River‐Aquifer Interactions, Geologic Heterogeneity, and Low‐Flow Management

Low river flows are commonly controlled by river-aquifer exchange, the magnitude of which is governed by hydraulic properties of both aquifer and aquitard materials beneath the river. Low flows are often important ecologically. Numerical simulations were used to assess how textural heterogeneity of an alluvial system influences river seepage and low flows. The Cosumnes River in California was used as a test case. Declining fall flows in the Cosumnes River have threatened Chinook salmon runs. A ground water-surface water model for the lower river basin was developed, which incorporates detailed geostatistical simulations of aquifer heterogeneity. Six different realizations of heterogeneity and a homogenous model were run for a 3-year period. Net annual seepage from the river was found to be similar among the models. However, spatial distribution of seepage along the channel, water table configuration and the level of local connection, and disconnection between the river and aquifer showed strong variations among the different heterogeneous models. Most importantly, the heterogeneous models suggest that river seepage losses can be reduced by local reconnections, even when the regional water table remains well below the riverbed. The percentage of river channel responsible for 50% of total river seepage ranged from 10% to 26% in the heterogeneous models as opposed to 23% in the homogeneous model. Differences in seepage between the models resulted in up to 13 d difference in the number of days the river was open for salmon migration during the critical fall months in one given year.

[1]  Robert W. Masters,et al.  Comparing statistical models of physical heterogeneity in buried‐valley aquifers , 2000 .

[2]  M. Sophocleous,et al.  Development of a Comprehensive Watershed Model Applied to Study Stream Yield under Drought Conditions , 1999 .

[3]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Heterogeneity in Sedimentary Deposits: A Review of Structure‐Imitating, Process‐Imitating, and Descriptive Approaches , 1996 .

[4]  M. Tabidian,et al.  IMPACT OF IRRIGATION WELLS ON BASEFLOW OF THE BIG BLUE RWER, NEBRASKA1 , 1995 .

[5]  Antonis D. Koussis,et al.  Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration , 1995 .

[6]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1984 .

[7]  G. M. Kondolf,et al.  Effects of bank storage and well pumping on base flow, Carmel River, Monterey County, California , 1987 .

[8]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Multi-scale alluvial fan heterogeneity modeled with transition probability geostatistics in a sequence stratigraphic framework , 1999 .

[9]  Steven F. Carle,et al.  Three‐dimensional hydrofacies modeling based on soil surveys and transition probability geostatistics , 1999 .

[10]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process , 2000 .

[11]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[12]  G. de Marsily,et al.  Some current methods to represent the heterogeneity of natural media in hydrogeology , 1998 .

[13]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Role of Molecular Diffusion in Contaminant Migration and Recovery in an Alluvial Aquifer System , 2001 .

[14]  A. Miall The Geology of Fluvial Deposits: Sedimentary Facies, Basin Analysis, and Petroleum Geology , 1996 .

[15]  三浦 省五,et al.  Oral Communication , 2007 .

[16]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  Development and application of a comprehensive simulation model to evaluate impacts of watershed structures and irrigation water use on streamflow and groundwater: the case of Wet Walnut Creek Watershed, Kansas, USA , 2000 .

[17]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Groundwater Flow and Sand Body Interconnectedness in a Thick, Multiple-Aquifer System , 1986 .

[18]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Model development for conjunctive use study of the San Jacinto Basin, California , 1995 .

[19]  P. Domenico,et al.  Physical and chemical hydrogeology , 1990 .

[20]  Ricardo Harboe,et al.  Multistep Planning Model for Conjunctive Use of Surface‐ and Ground‐Water Resources , 1991 .

[21]  W. Woessner Stream and Fluvial Plain Ground Water Interactions: Rescaling Hydrogeologic Thought , 2000 .

[22]  G. Fogg,et al.  Dispersion of groundwater age in an alluvial aquifer system , 2002 .

[23]  Michael L. Anderson,et al.  Managing Surface Water-Groundwater to Restore Fall Flows in the Cosumnes River , 2004 .

[24]  Steven F. Carle,et al.  CONDITIONAL SIMULATION OF HYDROFACIES ARCHITECTURE: A TRANSITION PROBABILITY/MARKOV APPROACH1 , 1998 .

[25]  M. C. Hill,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model -Documentation of the Hydrogeologic-Unit Flow (HUF) Package , 2000 .

[26]  D. Dudley Williams,et al.  Factors controlling riffle‐scale hyporheic exchange flows and their seasonal changes in a gaining stream: A three‐dimensional groundwater flow model , 2003 .

[27]  Roger E. Smith Approximate Soil Water Movement by Kinematic Characteristics1 , 1983 .

[28]  Edward R. Banta,et al.  A new streamflow-routing (SFR1) package to simulate stream-aquifer interaction with MODFLOW-2000 , 2004 .

[29]  B. Babbitt,et al.  METHODS AND GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVE MODEL CALIBRATION , 2001 .

[30]  G. Fogg,et al.  Modeling Spatial Variability with One and Multidimensional Continuous-Lag Markov Chains , 1997 .

[31]  Vitaly A. Zlotnik,et al.  Stream depletion predictions using pumping test data from a heterogeneous stream–aquifer system (a case study from the Great Plains, USA) , 2003 .

[32]  S. Wondzell,et al.  Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams , 2003 .

[33]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  Groundwater Flow in the , 2002 .

[34]  E. Reichard Groundwater–Surface Water Management With Stochastic Surface Water Supplies: A Simulation Optimization Approach , 1995 .

[35]  R. Ritzi,et al.  Hydrofacies distribution and correlation in the Miami Valley Aquifer System , 1995 .

[36]  Michael Bruen,et al.  Sensitivity of stream–aquifer seepage to spatial variability of the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer , 2004 .

[37]  G. Fogg,et al.  Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics , 1996 .

[38]  David E. Prudic,et al.  Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream-aquifer relations using a modular, finite-difference, ground-water flow model , 1989 .

[39]  A. A. Pucci,et al.  Simulated effects of development on regional ground-water/surface-water interactions in the northern Coastal Plain of New Jersey , 1995 .

[40]  Timothy D. Scheibe,et al.  Scaling of flow and transport behavior in heterogeneous groundwater systems , 1998 .

[41]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Comparing transient storage modeling and residence time distribution (RTD) analysis in geomorphically varied reaches in the Lookout Creek basin, Oregon, USA , 2003 .

[42]  T. Harter Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment , 2005 .

[43]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Methods and Guidelines for Effective Model Calibration , 2000 .

[44]  C. Soulsby,et al.  Thermal regime in the hyporheic zone of two contrasting salmonid spawning streams: ecological and hydrological implications , 2002 .

[45]  V. Ponce,et al.  Management of Baseflow Augmentation: a Review , 1990 .

[46]  M. Sophocleous Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science , 2002 .

[47]  Michael E. Campana,et al.  Seasonal variation in surface‐subsurface water exchange and lateral hyporheic area of two stream‐aquifer systems , 1998 .

[48]  S. Dunn,et al.  Groundwater–surface‐water interactions in a braided river: a tracer‐based assessment , 2003 .

[49]  T Michael,et al.  Maloney, and J. , 1992 .