Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface.

This study aimed to improve understanding of the mechanical aspects of cemented implant loosening. After aggressive fatigue loading of stem/cement/femur constructs, micro-cracks and stem/bone micro-motions were quantified to answer three research questions: Are cracks preferentially associated with the stem/cement interface, the cement/bone interface or voids? Is cement damage dependent on axial position? Does cement damage correlate with micro-motion between the stem and the bone? Eight Charnley Cobra stems were implanted in cadaveric femora. Six stem/cement/femur constructs were subjected to "stair-climbing" loads for 300 kcycles at 2Hz. Loads were normalized by construct stiffness to avoid fracture. Two additional constructs were not loaded. Transverse sections were cut at 10mm intervals, stained with a fluorescent dye penetrant and examined using epi-fluorescence stereomicroscopy. Crack lengths and cement areas were recorded for 9 sections per specimen. Crack length-density was calculated by dividing summed crack length by cement mantle area. To isolate the effect of loading, length-density data were offset by the baseline length-density measured in the non-loaded specimens. Significantly more cracks were associated with the interdigitated area (35.1%+/-11.6%) and the cement/bone interface (31.0%+/-6.2%) than with the stem/cement interface (11.0%+/-5.2%) or voids (6.1%+/-4.8%) (p<0.05). Load-induced micro-crack length-density was significantly dependent on axial position, increasing proximally (p<0.001). Micro-motions were small, all stems rotated internally. Cement damage did not correlate with micro-motion.

[1]  W J Maloney,et al.  The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Microdamage accumulation in the cement layer of hip replacements under flexural loading. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cement: Minimum Twenty-five-Year Follow-up* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Residual stress due to curing can initiate damage in porous bone cement: experimental and theoretical evidence. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  W. Maloney,et al.  Importance of a Thin Cement Mantle: Autopsy Studies of Eight Hips , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  D. Bartel,et al.  Cemented Femoral Stem Performance: Effects of Proximal Bonding, Geometry, and Neck Length , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  N Verdonschot,et al.  The effects of cement-stem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  HighWire Press,et al.  The journal of bone and joint surgery - British volume , 1948 .

[9]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Hip-joint and abductor-muscle forces adequately represent in vivo loading of a cemented total hip reconstruction. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Stem curvature and load angle influence the initial relative bone‐implant motion of cementless femoral stems , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Fatigue of cemented hip replacements under torsional loads , 1999 .

[12]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants? , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.