Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on drug choice in a discrete-trials choice procedure

Rhesus monkeys were trained in a discretetrials choice procedure and allowed to choose between food delivery (1–16 pellets; 1 g/pellet) and intravenous injections of cocaine (0.03–0.56 mg/kg/injection;N=4) or procaine (1.0–10 mg/kg/injection;N=4) during daily 3-h sessions. Injections were available as the alternative to food. When the amount of food available as the alternative to drug was held constant and dose of drug was varied, the frequency of drug choice and total drug intake increased in a dose-related fashion for both cocaine and procaine. For both drugs, when the amount of food available as the alternative to drug was increased and the dose of the drug was held constant, the frequency of drug choice and total drug intake decreased. Thus, increases in the magnitude of an alternative non-drug reinforcer decreased cocaine and procaine self-administration. Further, the results suggest that while increasing the magnitude of the alternative reinforcer decreased the potency of cocaine as a positive reinforcer, the reinforcing efficacy of procaine was decreased. Because drug use by humans typically occurs in a context in which other reinforcers are available, the present results are consistent with the hypothesis that drug self-administration by humans can be decreased by increasing the value of alternative positive reinforcers. In addition, these results suggest that the extent to which drug self-administration is sensitive to this manipulation varies across drugs.

[1]  H. Fibiger,et al.  Extinction and recovery of cocaine self-administration following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[2]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Drug self-administration by laboratory animals: control by schedules of reinforcement. , 1978, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[3]  T. Aigner,et al.  Choice behavior in rhesus monkeys: cocaine versus food. , 1978, Science.

[4]  S. Dworkin,et al.  Reinforcer interactions under concurrent schedules of food, water, and intravenous cocaine , 1990, Behavioural pharmacology.

[5]  J. Katz,et al.  Models of relative reinforcing efficacy of drugs and their predictive utility. , 1990, Behavioural pharmacology.

[6]  M W Fischman,et al.  The pharmacology of cocaine related to its abuse. , 1989, Pharmacological reviews.

[7]  R. Balster,et al.  Reinforcing properties of intravenous procaine in rhesus monkeys , 1977, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[8]  C. Johanson The reinforcing properties of procaine, chloroprocaine and proparacaine in rhesus monkeys , 1980, Psychopharmacology.

[9]  C. Johanson The effects of electric shock on responding maintained by cocaine injections in a choice procedure in the rhesus monkey , 1977, Psychopharmacology.

[10]  C. Schuster,et al.  A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[11]  R. Meisch,et al.  Oral Drug Self-Administration: Drugs as Reinforcers , 1987 .

[12]  D. Cherek,et al.  Reinforcer interactions under concurrent schedules of food, water, and intravenous morphine , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[13]  C. Mitchell,et al.  The reinforcing properties of procaine and d-amphetamine compared in rhesus monkeys. , 1978, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[14]  C. Johanson Drugs as Reinforcers , 1978 .

[15]  R. Wise,et al.  Blockade of cocaine reinforcement in rats with the dopamine receptor blocker pimozide, but not with the noradrenergic blockers phentolamine or phenoxybenzamine. , 1977, Canadian journal of psychology.

[16]  T. Aigner,et al.  Comparison of the reinforcing properties of cocaine and procaine in rhesus monkeys , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[17]  R. Griffiths,et al.  Progressive-ratio performance maintained by drug infusions: Comparison of cocaine, diethylpropion, chlorphentermine, and fenfluramine , 1978, Psychopharmacology.

[18]  C. Schuster,et al.  The effects of chlorpromazine on psychomotor stimulant self-administration in the Rhesus monkey , 2004, Psychopharmacologia.

[19]  B. Tabakoff,et al.  Neurochemical correlates of tolerance and strain differences in the neurochemical effects of ethanol , 1983, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[20]  W. Woolverton Effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on the self-administration of cocaine and piribedil by Rhesus monkeys , 1986, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[21]  W. Woolverton,et al.  Behavioral pharmacology of local anesthetics: Reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects , 1982, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[22]  M. Stitzer,et al.  Reducing drug use among methadone maintenance clients: contingent reinforcement for morphine-free urines. , 1980, Addictive behaviors.

[23]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Contributions from behavioral theories of choice to an analysis of alcohol abuse. , 1988, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[24]  Fischman Mw,et al.  Cocaine self-administration in humans. , 1982 .

[25]  W. Woolverton,et al.  Effects of local anesthetics on fixed-interval responding in rhesus monkeys , 1983, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[26]  J. Woods,et al.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[27]  G. Koob,et al.  Disruption of cocaine self-administration following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the ventral tegmental area in rats , 1982, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[28]  T. Crowley Contingency contracting treatment of drug-abusing physicians, nurses, and dentists. , 1984, NIDA research monograph.

[29]  C. Johanson,et al.  Preference in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and d,l-cathinone. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Behavioral theories of choice as a framework for studying drinking behavior. , 1983, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[31]  R. Griffiths,et al.  Predicting the Abuse Liability of Drugs with Animal Drug Self-Administration Procedures: Psychomotor Stimulants and Hallucinogens , 1979 .

[32]  M. Carroll,et al.  Fluoxetine reduces intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats , 1990, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[33]  C. Schuster,et al.  Suppression of cocaine self-administration by extinction and punishment. , 1974, Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior.

[34]  T. Yanagita An experimental framework for evaluation of dependence liability of various types of drugs in monkeys. , 1973 .

[35]  R. Meisch,et al.  Food deprivation increases oral and intravenous drug intake in rats. , 1979, Science.

[36]  W. Woolverton,et al.  Effects of antipsychotic compounds in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and food. , 1981, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[37]  J. Mendelson,et al.  Buprenorphine suppresses cocaine self-administration by rhesus monkeys. , 1989, Science.

[38]  M. Stitzer,et al.  Oral methadone self‐administration: Effects of dose and alternative reinforcers , 1983, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[39]  M. Carroll,et al.  A concurrently available nondrug reinforcer prevents the acquisition or decreases the maintenance of cocaine-reinforced behavior , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[40]  M W Fischman,et al.  Cocaine self-administration in humans. , 1982, Federation proceedings.

[41]  J. Bergman,et al.  The effects of electric shock on responding maintained by cocaine in rhesus monkeys , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.