Error Correction Model for the Service Company

Purpose of this applicative project research was the identification and analysis of the key performance indicators (KPIs’) which significantly contribute to the benefits of the business processes exploitation in the Port of Luka Koper, d. d. With this case study we attempted to get deeper understanding, and to clarify and evaluate the causalities between enablers and results. For this purpose we developed a single equation microeconomic Error Correction Model (ECM) with the Engle–Granger (1987) two step method. With the ECM approach we performed application on the KPIs and estimated short and long term effects between them. Final ECM indicates that that there is a lot of nonlinearity at the microeconomic level between KPIs and that a two step method should be used for the time series (KPIs) analyses at the microeconomic level and for forecasting. From the literature review is evident that this kind of approach is not used very often with exception for the macroeconomic level. Longterm framed qualitative and quantitative analyses indicate the benefit of the identificated KPIs’ and their influence on the fulfilment of the strategic directions.

[1]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[2]  Patricia K. Smith Welfare as a cause of poverty: A time series analysis , 1993 .

[3]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[4]  R. Easterlin,et al.  Application of Granger-Sims causality tests to monthly fertility data, 1958–1984 , 1988 .

[5]  A. Janeš Knowledge for the Right Strategy: Leading Role in the Cluster of Supply Companies , 2011 .

[6]  Nils-Göran Olve,et al.  Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard , 1999 .

[7]  J. Stock,et al.  Variable Trends in Economic Time Series , 1988 .

[8]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies , 2006 .

[9]  Developing Performance Indicators for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation , 1982 .

[10]  Ian Robson,et al.  From process measurement to performance improvement , 2004, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[11]  Slavko Dolinsek,et al.  Do we need a new compass for the journey through the global crisis , 2010 .

[12]  D. Hendry,et al.  Exploring Equilibrium Relationships in Econometrics through Static Models: Some Monte-Carlo Evidence , 2009 .

[13]  S. Hall An Application of the Granger & Engle Two-Step Estimation Procedure to United Kingdom Aggregate Wage Data , 2009 .

[14]  Francis D. Tuggle,et al.  Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes , 2004 .

[15]  Sven Modell,et al.  Bundling management control innovations: A field study of organisational experimenting with total quality management and the balanced scorecard , 2009 .

[16]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Measuring Your Way to Profit , 1994 .

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[18]  D. Larcker,et al.  Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[19]  Sai S. Nudurupati,et al.  Dynamics of performance measurement and organizational culture , 2006 .

[20]  Monetary Dynamics: An Application of Cointegration and Error-Correction Modeling , 1991 .

[21]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[22]  W. Brock,et al.  Growth empirics and reality , 2001 .

[23]  Peter R. Monge Theoretical and Analytical Issues in Studying Organizational Processes , 1990 .

[24]  R. Fritz,et al.  Linguistic Structure and Economic Method , 1985 .

[25]  Mik Wisniewski,et al.  Measuring performance in Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary with the Balanced Scorecard , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  Having Trouble with Your Strategy ? , 2005 .