Variation in floral organ size depends on function: a test with Commelina communis, an andromonoecious species

We measured the size of floral organs in andromonoecious Commelina communis to test the hypothesis that pollinator-mediated selection might regulate variation in the size of floral organs. We compared variation in floral organ size between C. communis perfect flowers, with fertile pistils, and C. communis staminate flowers, with sterile pistils. We hypothesized that variation in size of the sexually functionless pistil would be large. We found supporting evidence from eight C. communis populations. These results suggest that pollinator-mediated selection may have stabilized variation in the style length of perfect flowers. We also found differences in variation in length among three different types of anthers in both perfect and staminate flowers, only two of which produce fertile pollen. This is consistent with our prediction that mating-related organs should vary less in size than attraction-related organs.

[1]  Akio Imamura,et al.  Large variation in flower size of the myco‐heterotrophic plant, Monotropastrum globosum: effect of floral display on female reproductive success , 2002 .

[2]  K. Matsui,et al.  Pollinator limitaton in a deceptive orchid, Pogonia japonica, on a floating peat mat , 2001 .

[3]  Kensuke Nakata,et al.  Evolution of Flower Allometry and Its Significance for Pollination Success in the Deceptive Orchid Pogonia japonica , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[4]  J. Thompson,et al.  Floral Display in Narcissus: Variation in Flower Size and Number at the Species, Population, and Individual Levels , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[5]  Jennifer L. Krstolic,et al.  Floral Symmetry and Its Influence on Variance in Flower Size , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[6]  P. Diggle The expression of andromonoecy in Solanum hirtum (Solanaceae) : phenotypic plasticity and ontogenetic contingency , 1994 .

[7]  L. Harder,et al.  Pollen Removal From Tristylous Pontederia Cordata: Effects of Anther Position and Pollinator Specialization , 1993 .

[8]  S. Mazer,et al.  Variation and covariation among floral traits within and among four species of northern European Primula (Primulaceae) , 1993 .

[9]  S. Via,et al.  PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC CORRELATIONS AMONG MORPHOLOGICAL AND LIFE‐HISTORY TRAITS IN WILD RADISH, RAPHANUS RAPHANISTRUM , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  Cryptic dioecy in flowering plants. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  C. Fenster Selection on floral morphology by hummingbirds , 1991 .

[12]  R. Wyatt,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR POLLINATION ECOTYPES IN THE YELLOW‐FRINGED ORCHID, PLATANTHERA CILIARIS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  C. Horvitz,et al.  TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SELECTION ON A FLORAL CHARACTER , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  C. Galen,et al.  POLLINATION IN FLORAL SCENT MORPHS OF POLEMONIUM VISCOSUM: A MECHANISM FOR DISRUPTIVE SELECTION ON FLOWER SIZE , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  P. Kevan,et al.  Pollination in a cryptically dioecious plant Decaspermum parviflorum (Lam.) A. J. Scott (Myrtaceae) by pollen‐collecting bees in Sulawesi, Indonesia , 1985 .

[16]  W. Haber,et al.  Evolution of dioecy in Saurauia (Dilleniaceae) , 1984 .

[17]  R. Cruden POLLEN‐OVULE RATIOS: A CONSERVATIVE INDICATOR OF BREEDING SYSTEMS IN FLOWERING PLANTS , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  G. Stebbins Adaptive Radiation of Reproductive Characteristics in Angiosperms, II: Seeds and Seedlings , 1971 .

[19]  V. Grant,et al.  Flower pollination in the phlox family , 1965 .

[20]  R. L. Berg,et al.  THE ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CORRELATION PLEIADES , 1960 .