DNS of gas bubbles behaviour using an improved 3D front tracking model—Model development

In recent years CFD has proven to be a valuable and powerful tool to advance our understanding of complex multiphase flow systems arising in industrial applications. However, the predictive capabilities of this tool are determined by many factors of physical and numerical origin but in particular by the quality of the closures adopted for the description of the interface forces. The objective of this study is to improve the front tracking method in order to compute such forces with sufficient accuracy. This paper describes the further development of a 3D front tracking model to achieve improved volume conservation and circumvent problems related to the representation of surface tension. First, we have included a method to handle the pressure jump at the interface. This causes the spurious currents, observed in conventional front tracking, to decrease with two orders of magnitude. Also the advection scheme has been adapted, using higher order velocity interpolation (using cubic splines), and Runge–Kutta time-stepping, in order to prevent considerable volume changes of the dispersed phase. Test simulations involving a stationary bubble, a standard advection test and an oscillating droplet, demonstrate the effect of these improvements. The implementation of these procedures enlarged the computational window and in particular enabled the simulation of very small bubbles, where large surface forces dominate, without any significant spurious currents or volume loss.

[1]  J. Brackbill,et al.  A continuum method for modeling surface tension , 1992 .

[2]  G. Tryggvason,et al.  A front-tracking method for viscous, incompressible, multi-fluid flows , 1992 .

[3]  S. Zaleski,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FREE-SURFACE AND INTERFACIAL FLOW , 1999 .

[4]  Matthew W. Williams,et al.  A balanced-force algorithm for continuous and sharp interfacial surface tension models within a volume tracking framework , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  Wouter Dijkhuizen Deriving closures for bubbly flows using direct numerical simulations , 2008 .

[6]  Stéphane Popinet,et al.  A front-tracking algorithm for accurate representation of surface tension , 1999 .

[7]  W. Rider,et al.  Reconstructing Volume Tracking , 1998 .

[8]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Three-dimensional adaptive Cartesian grid method with conservative interface restructuring and reconstruction , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  Seungwon Shin,et al.  Modeling three-dimensional multiphase flow using a level contour reconstruction method for front tracking without connectivity , 2002 .

[10]  M. Uhlmann An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows , 2005, 1809.08170.

[11]  M. Renardy,et al.  PROST: a parabolic reconstruction of surface tension for the volume-of-fluid method , 2002 .

[12]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Navier-Stokes Numerical Algorithms for Free-Surface Flow Computations: An Overview , 2002 .

[13]  D. Juric,et al.  A front-tracking method for the computations of multiphase flow , 2001 .

[14]  C. Peskin Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart , 1977 .

[15]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Multi-scale modeling of dispersed gas-liquid two-phase flow , 2004 .

[16]  Luis Gustavo Nonato,et al.  A front-tracking/front-capturing method for the simulation of 3D multi-fluid flows with free surfaces , 2004 .

[17]  J. Centrella,et al.  Planar numerical cosmology. II. The difference equations and numerical tests , 1984 .

[18]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Numerical simulation of behavior of gas bubbles using a 3‐D front‐tracking method , 2006 .