Precise background subtraction in stimulated emission double depletion nanoscopy.

Low-resolution background in stimulated emission depletion (STED) nanoscopy can arise from incomplete depletion or re-excitation by the STED beam. We have recently introduced stimulated emission double depletion (STEDD), a technique to efficiently suppress this background. In STEDD, the conventional, doughnut-shaped STED pulse, which depletes excited fluorophores outside the center of the focal region, is followed by a second Gaussian STED pulse, which specifically depletes the central region. The background is removed by calculating a weighted difference of photon events collected before and after the second STED pulse. Here, we present a simple, yet powerful, method to determine the weight factor, which depends on the fluorescence decay, from a direct analysis of the acquired data. We vary the weight factor to identify its optimal value as the one for which the weight of high-frequency components in the spectrum of the acquired STEDD image is maximized. This strategy is also applicable to other differential approaches for background suppression in imaging.

[1]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Focal modulation microscopy with annular apertures: A numerical study , 2010, Journal of biophotonics.

[2]  G Ulrich Nienhaus,et al.  Where Do We Stand with Super-Resolution Optical Microscopy? , 2016, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  S. Hell,et al.  Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. , 1994, Optics letters.

[4]  S. Hell Far-Field Optical Nanoscopy , 2007, Science.

[5]  Giuseppe Vicidomini,et al.  STED with wavelengths closer to the emission maximum. , 2012, Optics express.

[6]  Giuseppe Vicidomini,et al.  STED Nanoscopy with Time-Gated Detection: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  A new filtering technique for removing anti‐Stokes emission background in gated CW‐STED microscopy , 2014, Journal of biophotonics.

[8]  Y. Ishitsuka,et al.  Monomeric Garnet, a far-red fluorescent protein for live-cell STED imaging , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[10]  Frederik Görlitz,et al.  STED nanoscopy with fluorescent quantum dots , 2015, Nature Communications.

[11]  Christian Eggeling,et al.  Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy in subdiffraction focal volumes. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[12]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  Frequency dependent detection in a STED microscope using modulated excitation light. , 2013, Optics express.

[13]  L. V. Doronina-Amitonova,et al.  Ultrahigh-contrast imaging by temporally modulated stimulated emission depletion. , 2015, Optics letters.

[14]  S. Hell,et al.  STED nanoscopy with wavelengths at the emission maximum , 2016 .

[15]  S. Hell,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with a total internal reflection fluorescence STED microscope (TIRF-STED-FCS). , 2012, Optics express.

[16]  J Mertz,et al.  Enhanced background rejection in thick tissue with differential-aberration two-photon microscopy. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  Multi-images deconvolution improves signal-to-noise ratio on gated stimulated emission depletion microscopy , 2014 .

[18]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  4Pi-RESOLFT nanoscopy , 2016, Nature Communications.

[19]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  Encoding and decoding spatio-temporal information for super-resolution microscopy , 2015, Nature Communications.