Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention compared with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI) and thrombolytic therapy (TT) are alternative means of achieving reperfusion in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes between both reperfusion strategies. The authors sought to compare in-hospital outcomes after PCI or TT for patients with acute STEMI. MATERIAL AND METHOD From August 2002 through June 2004, data from all patients who received reperfusion therapy for acute STEMI were collected prospectively. The decision regarding type of reperfusion strategy was at the attending cardiologist's discretion. The patient's data on demographics, procedures, medications, and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS From August 2002 through June 2004, 234 patients were admitted to the authors' institute with the diagnosis of acute STEMI. Of the 146 patients who received reperfusion therapy, 91 were treated with primary PCI and 55 received intravenous TT as the reperfusion modality. In the TT group, 51 (93%) patients received streptokinase and 11 (21.6%) underwent rescue angioplasty. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. Both patient groups had frequent presence of diabetes (PCI 44.2% vs. TT 39.6%, p = 0. 6). Cardiogenic shock on admission was present in 11% of the PCI patients and 7.3% of the TT patients (p = ns). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different in the two groups (PCI 14.3% vs. TT 10. 9%, p = 0.56). In the TT group, there was a trend toward a higher rate of major bleeding (PCI 6.6% vs. TT 16.4%, p = 0.06) and stroke (PCI 2.2% vs. TT 7.3%, p = 0.13) complications without statistical significance. CONCLUSION The present findings suggest that both PCI and TT are comparable alternative methods of reperfusion among STEMI patients in terms of in-hospital mortality. In certain subgroups that are at increased risk of bleeding or stroke, primary PCI may be the preferred treatment strategy.

[1]  L. Rydén,et al.  Mortality and morbidity during a five-year follow-up of diabetics with myocardial infarction. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[2]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  R. Califf,et al.  Outcome of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in diabetics treated with fibrinolytic or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: lessons from the GUSTO V trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Boura,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2022 .

[5]  R. Schiele,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty? Results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and the Myocardial Infarction Regis , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  G. Bernardi,et al.  [Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction]. , 2000, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[7]  J. W. Schaeffer,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the american college of cardiology/ american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina) , 2000 .

[8]  R. Califf,et al.  Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. , 1999, Circulation.

[9]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by primary coronary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis in the "real world": one-year results from a nationwide French survey. , 1999, Circulation.

[10]  J. Gore,et al.  Clinical experience with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2). , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  S. Egaas A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction , 1997 .

[12]  J S Martin,et al.  A Comparison of Thrombolytic Therapy with Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1996 .

[13]  H. White,et al.  Significance of diabetes mellitus in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytic therapy. Investigators of the International Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Streptokinase Mortality Trial. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  H. White,et al.  Significance of diabetes mellitus in patients with acute myocardial infraction receiving thrombolytic theraphy , 1993 .

[15]  R. Califf,et al.  Outcome of patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents. The Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J O'Keefe,et al.  A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1993 .

[17]  J. Reiber,et al.  A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  S. Srimahachota,et al.  Comparison of official hours versus non-official hours: percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[19]  S. Effert,et al.  Successful treatment of acute myocardial infarction shock by combined percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization (PTCR) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). , 1982, American heart journal.