Effect of geogrid on railroad ballast particle movement

Abstract Individual ballast particle movement significantly affects ballast performance. In order to improve ballast performance, geogrids are widely used to create interlocking of ballast particles to reduce particle movement. To better quantify the effect of geogrid on particle movement, two types of ballast box tests were conducted in this study: one without geogrid as a control and the other one with a layer of multiaxial geogrid placed at 25 cm below the top of the ballast. The ballast box represents a half section of a railroad track structure consisting of a ballast layer, two crossties, and a rail (I-beam). A wireless device – “SmartRock” was embedded underneath the rail seat and the edge of a tie in the ballast layer to monitor particle translation and rotation under cyclic loading. The results indicate that (1) horizontal translation and rotation are important modes of movement for ballast particles under cyclic loading; (2) particle translational movement and rotation were higher beneath the edge of the tie than those beneath the rail seat; (3) the particle movement, such as translation and rotation, were significantly reduced with an inclusion of the geogrid under 500 load cycles. This investigation also demonstrates that the SmartRock is capable of recording and visualizing real-time particle movement including translation and rotation and, hence, can be used as a fundamental research and monitoring tool in railroad.

[1]  Tore Dahlberg,et al.  Some railroad settlement models—A critical review , 2001 .

[2]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Geogrid-Aggregate Interlock Mechanism Investigated through Aggregate Imaging-Based Discrete Element Modeling Approach , 2012 .

[3]  Gerald P Raymond,et al.  DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF OPEN-GRADED HIGHWAY AGGREGATES , 1990 .

[4]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT OF BALLASTED TRACK , 1987 .

[5]  Clarence W. de Silva,et al.  Vibration: Fundamentals and Practice , 1999 .

[6]  Hai Huang,et al.  Discrete element modeling of railroad ballast using imaging based aggregate morphology characterization , 2010 .

[7]  Gerald P Raymond,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF LARGE-SCALE MODEL SINGLE TIE-BALLAST SYSTEMS , 1987 .

[8]  Sebastian Madgwick,et al.  Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[9]  S. F. Brown,et al.  Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced aggregates , 2006 .

[10]  G. Raymond Reinforced ballast behaviour subjected to repeated load , 2002 .

[11]  Braja M. Das,et al.  Geogrid-reinforced railroad bed settlement due to cyclic load , 2002 .

[12]  Gerald P Raymond,et al.  Repeated-load response of aggregates in relation to track quality index , 1994 .

[13]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Discrete Element Modeling of Railroad Ballast Settlement , 2007 .

[14]  M S Matharu,et al.  GEOGRIDS CUT BALLAST SETTLEMENT RATE ON SOFT SUBSTRUCTURES , 1994 .

[15]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling , 2011 .

[16]  Yu Qian,et al.  Stress Analysis on Triangular-Aperture Geogrid-Reinforced Bases over Weak Subgrade under Cyclic Loading , 2011 .

[17]  Robert M. Koerner,et al.  Designing with Geosynthetics , 1986 .

[18]  S Marich,et al.  Ballast Characteristics in the Laboratory , 1987 .

[19]  David M. Coleman USE OF GEOGRIDS IN RAILROAD TRACK: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND SYNOPSIS , 1990 .

[20]  Y. Hashash,et al.  Aggregate Shape Effects on Ballast Tamping and Railroad Track Lateral Stability , 2006 .

[21]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Evaluation of image analysis techniques for quantifying aggregate shape characteristics , 2007 .

[22]  Hai Huang,et al.  Laboratory Development and Testing of “SmartRock” for Railroad Ballast Using Discrete Element Modeling , 2015 .

[23]  Liang Gao,et al.  Comparison of Laboratory Testing Using SmartRock and Discrete Element Modeling of Ballast Particle Movement , 2017 .

[24]  Pierre-Etienne Gautier,et al.  Modelling ballast behaviour under dynamic loading. Part 1: A 2D polygonal discrete element method approach , 2006 .

[25]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  DEM simulation of the behaviour of geogrid stabilised ballast fouled with coal , 2014 .