Hierarchical Structuring of PPP Risks Using Interpretative Structural Modeling

Project risk management emphasizes the need to rank and prioritize risks in a project to focus the risk management efforts. This risk prioritization is of special significance in public-private partnership PPP projects, since project success depends upon the efficient allocation of risks to the party who can best manage it. Previous studies on risk identification and assessment of PPP project risks have only produced an unstructured list of such risks and prioritizing them on the basis of probability and impact. This paper suggests the use of interpretative structural modeling ISM to prepare a hierarchical structure as well as the interrelationships of these risks that would enable decision makers to take appropriate steps. MICMAC matrice d'impacts croises-multiplication applique a un classemen analysis is also done to determine the dependency and driving power of the risks. ISM, along with MICMAC analysis, provides a useful hierarchy of risks whose individual relationships are unambiguous but whose group relationships are too complex to organize intuitively and can help practitioners better understand risk dependencies and prioritize risk-mitigation efforts. This study identified 17 risks encountered during the development phase of PPP projects in Indian road sector and found that fourteen risks were weak drivers and weak dependents. Delay in financial closure, cost overrun risk, and time overrun risk have been found to have the highest dependence on other risks. The analysis can be extended by practitioners for risk analysis in other infrastructures such as railways, seaports, airports etc.

[1]  David Hillson,et al.  Use a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) to Understand Your Risks , 2002 .

[2]  R. Shankar,et al.  ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIONS AMONG THE BARRIERS OF REVERSE LOGISTICS , 2005 .

[3]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Implication Structures for System Interconnection Matrices , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  Sushil,et al.  The objectives of waste management in India: A futures inquiry , 1995 .

[5]  F. R. Janes,et al.  Interpretive structural modelling: a methodology for structuring complex issues , 1988 .

[6]  Sushil,et al.  Hierarchy and classification of program plan elements using interpretive structural modeling: A case study of energy conservation in the Indian cement industry , 1992 .

[7]  Robert J. Chapman,et al.  The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management , 2001 .

[8]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Development of a balanced scorecard , 2006 .

[9]  R. Shankar,et al.  Productivity improvement of a computer hardware supply chain , 2005 .

[10]  R. Flood Six scenarios for the future of systems “problem solving” , 1989 .

[11]  Shivraj Kanungo,et al.  A structured model for evaluating information systems effectiveness , 1999 .

[12]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[13]  Elim Liu,et al.  A structural component-based approach for designing product family , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[14]  George G. Lendaris,et al.  Structural Modeling a Tutorial Guide , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  On applications of interpretive structural modeling to higher education program planning , 1975 .

[16]  George G. Lendaris,et al.  The use of structural modeling for technology assessment , 1979 .

[17]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[18]  Neil N. Eldin Measurement of Work Progress: Quantitative Technique , 1989 .

[19]  E. Fontela,et al.  Using interpretive structural modelling in strategic decision‐making groups , 2005 .

[20]  Kumar Neeraj Jha,et al.  Modelling the risks faced by Indian construction companies assessing international projects , 2008 .

[21]  D. W. Malone,et al.  An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  R. Shankar,et al.  IT enablement of supply chains: modeling the enablers , 2004 .