Assessing the sustainability of decentralized renewable energy systems: A comprehensive framework with analytical methods

The number of models of Decentralized Renewable Energy (DRE) systems, particularly for rural electrification, is growing globally. Most approaches to assess the sustainability of these solutions beyond simple techno-economic considerations are comparative in nature, and only allow us to evaluate performance within a set of other interventions. This leaves a gap in our understanding of the conditions for a specific model to be sustainable and whether its replication is likely to succeed. The approach suggested develops a framework to evaluate the sustainability of specific models for energy access individually and proposes analytical methods to illustrate its use. It combines the multi-dimensional analysis over five sustainability dimensions and the Multi-Tier Framework (MTF) to assess technical sustainability, extending MTF’s rigorous scoring methodology to the other dimensions. The scores are based on qualitative and quantitative data collected from key stakeholders, taking into account different perspectives and aims. The framework and analytical methods are exemplified using a subset of data collected in over 40 off-grid DRE systems utilizing a common community ownership and hybrid financial structure. The proposed methodology can be used to understand the sustainability conditions of a given approach to energy access and can therefore be used by practitioners and policy makers to develop strategies and guide policies to roll out effective solutions.

[1]  Debajit Palit,et al.  The Solar Transitions research on solar mini-grids in India: Learning from local cases of innovative socio-technical systems , 2011 .

[2]  H. Bressers,et al.  Understanding Stakeholders’ Views and the Influence of the Socio-Cultural Dimension on the Adoption of Solar Energy Technology in Lebanon , 2018 .

[3]  A. Chaurey,et al.  Off-grid rural electrification experiences from South Asia: Status and best practices , 2011 .

[4]  Till Bunsen,et al.  Facilitating energy transition through energy commons: An application of socio-ecological systems framework for integrated community energy systems , 2018 .

[5]  Elisabeth Ilskog,et al.  And then they lived sustainably ever after?--Assessment of rural electrification cases by means of indicators , 2008 .

[6]  I. Nygaard,et al.  The compatibility of rural electrification and promotion of low-carbon technologies in developing countries - the case of Solar PV for Sub-Saharan Africa , 2009 .

[7]  Amulya K. N. Reddy,et al.  Energy for the New Millennium , 2001, Ambio.

[8]  Sheila Oparaocha,et al.  Gender and energy for sustainable development , 2011 .

[9]  P Grunewald,et al.  The use of Indicators for the monitoring and evaluation of knowledge management and knowledge brokering in international development. Report of a workshop held at the Institute for Development Studies 8th March 2013. , 2013 .

[10]  Karthik Ganesan,et al.  Factors affecting household satisfaction with electricity supply in rural India , 2016, Nature Energy.

[11]  D. Kammen,et al.  Community-Based Electric Micro-Grids Can Contribute to Rural Development: Evidence from Kenya , 2009 .

[12]  Andreas C. Goldthau,et al.  Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism , 2014 .

[13]  Elisabeth Ilskog,et al.  Indicators for assessment of rural electrification--An approach for the comparison of apples and pears , 2008 .

[14]  R. C. Neudoerffer.  Participatory rural energy planning in India — a policy context , 2002 .

[15]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Review of Alternative Methodologies for Analysing Off-Grid Electricity Supply , 2011 .

[16]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  The trials and tribulations of the Village Energy Security Programme (VESP) in India , 2013 .

[17]  Patrick Bayer,et al.  Does basic energy access generate socioeconomic benefits? A field experiment with off-grid solar power in India , 2017, Science Advances.

[18]  Debajit Palit,et al.  Approach for standardization of off-grid electrification projects , 2009 .

[19]  H. Heinrichs,et al.  Are the Rural Electrification Efforts in the Ecuadorian Amazon Sustainable , 2016 .

[20]  Iain MacGill,et al.  Addressing some issues relating to hybrid mini grid failures in Fiji , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference: South Asia Satellite (GHTC-SAS).

[21]  Jonathan Cloke,et al.  Governance, decentralisation and energy: a critical review of the key issues , 2015 .

[22]  Wendy Annecke,et al.  Monitoring and evaluation of energy for development: The good, the bad and the questionable in M&E practice , 2008 .

[23]  S. Feron.  Sustainability of Off-Grid Photovoltaic Systems for Rural Electrification in Developing Countries: A Review , 2016 .

[24]  Ed Brown,et al.  Imagining renewable energy: Towards a Social Energy Systems approach to community renewable energy projects in the Global South , 2017 .

[25]  S. Bhattacharyya.  Energy access programmes and sustainable development: A critical review and analysis , 2012 .

[26]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  The social value of mid-scale energy in Africa: Redefining value and redesigning energy to reduce poverty , 2015 .

[27]  Debajit Palit,et al.  Socio-technical assessment of solar photovoltaic systems implemented for rural electrification in selected villages of Sundarbans region of India , 2015 .

[28]  Helene Ahlborg,et al.  Rethinking the sustainability and institutional governance of electricity access and mini-grids: Electricity as a common pool resource , 2018 .

[29]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  The socio-technical barriers to Solar Home Systems (SHS) in Papua New Guinea: "Choosing pigs, prostitutes, and poker chips over panels" , 2011 .

[30]  Jennifer Davis,et al.  Does User Participation Lead to Sense of Ownership for Rural Water Systems? Evidence from Kenya , 2012 .