A double-dissociation in infants' representations of object arrays

Previous studies show that infants can compute either the total continuous extent (e.g. Clearfield, M.W., & Mix, K.S. (1999). Number versus contour length in infants' discrimination of small visual sets. Psychological Science, 10(5), 408-411; Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2003). Tracking individuals via object-files: evidence from infants' manual search. Developmental Science, 6, 568-584) or the numerosity (Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2003). Tracking individuals via object-files: evidence from infants' manual search. Developmental Science, 6, 568-584) of small object arrays. The present experiments asked whether infants can compute both extent and number over a given array. Experiment 1 used a habituation procedure to show that 7-month-old infants can compute numerosity when the objects in the array contrast in color, pattern, and texture. Experiment 2 revealed that, with these heterogeneous arrays, infants no longer represent the array's total continuous extent. Since previous work shows that infants compute continuous extent but not numerosity when objects have identical rather than contrasting properties, these results form a double dissociation. Infants computed number but not extent over representations of contrasting objects, and computed extent but not number over representations of identical objects.

[1]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  P. Starkey,et al.  Perception of numbers by human infants. , 1980, Science.

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[5]  Renate Zangl,et al.  The Human First Hypothesis: Identification of Conspecifics and Individuation of Objects in the Young Infant , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  B. Scholl.  Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[7]  R. Rafal,et al.  Visual Extinction and Stimulus Repetition , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Spatial Repetition Blindness Is Modulated by Selective Attention to Color or Shape , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  S E Antell,et al.  Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. , 1983, Child development.

[11]  S. Carey,et al.  The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes , 2002, Psychological science.

[12]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Infant individuation and identification of objects , 2000 .

[14]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[15]  Lisa Feigenson,et al.  Tracking individuals via object-files: evidence from infants' manual search , 2003 .

[16]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[17]  T. Wilcox.  Object individuation: infants’ use of shape, size, pattern, and color , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  Susan Carey,et al.  What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge , 1999 .

[19]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Number Versus Contour Length in Infants' Discrimination of Small Visual Sets , 1999 .

[20]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[21]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory , 1965 .

[22]  S. Carey,et al.  On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays , 2005, Cognition.

[23]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Amount Versus Number: Infants' Use of Area and Contour Length to Discriminate Small Sets , 2001 .

[24]  T. Simon,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Origins of Number Knowledge: A "Non-Numerical" Account , 1997 .

[25]  M. Strauss,et al.  Infant perception of numerosity. , 1981, Child development.

[26]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[27]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[29]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn (1992) ☆ , 1995 .

[30]  Daniel P. Keating,et al.  Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. , 1983, Child development.

[31]  Susan Carey,et al.  Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[32]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .