Cancer Patients' Self-Reported Attitudes About the Internet

Background Increasing numbers of cancer patients are using the Internet, but little is known about their attitudes toward online health care. Objective The purpose of this substudy was to analyze cancer patients' attitudes toward online health care. Methods This was a substudy of 41 persons with cancer who used the Internet for health care information and support and who completed the Attitudes Toward Online Health Care (ATOHC) survey. Results The majority of study participants were married, held graduate degrees, and had high incomes. Using a five-point Likert scale, means for the five dimensions of the ATOHC survey were as follows: community and news 3.22 (SD = 1.01), outcomes 3.20 (SD = 1.08), trusted information and advice 2.73 (SD = 0.66), self-efficacy in evaluating information and intention 3.46 (SD = 0.65), and disclosure 3.15 (SD = 1.06). The average response fell between “About half the time” and “Usually.” Favorite websites for content were Medscape and WebMD, while favorite sites for support were WebMD and Mediconsult. Conclusions Respondents were generally eager to obtain and offer cancer information and support online, but they were skeptical of unknown sources. They were comfortable both giving and receiving information and support. Respondents were interested in the experiences of other patients and benefited by their direct and indirect interactions with them. Respondents felt that they coped better with their illness and experienced less uncertainty and anxiety as a result of their online experiences. They reported a certain level of trust, primarily for established reputable sources of information, and they were confident in their ability to evaluate the information, including research reports. In addition, cancer patients displayed a healthy skepticism when presented with the option of divulging their personal health information; however, they were willing to provide personal details if, as a result, a website provided them with individualized information.

[1]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[2]  Robert K. Gable,et al.  Instrument Development in the Affective Domain: Measuring Attitudes and Values in Corporate and School Settings , 1993 .

[3]  M. Knobf,et al.  Use of alternative medicine by women with breast cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  M. Carlsson.  Cancer patients seeking information from sources outside the health care system , 1999 .

[5]  J. Astin.  Use of alternative medicine by women with breast cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  L Hoffman-Goetz,et al.  Quality of Breast Cancer Sites on the World Wide Web , 2000, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[7]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[8]  J Hanson,et al.  Internet usage among women with breast cancer: an exploratory study. , 2000, Clinical breast cancer.

[9]  J. Chin,et al.  Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. , 2001, Urology.

[10]  S P LaCoursiere,et al.  A Theory of Online Social Support , 2001, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[11]  S. Singletary,et al.  Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  M. Knobf,et al.  Carrying On: The Experience of Premature Menopause in Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer , 2002, Nursing research.

[13]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Use of the Internet by Women with Breast Cancer , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  J. Monnier,et al.  Patient and caregiver interest in internet-based cancer services. , 2002, Cancer practice.

[15]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[16]  P. Klemm,et al.  Depression in Internet and face-to-face cancer support groups: a pilot study. , 2002, Oncology nursing forum.

[17]  K. Humphreys,et al.  Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[18]  C. Pinnock,et al.  Meeting the information needs of Australian men with prostate cancer by way of the internet. , 2003, Urology.

[19]  Richard L Street,et al.  Mediated consumer-provider communication in cancer care: the empowering potential of new technologies. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  P. Schultz,et al.  Internet message board use by patients with cancer and their families. , 2003, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[21]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Internet Health Resources , 2003 .

[22]  C. Laiño.  Epoetin Alfa Helps Improve Quality of Life , 2003 .

[23]  C. B. Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer , 2003, Cancer.

[24]  S. Tang,et al.  The Silent Killer: Psychological Issues in Ovarian Cancer , 2003, Holistic nursing practice.

[25]  P. Butow,et al.  Cancer patients' preferences for written prognostic information provided outside the clinical context , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  P. Klemm,et al.  Online Cancer Support Groups: A Review of the Research Literature , 2003, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[27]  H. Lindsey.  First International Conference on Cancer on the Internet: Todayʼs ‘E-Patient’—Online, Proactive, & Independent , 2003 .

[28]  C. Daugherty,et al.  American oncologists' views of internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Gretchen Henkel.  Nomograms: Tailored Prognostic Computer Program Further Validated In International Arena , 2003 .

[30]  K. Mccaul,et al.  Information Gathering Over Time by Breast Cancer Patients , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  G. Eysenbach.  The Impact of the Internet on Cancer Outcomes , 2003, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[32]  Mary Frances Theofanos,et al.  Searching for Cancer Information on the Internet: Analyzing Natural Language Search Queries , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[33]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  L. Degner,et al.  Coping with breast cancer: a cluster analytic approach , 1999, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[35]  Cancer survivorship--United States, 1971-2001. , 2004, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[36]  J. Powell,et al.  Primary care Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups : systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions , 2004 .

[37]  V. Pitts,et al.  Illness and Internet Empowerment: Writing and Reading Breast Cancer in Cyberspace , 2004, Health.

[38]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2005 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.