finite volume method. In previous work, the interparticle area has been computed by numerical integration, which is a source of error and is extremely expensive. We show that if the particle weight or kernel function is defined as a discontinuous top-hat function, the particle interaction vectors may be evaluated exactly and efficiently. The new formulation reduces overall computational time by a factor between 6.4 and 8.2. In numerical experiments on a viscous flow with an analytical solution, the method converges under all conditions. Significantly, in contrast with standard FVPM and SPH, error depends on particle size but not on particle overlap (as long as the computational domain is completely covered by particles). The new method is shown to be superior to standard FVPM for shock tube flow and inviscid steady transonic flow. In benchmarking on a viscous multiphase flow application, FVPM with exact interparticle area is shown to be competitive with a mesh-based volume-of-fluid solver in terms of computational time required to resolve the structure of an interface.

[1]  Damien Violeau,et al.  Fluid Mechanics and the SPH Method: Theory and Applications , 2012 .

[2]  M. Lastiwka,et al.  Truncation error in mesh‐free particle methods , 2006 .

[3]  K. Steiner,et al.  A FINITE-VOLUME PARTICLE METHOD FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS , 2000 .

[4]  Antony Jameson,et al.  A Comparison of Various Meshless Schemes Within a Unified Algorithm , 2009 .

[5]  G. Taylor,et al.  Mechanism of the production of small eddies from large ones , 1937 .

[6]  David Le Touzé,et al.  An Hamiltonian interface SPH formulation for multi-fluid and free surface flows , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  Mihai Basa,et al.  Permeable and non‐reflecting boundary conditions in SPH , 2009 .

[8]  J. Monaghan Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Its Diverse Applications , 2012 .

[9]  Dietmar Hietel,et al.  A projection technique for incompressible flow in the meshless finite volume particle method , 2005, Adv. Comput. Math..

[10]  Nathan J. Quinlan,et al.  Fast exact evaluation of particle interaction vectors in the finite volume particle method , 2011 .

[11]  J. Bonet,et al.  Variational and momentum preservation aspects of Smooth Particle Hydrodynamic formulations , 1999 .

[12]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Nonreflecting boundary conditions for Euler equation calculations , 1990 .

[13]  S. Cummins,et al.  An SPH Projection Method , 1999 .

[14]  Jens Struckmeier,et al.  A finite‐volume particle method for conservation laws on moving domains , 2008 .

[15]  T. Ismagilov,et al.  Smooth volume integral conservation law and method for problems in Lagrangian coordinates , 2006 .

[16]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  A sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM+-up for all speeds , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  Jens Struckmeier,et al.  Consistency analysis of mesh-free methods for conservation laws , 2001 .

[18]  M. Trujillo,et al.  Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interFoam , 2012 .

[19]  H. Rusche Computational fluid dynamics of dispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions , 2003 .

[20]  M. Junk Do Finite Volume Methods Need a Mesh , 2003 .

[21]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[22]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  A constant-density approach for incompressible multi-phase SPH , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  M. Junk,et al.  The Finite-Volume-Particle Method for Conservation Laws , 2001 .

[24]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  An incompressible multi-phase SPH method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[25]  V. Springel E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh , 2009, 0901.4107.

[26]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  In Pursuit of Grid Convergence for Two-Dimensional Euler Solutions , 2009 .

[27]  Nathan J. Quinlan,et al.  Extension of the finite volume particle method to viscous flow , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[28]  Dietmar Hietel,et al.  Consistency by Coefficient-Correction in the Finite-Volume-Particle Method , 2003 .

[29]  P. Español,et al.  Voronoi Fluid Particle Model for Euler Equations , 2005 .

[30]  Timothy J. Barth,et al.  The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes , 1989 .

[31]  P. Koumoutsakos MULTISCALE FLOW SIMULATIONS USING PARTICLES , 2005 .

[32]  M. Liou A Sequel to AUSM , 1996 .