Guidelines to measure individual feed intake of dairy cows for genomic and genetic evaluations

The widespread use of genomic information in dairy cattle breeding programs has presented the opportunity to select for feed intake and feed efficiency. This is because animals from research herds can be used as a reference population to calibrate a genomic prediction equation, which is then used to predict the breeding value for selection candidates based on their own genotype. To implement genomic prediction and perform genetic analysis for feed intake, several partners have brought together their expertise and existing feed intake records. Based on this experience we aim to provide some guidelines on the recording and handling of feed intake records. The consortium used a mixture of standardised experimental data coming from larger genetic experiments or several smaller nutritional studies. The latter has provided some statistical challenges. Also, data was combined across countries, experimental herds and feeding systems. Despite the perceived roughness of such data, it has proven to be very successful for genomic prediction, with proper statistical modelling. Ideally the whole lifetime of all cows should be measured, but this is unrealistic. Often, animals are recorded for part of one (or more) lactation(s) only. Guidelines on the proper statistical modelling and usefulness of existing data are needed. Selection index theory can help to establish the optimal recording period across and within lactation. It is also critical to identify how many records are required and what are the most informative animals for measuring feed intake. Genetic relationships with the selection candidates are an important criterion. Finally, since (residual) feed intake is only part of the breeding goal, it is important to consider recording of other traits as well, and the genetic parameters are needed to define the breeding goals properly.

[1]  K. Weigel,et al.  Genomic prediction of dry matter intake in dairy cattle from an international data set consisting of research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  K. Weigel,et al.  Heterogeneity in genetic and nongenetic variation and energy sink relationships for residual feed intake across research stations and countries. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  M. Calus,et al.  Genetic parameters across lactation for feed intake, fat- and protein-corrected milk, and liveweight in first-parity Holstein cattle. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  M. Calus,et al.  Genetic Parameters and Accuracy of recording Dry Matter Intake in first parity Holstein-Friesian cows , 2014 .

[5]  Bingjie Li Genetic Parameters for Dry Matter Intake at Different Lactation Stages among Primiparous Holstein, Jersey and Red Cows , 2014 .

[6]  M. Goddard,et al.  Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[7]  B. Hayes,et al.  Incorporating heifer feed efficiency in the Australian selection index using genomic selection. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  K. Weigel,et al.  Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  B. Hayes,et al.  Holstein-Friesian calves selected for divergence in residual feed intake during growth exhibited significant but reduced residual feed intake divergence in their first lactation. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  M. Calus,et al.  Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  K. Weigel,et al.  International genetic evaluations for feed intake in dairy cattle through the collation of data from multiple sources. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  C. V. Van Tassell,et al.  Use of residual feed intake in Holsteins during early lactation shows potential to improve feed efficiency through genetic selection. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[13]  S. König,et al.  Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architecture , 2013, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[14]  M. Calus,et al.  Improved accuracy of genomic prediction for dry matter intake of dairy cattle from combined European and Australian data sets. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  Rex D. Fernando,et al.  Genetic parameters for energy balance, feed efficiency, and related traits in Holstein cattle. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Merging and characterising phenotypic data on conventional and rare traits from dairy cattle experimental resources in three countries. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[17]  B. Hayes,et al.  Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250-day body weight in growing heifers using 625,000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  S. Davis,et al.  Measuring residual feed intake in dairy heifers fed an alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cube diet. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  B. Hayes,et al.  Variation in residual feed intake in Holstein-Friesian dairy heifers in southern Australia. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  E. Stamer,et al.  Short communication: genetic relationships among daily energy balance, feed intake, body condition score, and fat to protein ratio of milk in dairy cows. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Hans D. Daetwyler,et al.  Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach , 2008, PloS one.

[22]  G. C. Emmans,et al.  Genetic evaluation of dairy bulls for energy balance traits using random regression , 2001 .

[23]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  A covariance function for feed intake, live weight, and milk yield estimated using a random regression model. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle , 1999 .

[25]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic covariance functions for live weight, condition score, and dry-matter intake measured at different lactation stages of Holstein Friesian heifers , 1998 .

[26]  J. Arendonk,et al.  Genetic relationships between feed intake, efficiency and production traits in growing bulls, growing heifers and lactating heifers. , 1992 .

[27]  Robert W. Mayes,et al.  The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake , 1986, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[28]  M. Calus,et al.  Breeding Value for Dry Matter Intake for Dutch Bull based on Combination of DGV for DMI and EBV for Predictors , 2014 .

[29]  R. Veerkamp Liveweight and feed intake in dairy cattle breeding , 1996 .