Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

OBJECTIVE Dual-energy CT has the potential to automatically remove calcified plaques from angiographic data sets. The objective of this study is to compare the accuracy of visual grading of stenoses after plaque removal with visual grading in standard reconstructions. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was used as a reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Twenty-five patients underwent dual-energy CT (140 kV and 80 mAs; 80 kV and 234 mAs) angiography and DSA. Plaque and bone removal was performed. Twenty-nine calcified stenoses were quantified using standard reconstructions, plaque and bone removal maximum intensity projections after plaque and bone removal, and DSA images, according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. The accuracy of the detection of relevant stenoses (> 70%) and occlusions was assessed. Correlation coefficients of the grades of stenoses with DSA were calculated. The influence of vessel enhancement on the accuracy of plaque removal was analyzed. RESULTS The average postprocessing time was 45 seconds. After plaque removal, all 25 relevant and four nonrelevant stenoses were correctly detected. Six relevant stenoses were overestimated as complete occlusions. With the standard reconstructions, two nonrelevant stenoses were overestimated as relevant. Correlation coefficients (r(2)) for the grading of stenoses after plaque removal and with standard reconstructions versus DSA were 0.7694 and 0.4329, respectively. Vessel contrast enhancement correlated weakly (r(2) = 0.2072) with the accuracy of plaque removal. CONCLUSION Dual-energy CT with plaque removal automatically delivers CT luminograms with a high sensitivity for the detection of relevant stenoses and a higher correlation to DSA than standard reconstructions but frequently leads to an overestimation of high-grade stenoses as occlusions. Thus, dual-energy CT plaque and bone removal should be used complementary to standard reconstructions, and not exclusively.

[1]  W. Hopfenmüller,et al.  Dual energy CT of peripheral arteries: effect of automatic bone and plaque removal on image quality and grading of stenoses. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[2]  P. Nederkoorn,et al.  Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease , 2004, Stroke.

[3]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dual-energy CT for the assessment of contrast material distribution in the pulmonary parenchyma. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Does dual-energy CT of lower-extremity tendons incur penalties in patient radiation exposure or reduced multiplanar reconstruction image quality? , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  C D Claussen,et al.  Automatic bone and plaque removal using dual energy CT for head and neck angiography: feasibility and initial performance evaluation. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[6]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Luca Saba,et al.  Multidetector-row CT angiography in the study of atherosclerotic carotid arteries , 2007, Neuroradiology.

[8]  P. Joseph,et al.  Noise considerations in dual energy CT scanning. , 1979, Medical physics.

[9]  A. McMahon,et al.  Subtraction helical CT angiography of intra- and extracranial vessels: technical considerations and preliminary experience. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  E. Klotz,et al.  Cervical CT Angiography Comparing Routine Noncontrast and a Late Venous Scan as Masks for Automated Bone Subtraction: Feasibility Study and Examination of the Influence of Patient Motion on Image Quality , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[12]  Maximilian F Reiser,et al.  Cervical and Cranial Computed Tomographic Angiography With Automated Bone Removal: Dual Energy Computed Tomography Versus Standard Computed Tomography , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Hiroaki Naito,et al.  Dual-energy direct bone removal CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysm or stenosis: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography , 2009, European Radiology.

[14]  Byoung Wook Choi,et al.  Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi- detector row CT coronary angiography. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  Hiroaki Naito,et al.  Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography , 2009, European Radiology.

[16]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[17]  K. Deng,et al.  Clinical evaluation of dual-energy bone removal in CT angiography of the head and neck: comparison with conventional bone-subtraction CT angiography. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[18]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Virtual elastic sphere processing enables reproducible quantification of vessel stenosis at CT and MR angiography. , 2011, Radiology.

[19]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[20]  J. Pell,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive tests--individual patient data meta-analysis. , 2009, Radiology.

[21]  B. Yeh,et al.  Dual-energy and low-kVp CT in the abdomen. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical Experience , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[23]  K. Yoshioka,et al.  Subtraction Coronary CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Severely Calcified Lesions Using a 320-Detector Row Scanner , 2011 .

[24]  S. C. Johnston,et al.  Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA , 2004, Neurology.

[25]  J W Sayre,et al.  Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography: Evaluation of Two Different Fully Automated Image-Registration Procedures for Interscan Motion Compensation , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[26]  Michael Gj.  Tissue analysis using dual energy CT. , 1992 .

[27]  J. Gillard,et al.  Noninvasive carotid artery imaging with a focus on the vulnerable plaque. , 2011, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[28]  W. Bautz,et al.  Clinical evaluation of bone-subtraction CT angiography (BSCTA) in head and neck imaging , 2006, European Radiology.