Non-destructive evaluation of an internal adaptation of resin composite restoration with swept-source optical coherence tomography and micro-CT.

Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and micro-CT can be useful non-destructive methods for evaluating internal adaptation. There is no comparative study evaluating the two methods in the assessment of internal adaptation in composite restoration. The purpose of this study was to compare internal adaptation measurements of SS-OCT and micro-CT. Two cylindrical cavities were created on the labial surface of twelve bovine incisors. The 24 cavities were randomly assigned to four groups of dentin adhesives: (1) three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, (2) two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, (3) two-step self-etch adhesive, and (4) one-step self-etch adhesive. After application, the cavities were filled with resin composite. All restorations underwent a thermocycling challenge, and then, eight SS-OCT images were taken using a Santec OCT-2000™ (Santec Co., Komaki, Japan). The internal adaptation was also evaluated using micro-CT (Skyscan, Aartselaar, Belgium). The image analysis was used to calculate the percentage of defective spot (%DS) and compare the results. The groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with Duncan analysis at the 95% significance level. The SS-OCT and micro-CT measurements were compared with a paired t-test, and the relationship was analyzed using a Pearson correlation test at the 95% significance level. The %DS results showed that Group 3≤Group 4<Group 1≤Group 2 on both SS-OCT and micro-CT images. The %DSs on micro-CT were lower than SS-OCT (p<0.05) and the Pearson correlation coefficient between SS-OCT and micro-CT was r=0.787 (p<0.05).

[1]  M. Okazaki,et al.  Comparative Study on Adhesive Performance of Functional Monomers , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[2]  Changhuei Yang,et al.  Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Optics express.

[3]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography , 1991 .

[4]  Alireza Sadr,et al.  Noninvasive cross-sectional visualization of enamel cracks by optical coherence tomography in vitro. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  L L Otis,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: a new imaging technology for dentistry. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  J. Bausch,et al.  Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  C. Youngson,et al.  Marginal leakage associated with three posterior restorative materials. , 1988, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  Alireza Sadr,et al.  Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  S. Park,et al.  Measurement of the internal adaptation of resin composites using micro-CT and its correlation with polymerization shrinkage. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[10]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  A. Mine,et al.  State of the art of self-etch adhesives. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  Hidehiko Sano,et al.  Micromorphological changes in resin-dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. , 1998, American journal of dentistry.

[14]  M. Hannig,et al.  Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. , 1999, Operative dentistry.

[15]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  W. D’hoore,et al.  Concise Review Biomaterials & Bioengineering: Meta-analytical Review of Factors Involved in Dentin Adherence , 2001, Journal of dental research.

[17]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Adhesion to and Decalcification of Hydroxyapatite by Carboxylic Acids , 2001, Journal of dental research.

[18]  B. Darvell,et al.  Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[19]  W. G. Matthews,et al.  Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. , 1995, Operative dentistry.

[20]  S. Heintze,et al.  Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers--comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[21]  A. Mine,et al.  Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  M. Otsuki,et al.  Non-destructive assessment of cavity wall adaptation of class V composite restoration using swept-source optical coherence tomography. , 2011, Dental materials journal.

[23]  Sung-Ho Park,et al.  Evaluation of internal adaptation of dental adhesive restorations using micro-CT , 2012 .

[24]  Tiegen Liu,et al.  Measurement of the refractive index of human teeth by optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[25]  F. Tay,et al.  State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  C. G. Toh,et al.  Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. , 1997, Operative dentistry.

[27]  B. Van Meerbeek,et al.  Hydrolytic Stability of Self-etch Adhesives Bonded to Dentin , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[28]  R. Hickel,et al.  Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[29]  N. Opdam,et al.  Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive Class I resin composite restorations. , 1996, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[30]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography , 1991, LEOS '92 Conference Proceedings.

[31]  Alireza Sadr,et al.  Validation of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[32]  D. Pashley,et al.  Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nanoleakage within the hybrid layer. , 1995, Operative dentistry.

[33]  Luigi Nicolais,et al.  A 3D analysis of mechanically stressed dentin-adhesive-composite interfaces using X-ray micro-CT. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[34]  Amir Nazari,et al.  Nondestructive assessment of current one-step self-etch dental adhesives using optical coherence tomography , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.