Lacrimal Surgery Success After External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Functional and Anatomical Results Using Strict Outcome Criteria

Purpose: To present the results of external dacryocystorhinostomy (ext-DCR) for epiphora using strict outcome criteria and provide an accurate baseline and evidence from which to compare the results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: Retrospective case notes review of 158 consecutive adult patients who underwent primary ext-DCR. Functional success was assessed according to the patients’ symptoms and anatomical success was measured using objective tests of lacrimal system patency: 1) the functional endoscopic dye test and/or endoscopic endonasal inspection of the ostium; 2) syringing of the lacrimal system; and 3) the fluorescein dye retention test. Patients without complete follow-up data were recalled for clinical reevaluation. A minimum follow-up of 6 months was required. Comparison of overall functional and anatomical success was further analyzed according to etiology using logistic regression and for different grades of surgeon using the chi-squared test. Results: The results for 124 of 158 ext-DCRs showed an overall functional success of 69% and anatomical success of 74%. Patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) who had surgery by the specialist lacrimal surgeon had high success: 83% functional success and 100% anatomical success. Patients with watering eyes from non-PANDO aetiology including canalicular disease who had surgery by the specialist lacrimal surgeon had moderate success: 78% functional success and 70% anatomical success. The results of all surgery by trainees were lower but only significantly so for PANDO. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years (range, 6 months to 8.3 years); median follow-up was 1.9 years. Conclusion: This study used strict criteria to assess functional and anatomical outcomes of primary ext-DCR and thus provide baseline measures of success with a minimal follow-up of 6 months. When canalicular disease was excluded, results for PANDO were higher. Surgery performed by the specialist lacrimal surgeon had higher success rates than when performed by trainee.

[1]  P. Wormald,et al.  Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. , 2006, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[2]  S. H. Lee,et al.  Clinical Results of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy using a Microdebrider , 2006, Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO.

[3]  R. Schwarcz,et al.  External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[4]  K. Mansour,et al.  Long-Term Patient Satisfaction of External Dacryocystorhinostomy , 2005, Ophthalmologica.

[5]  G. Rose.  The lacrimal paradox: toward a greater understanding of success in lacrimal surgery. , 2004, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  P. Wormald,et al.  Mechanical Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy , 2004, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J M Olver,et al.  The success rates for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  R. Malhotra,et al.  A consideration of the time taken to do dacryo-cystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery , 2003, Eye.

[9]  Z. Currie.  Colour atlas of lacrimal surgery , 2003, Eye.

[10]  M. Kashkouli,et al.  Factors affecting the success of external dacryocystorhinostomy , 2003, Orbit.

[11]  P. Dolman.  Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Olver,et al.  Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Khooshabeh,et al.  Fluorescein Transit Test Time and Symptomatic Outcomes After External Dacryocystorhinostomy , 2002, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  S. Kaltreider,et al.  Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[15]  M. Duffy,et al.  Advances in lacrimal surgery. , 2000, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Olver,et al.  The value of nasal endoscopy after dacryocystorhinostomy. , 1999, Orbit.

[17]  J. Jacob,et al.  Dacryocystorhinostomy in South West England , 1998, Eye.

[18]  P. Custer,et al.  External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Surgical Success, Patient Satisfaction, and Economic Cost , 1995 .