Comparing Paper and Software Tool for Participatory Design from Scratch

Several paper-based approaches and software tools have been developed to support Participatory Design (PD) in research and practice. However, a formal comparison of paper and software tool is missing in the PD literature. To address this gap we present an empirical study with 28 Informatics students comparing a paper-based approach with our digital tool PDotCapturer. Results show a slight advantage of paper regarding quantitative results and a significant statistical difference in one of the 18 qualities tested (regarding aesthetics [e.g. symmetrical, creative], usability [e.g. user control and freedom, flexibility and efficiency of use], and relevancy [appropriate or not]): designs created with the tool are more `Pleasant'. Subjectively the participants preferred paper for some of the activities and the tool for others. The results of our comparison show that the tool could be used instead of paper to benefit from some tool-advantages over paper (e.g. digital data gathering and analysis support).

[1]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[2]  Neema Moraveji,et al.  Comicboarding: using comics as proxies for participatory design with children , 2007, CHI.

[3]  Franck Poirier,et al.  Experimenting introductory tools for innovation and participatory design , 2010, PDC '10.

[4]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  FACIT PD: a framework for analysis and creation of intergenerational techniques for participatory design , 2013, CHI.

[5]  Elaine Byrne,et al.  Contextuality of participation in IS design: a developing country perspective , 2004, PDC 04.

[6]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[7]  Andy Dearden.  A Tool to Support Collaboration in Electronic Paper Prototyping , 2005 .

[8]  Dorina C. Gumm.  Distributed Participatory Design : An Inherent Paradoxon ? , 2006 .

[9]  Allison Druin,et al.  Mixing ideas: a new technique for working with young children as design partners , 2004, IDC '04.

[10]  Joan Greenbaum.  A Design of One’s Own: Towards Participatory Design in the United States , 2017 .

[11]  Andrew Warr,et al.  Distributed participatory design , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Nuno Jardim Nunes,et al.  Towards useful and usable interaction design tools: CanonSketch , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[13]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design , 2010, PDC '10.

[14]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The development of cooperation: five years of participatory design in the virtual school , 2000, DIS '00.

[15]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  A case for intergenerational distributed co-design: the online kidsteam example , 2015, IDC.

[16]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Taxonomy of PD Practices: A Brief Practitioner's Guide , 1993, Commun. ACM.

[17]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The myth of the paperless office , 2001 .

[18]  Kim Halskov,et al.  The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002-2012 , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  DENIM: An Informal Web Site Design Tool Inspired by Observations of Practice , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Erran Carmel,et al.  PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.

[21]  Steffen Lohmann,et al.  Involving End Users in Distributed Requirements Engineering , 2008, TAMODIA/HCSE.

[22]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning , 2014 .

[23]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[24]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  Layered elaboration: a new technique for co-design with children , 2010, CHI.

[25]  Andrew Clement,et al.  A retrospective look at PD projects , 1993, CACM.

[26]  Allison Druin,et al.  The Role of Children in the Design Technology , 1999 .

[27]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Participatory design and an eligibility screening tool , 2000, AMIA.

[28]  Janet C. Read,et al.  How Ideas make it through to Designs: Process and Practice , 2016, NordiCHI.

[29]  Allison Druin,et al.  Designing a digital library for young children , 2001, JCDL '01.

[30]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  DisCo: a co-design online tool for asynchronous distributed child and adult design partners , 2012, IDC '12.

[31]  Michael J. Muller.  PICTIVE—an exploration in participatory design , 1991, CHI.

[32]  Springer-Verlag London Limited.  Developing technology for autism: an interdisciplinary approach , 2012 .

[33]  Dag Svanæs,et al.  Putting the users center stage: role playing and low-fi prototyping enable end users to design mobile systems , 2004, CHI.

[34]  David G. Stork,et al.  Is paperless really more? , 2000, CACM.

[35]  Talya Porat,et al.  It's a Pleasure Buying Here: The Effects of Web-Store Design on Consumers' Emotions and Attitudes , 2011, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[36]  Adrian Holzer,et al.  Pdot: participatory design online tool , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[37]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[38]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Bluebells: a design method for child-centred product development , 2006, NordiCHI '06.