To blend or not to blend? Consumer attitudes towards mandatory use of ethanol-blended fuel in Zimbabwe

Worldwide, the use of bioethanol is proliferating as an alternative to fossil fuels. Consistent with this trend, the Zimbabwean government mandated the blending of unleaded petrol with 10% ethanol. As the use of ethanol-blended fuel is still at the infancy stage in Zimbabwe, the objective of this study was to explore consumer attitudes towards mandatory use of ethanolblended petrol. The study employed a qualitative research design, and data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interviews from motorists who regularly use blended fuel. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse interview transcripts. The study showed that the market acceptance of blended fuel remains low in Zimbabwe. The main themes that characterised consumer attitudes towards blended fuel were cynicism, misinformation, unavailability and risk perception. Overall, the study found that the use of ethanol-blended fuel remains a contested terrain in Zimbabwe and there is a need for consumer education to correct misconceptions prevailing in the marketplace.

[1]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[2]  Jikun Huang,et al.  Global biofuel production and poverty in China , 2012 .

[3]  Stepan Wood,et al.  Second generation biofuels and bioinvasions: An evaluation of invasive risks and policy responses in the United States and Canada , 2013 .

[4]  Wallace E. Tyner,et al.  Market-mediated environmental impacts of biofuels. , 2013 .

[5]  C. S. Shonhiwa,et al.  The Techno-Economic impact of Petrol- Ethanol Fuel blends on light duty vehicles: Case study- Zimbabwean Petrol Vehicle Fleet. , 2013 .

[6]  Patrick Hartmann,et al.  Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern , 2012 .

[7]  Michael P. Popp,et al.  Perceived importance of fuel characteristics and its match with consumer beliefs about biofuels in Belgium , 2009 .

[8]  Michael Peters,et al.  Mobilising community action towards a low-carbon future: Opportunities and challenges for local government in the UK , 2010 .

[9]  Richard Goe,et al.  Biofuels Bonanza?: Exploring community perceptions of the promises and perils of biofuels production , 2011 .

[10]  Jean-Michel Lavoie,et al.  From first- to third-generation biofuels: Challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity , 2013 .

[11]  M. Harvey,et al.  Battles over Biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the Politics of Markets , 2010 .

[12]  Paul Andre Henri Francois Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Driving on liquid sunshine – the Brazilian biofuel experience: a policy driven analysis , 2009 .

[13]  Phanankosi Moyo,et al.  Biofuel Policy as a Key Driver for Sustainable Development in the Biofuel Sector: The Missing Ingredient in Zimbabwe's Biofuel Pursuit , 2013 .

[14]  S. Raman,et al.  Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels , 2013, Energy policy.

[15]  Johan F.M. Swinnen,et al.  Biofuels and Food Security: Micro-Evidence from Ethiopia , 2012 .

[16]  G. Beyene,et al.  Food production needs fuel too: perspectives on the impact of biofuels in southern Africa , 2010 .

[17]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Labeling renewable energies: how the language surrounding biofuels can influence its public acceptance. , 2012 .

[18]  Bernardina Algieri.  The Influence of Biofuels, Economic and Financial Factors on Daily Returns of Commodity Futures Prices , 2014 .

[19]  Miriam. Ricci,et al.  Engaging the public on paths to sustainable energy: Who has to trust whom? , 2010 .

[20]  Stef Proost,et al.  Energy and environment challenges in the transport sector , 2012 .

[21]  P. Bloom,et al.  Choosing the Right Green Marketing Strategy , 2004 .

[22]  D. Petrolia,et al.  Do Americans Want Ethanol? A Comparative Contingent-Valuation Study of Willingness to Pay for E-10 and E-85 , 2008 .

[23]  Henrique Pacini,et al.  The price for biofuels sustainability. , 2013 .

[24]  Phillip M. Mohebalian,et al.  Exploring the drivers' side of the “blend wall”: U.S. consumer preferences for ethanol blend fuels , 2015 .

[25]  Japhet Eke Lawrence,et al.  The Use of Grounded Theory Technique as a Practical Tool for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis , 2013 .

[26]  W. Tyner,et al.  Policy Update: Implications of blending limits on the US ethanol and biofuels markets , 2010 .

[27]  William K. Jaeger,et al.  Biofuel Economics in a Setting of Multiple Objectives & Unintended Consequences , 2011 .

[28]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[29]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[30]  G. V. D. Ven,et al.  What drives sustainable biofuels? A review of indicator assessments of biofuel production systems involving smallholder farmers , 2014 .

[31]  Richard J. Murphy,et al.  Global developments in the competition for land from biofuels , 2011 .

[32]  Ian Convery,et al.  Social impacts of community renewable energy projects: findings from a woodfuel case study , 2012 .

[33]  Michael Taylor,et al.  An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[34]  Jeff Joireman,et al.  Relating values and consideration of future and immediate consequences to consumer preference for biofuels: A three-dimensional social dilemma analysis , 2013 .