Substrate stiffness influences high resolution printing of living cells with an ink-jet system.

The adaptation of inkjet printing technology for the realisation of controlled micro- and nano-scaled biological structures is of great potential in tissue and biomaterial engineering. In this paper we present the Olivetti BioJet system and its applications in tissue engineering and cell printing. BioJet, which employs a thermal inkjet cartridge, was used to print biomolecules and living cells. It is well known that high stresses and forces are developed during the inkjet printing process. When printing living particles (i.e., cell suspensions) the mechanical loading profile can dramatically damage the processed cells. Therefore computational models were developed to predict the velocity profile and the mechanical load acting on a droplet during the printing process. The model was used to investigate the role of the stiffness of the deposition substrate during droplet impact and compared with experimental investigations on cell viability after printing on different materials. The computational model and the experimental results confirm that impact forces are highly dependent on the deposition substrate and that soft and viscous surfaces can reduce the forces acting on the droplet, preventing cell damage. These results have high relevance for cell bioprinting; substrates should be designed to have a good compromise between substrate stiffness to conserve spatial patterning without droplet coalescence but soft enough to absorb the kinetic energy of droplets in order to maintain cell viability.

[1]  Jonathan Bard,et al.  COLLAGEN SUBSTRATA FOR STUDIES ON CELL BEHAVIOR , 1972, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  M. Rein Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces , 1993 .

[3]  B. Derby,et al.  Delivery of human fibroblast cells by piezoelectric drop-on-demand inkjet printing. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[4]  L. McIntire,et al.  Mechanical effects on endothelial cell morphology: In vitro assessment , 1986, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology.

[5]  Sarit B. Bhaduri,et al.  Drop-on-demand printing of cells and materials for designer tissue constructs , 2007 .

[6]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular tensegrity : defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton , 2022 .

[7]  K. Barbee,et al.  Mechanisms of cell death and neuroprotection by poloxamer 188 after mechanical trauma , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[8]  D. Ingber Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.

[9]  R. Lal,et al.  Shear stress-induced reorganization of the surface topography of living endothelial cells imaged by atomic force microscopy. , 1994, Circulation research.

[10]  M Al-Rubeai,et al.  Estimation of disruption of animal cells by laminar shear stress , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  Chong Chen,et al.  Inkjet printing of laminin gradient to investigate endothelial cellular alignment. , 2009, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[12]  K. Barbee Mechanical Cell Injury , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Xiaofeng Cui,et al.  Application of inkjet printing to tissue engineering , 2006, Biotechnology journal.

[14]  U. Schubert,et al.  Inkjet printing of well-defined polymer dots and arrays. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[15]  James J. Feng,et al.  Deformation of a compound drop through a contraction in a pressure-driven pipe flow , 2008 .

[16]  David F Meaney,et al.  Mechanisms and consequences of neuronal stretch injury in vitro differ with the model of trauma. , 2006, Journal of neurotrauma.

[17]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Organ printing: promises and challenges. , 2008, Regenerative medicine.

[18]  Wei Sun,et al.  Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[19]  J. Sumerel,et al.  Piezoelectric ink jet processing of materials for medical and biological applications. , 2006, Biotechnology journal.

[20]  D Stamenović,et al.  A quantitative model of cellular elasticity based on tensegrity. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Ryoichi Matsuda,et al.  Growth Factor Array Fabrication Using a Color Ink Jet Printer , 2003, Zoological science.

[22]  M. Grujicic,et al.  Study of Impact-Induced Mechanical Effects in Cell Direct Writing Using Smooth Particle Hydrodynamic Method , 2008 .

[23]  Giovanni Vozzi,et al.  PAM2 (piston assisted microsyringe): a new rapid prototyping technique for biofabrication of cell incorporated scaffolds. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[24]  Stanislas Leibler,et al.  Printing Multistrain Bacterial Patterns with a Piezoelectric Inkjet Printer , 2007, PloS one.

[25]  N. Yamamoto,et al.  Microarray fabrication with covalent attachment of DNA using Bubble Jet technology , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Sawyer B. Fuller,et al.  A fast flexible ink-jet printing method for patterning dissociated neurons in culture , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  I. Morita,et al.  Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed seeding of individual living cells. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[28]  C. Meinhart,et al.  The flow structure inside a microfabricated inkjet printhead , 2000, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[29]  Bradley R Ringeisen,et al.  Jet‐based methods to print living cells , 2006, Biotechnology journal.

[30]  T. Boland,et al.  Inkjet printing for high-throughput cell patterning. , 2004, Biomaterials.