Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation

Abstract This paper is a review of the role that urban vegetation plays in regard to human behavior and the perception of urban environments. This includes a review of the functions or benefits of urban vegetation to human use-economic benefits, instrumental or physiological functions and perceptual functions including visual, sensory benefits and symbolic aspects. The second part of the paper reviews the roles of urban vegetation in performing these various functions at different environmental scales and in different contexts. Finally, there is a review of means to assess change in the quality of urban vegetation in the environment as well as using vegetation to improve urban environmental perceptual quality.

[1]  James F. Palmer,et al.  Neighborhoods as stands in the urban forest , 1984 .

[2]  Rikard Küller,et al.  Utilizing an environmental simulation laboratory in Sweden , 1986 .

[3]  R. Ulrich Visual landscapes and psychological well‐being , 1979 .

[4]  Jane H. Lillydahl,et al.  The Effects of Greenbelts on Residential Property Values: Some Findings on the Political Economy of Open Space , 1978 .

[5]  R. Rowntree Ecology of the urban forest—Introduction to part II , 1984 .

[6]  Gary W. Evans,et al.  Assessment of Environmental Aesthetics in Scenic Highway Corridors , 1980 .

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The prediction of preference for unfamiliar urban places , 1982 .

[8]  L. Herrington TREES AND ACOUSTICS IN URBAN AREAS , 1974 .

[9]  R. Ulrich Natural Versus Urban Scenes , 1981 .

[10]  D. Relf Dynamics of horticultural therapy. , 1981, Rehabilitation literature.

[11]  Donald Appleyard,et al.  The View From the Road , 1965 .

[12]  Nickolaus R. Feimer Environmental perception: The effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample , 1984 .

[13]  The aesthetics of family housing: the residents' viewpoint , 1982 .

[14]  Gordon Cullen The Concise Townscape , 1971 .

[15]  Andrej Pogačnik A visual information system and its use in urban planning , 1979 .

[16]  Michael Hough City form and natural process: Towards a new urban vernacular , 1984 .

[17]  G. Wright,et al.  Appraisal of visual landscape qualities in a region selected for accelerated growth , 1974 .

[18]  Boyd Gibbons,et al.  The intimate sense of smell , 1986 .

[19]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Human Evaluations of Environmental Noise , 1976 .

[20]  T. Garling,et al.  The Structural Analysis of Environmental Perception and Cognition , 1976 .

[21]  R. Ulrich Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment , 1983 .

[22]  Richard C. Smardon,et al.  Commercial highway landscape reclamation: A participatory approach , 1986 .

[23]  George L. Peterson,et al.  A MODEL OF PREFERENCE: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PERCEPTION OF THE VISUAL APPEARANCE OF RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS , 1967 .

[24]  Donald Appleyard,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OF CITY STREETS: THE RESIDENTS' VIEWPOINT , 1972 .

[25]  Donald Appleyard,et al.  Streets of San Francisco: Brunswik's Lens Model Applied to Urban Inference and Assessment , 1980 .

[26]  Richard C Smardon,et al.  A VISUAL APPROACH TO REDESIGNING THE COMMERCIAL STRIP HIGHWAY , 1985 .

[27]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the impact of urbanization on scenic quality: land use change in the northeast , 1979 .

[28]  Henry F. Arnold Trees in urban design , 1980 .

[29]  L. Groat,et al.  Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task , 1982 .

[30]  Frances M. Carp,et al.  Dimensions of Urban Environmental Quality , 1976 .

[31]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Human Behavior and Environment , 1977, Springer US.

[32]  G. Buhyoff,et al.  Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements , 1984 .

[33]  J. Nasar Adult Viewers' Preferences in Residential Scenes , 1983 .

[34]  O. Gilbert,et al.  Urban Vegetation: A Review and Chicago Case Study. , 1975 .

[35]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Psychological and Recreational Benefits of a Residential Park. , 1981 .

[36]  R. Thayer,et al.  Plants, complexity, and pleasure in urban and suburban environments , 1978 .

[37]  Amos Rapoport,et al.  The Perception Of Urban Complexity , 1970 .

[38]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[39]  R. Ulrich View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. , 1984, Science.

[40]  Anne Whiston Spirn,et al.  The Granite Garden, Urban Nature and Human Design , 1984 .

[41]  Richard C. Smardon,et al.  Colour photocopy for visual simulation , 1985 .

[42]  Philip Thiel,et al.  The Role of Personality Differences in Judgments of Roadside Quality , 1969 .

[43]  Donald Appleyard,et al.  Annuaire des organizations Directory of Organizations , 1978 .

[44]  R. Kaplan Some Psycholog Ical Benefits of Gardening , 1973 .

[45]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Cognitive Maps and Urban Form , 1982 .

[46]  Robert E. Coughlin,et al.  The Effect of a Large Urban Park on Real Estate Value , 1974 .

[47]  S. Gold Nonuse of Neighborhood Parks , 1972 .

[48]  R. Ulrich Scenery and the shopping trip : the roadside environment as a factor in route choice , 1974 .

[49]  M. Southworth The Sonic Environment of Cities , 1969 .

[50]  W. Hendon,et al.  Land Values Adjacent to an Urban Neighborhood Park , 1967 .

[51]  Joseph H. Crystal,et al.  Measuring scenic quality at the urban fringe , 1978 .

[52]  W. Whyte The social life of small urban spaces , 1980 .