Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguish prestige from popularity

The number of citations is a widely used metric to evaluate the scientific credit of papers, scientists and journals. However, it does happen that a paper with fewer citations from prestigious scientists is of higher influence than papers with more citations. In this paper, we argue that from whom the paper is being cited is of higher significance than merely the number of received citations. Accordingly, we propose an interactive model on author-paper bipartite networks as well as an iterative algorithm to get better rankings for scientists and their publications. The main advantage of this method is twofold: (i) it is a parameter-free algorithm; (ii) it considers the relationship between the prestige of scientists and the quality of their publications. We conducted real experiments on publications in econophysics, and applied this method to evaluate the influences of related scientific journals. The comparisons between the rankings by our method and simple citation counts suggest that our method is effective to distinguish prestige from popularity.

[1]  Emmanuel J Favaloro,et al.  Measuring the quality of journals and journal articles: the impact factor tells but a portion of the story. , 2008, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[2]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities , 1979 .

[4]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[5]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Optimal ranking in networks with community structure , 2005 .

[6]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Ying Fan,et al.  Weighted networks of scientific communication: the measurement and topological role of weight , 2005 .

[8]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Citations: Indicators of significance? , 1989, Scientometrics.

[9]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods , 2005, Scientometrics.

[10]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Leaders in Social Networks, the Delicious Case , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  B. Frey,et al.  Do Rankings Reflect Research Quality? , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Yi Zhao,et al.  Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  M. Kendall.  A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[16]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Journal status , 2006, Scientometrics.

[17]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm , 2006, J. Informetrics.

[18]  Liang Gao,et al.  Network of Econophysicists: a weighted network to investigate the development of Econophysics , 2004 .

[19]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Googling Food Webs: Can an Eigenvector Measure Species' Importance for Coextinctions? , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Peter Taylor,et al.  Citation Statistics , 2009, ArXiv.

[21]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[22]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The difference between popularity and prestige in the sciences and in the social sciences: A bibliometric analysis , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[23]  D. Sin,et al.  Integrative Approach to Quality Assessment of Medical Journals Using Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, and Article Influence Scores , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  James Caverlee,et al.  PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[26]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[27]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Promise and Pitfalls of Extending Google's PageRank Algorithm to Citation Networks , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  E GARFIELD,et al.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. , 2006, Science.

[29]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  Information filtering via preferential diffusion , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  J. Hirsch.  Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Carl T. Bergstrom.  Eigenfactor Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals , 2007 .

[32]  H. Stanley,et al.  Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  How Citation Boosts Promote Scientific Paradigm Shifts and Nobel Prizes , 2011, PloS one.