The Effects of Three Different Approaches on the Onset Time of Sciatic Nerve Blocks with 0.75% Ropivacaine

We studied three different injection techniques of sciatic nerve block in terms of block onset time and efficacy with 0.75% ropivacaine. A total of 75 patients undergoing foot surgery were randomly allocated to receive sciatic nerve blockade by means of the classic posterior approach (group classic; n = 25), a modified subgluteus posterior approach (group subgluteus; n = 25), or a lateral popliteal approach (group popliteal; n = 25). All blocks were performed with the use of a nerve stimulator (stimulation frequency, 2 Hz; intensity, 2–0.5 mA) and 30 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. Onset of nerve block was defined as complete loss of pinprick sensation in the sciatic nerve distribution with concomitant inability to perform plantar or dorsal flexion of the foot. In the three groups, an appropriate sciatic stimulation was elicited at <0.5 mA. The failure rate was similar in the three groups (group popliteal: 4% versus group classic: 4% versus group subgluteus: 8%). The onset of nerve block was slower in group popliteal (25 ± 5 min) compared with group classic (16 ± 4 min) and group subgluteus (17 ± 4 min; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the onset of nerve block between group classic and group subgluteus. No differences in the degree of pain measured at the first postoperative administration of pain medication were observed among the three groups. We conclude that the three approaches resulted in clinically acceptable anesthesia in the distribution of the sciatic nerve. The subgluteus and classic posterior approaches generated a significantly faster onset of anesthesia than the lateral popliteal approach.

[1]  I. Power,et al.  THE ACUTE ABDOMEN , 1954 .

[2]  R. McCarthy,et al.  Infragluteal-Parabiceps Sciatic Nerve Block: An Evaluation of a Novel Approach Using a Single-Injection Technique , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  L. Bertini,et al.  A New Posterior Approach to the Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison with the Classic Posterior Approach , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  A. Hadžić,et al.  The Division of the Sciatic Nerve in the Popliteal Fossa: Anatomical Implications for Popliteal Nerve Blockade , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  G. Fanelli,et al.  Ropivacaine or 2% Mepivacaine for Lower Limb Peripheral Nerve Blocks , 2000 .

[6]  D. Benhamou,et al.  The lateral approach to the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa: one or two injections? , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  S. Seguy,et al.  Interscalene brachial plexus analgesia after open shoulder surgery: continuous versus patient-controlled infusion. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  J. Tobias,et al.  Popliteal fossa block for postoperative analgesia after foot surgery in infants and children. , 1999, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[9]  G. Fanelli,et al.  Ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine for lower limb peripheral nerve blocks. Study Group on Orthopedic Anesthesia of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[10]  G. Fanelli,et al.  A Double-Blind Comparison of Ropivacaine, Bupivacaine, and Mepivacaine During Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Blockade , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  A. Hadžić,et al.  The intensity of the current at which sciatic nerve stimulation is achieved is a more important factor in determining the quality of nerve block than the type of motor response obtained. , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[12]  R. Buenaventura,et al.  Correlation between Evoked Motor Response of the Sciatic Nerve and Sensory Blockade , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[13]  P. Macaire,et al.  Dose‐Range Effects of Clonidine Added to Lidocaine for Brachial Plexus Block , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[14]  A. Hadžić,et al.  A Common Epineural Sheath for the Nerves in the Popliteal Fossa and Its Possible Implications for Sciatic Nerve Block , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[15]  P. Gleyze,et al.  Bloc interscalénique et chirurgie de l'épaule. Etude prospective d'une série continue de 167 patients , 1997 .

[16]  A. Hadžić,et al.  Anatomic Considerations for Sciatic Nerve Block in the Popliteal Fossa Through the Lateral Approach , 1996, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[17]  David H. W. Wong,et al.  Lateral popliteal sciatic nerve block compared with subcutaneous infiltration for analgesia following foot surgery , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[18]  W. L. Little,et al.  Sciatic Nerve Block: A Comparison of Single versus Double Injection Technique , 1989, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[19]  D. K. Rorie,et al.  Assessment of Block of the Sciatic Nerve in the Popliteal Fossa , 1980, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[20]  M. T. Jenkins,et al.  A New Single‐Position Supine Approach to Sciatic‐Femoral Nerve Block , 1975, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[21]  G. J. Romanes,et al.  Current Problems of Lower Vertebrate Phylogeny. , 1969 .

[22]  G. P. Beck.  Interior Approach to Sciatic Nerve Block , 1963 .

[23]  G. P. Beck.  Anterior approach to sciatic nerve block. , 1963, Anesthesiology.

[24]  K. Ichiyanagi.  SCIATIC NERVE BLOCK: LATERAL APPROACH WITH THE PATIENT SUPINE , 1959 .

[25]  G. Labat,et al.  Regional Anesthesia, Its Technique and Clinical Application , 1924, The Indian medical gazette.