Development of a simulation model to assess the impact of contamination in casework using STRs.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Sparkes,et al. Validation of the AMPFlSTR SGM plus system for use in forensic casework. , 2000, Forensic science international.
[2] Jonathan Whitaker,et al. Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.
[3] I. Evett,et al. A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework , 1998 .
[4] J Buckleton,et al. Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. , 1998, Forensic science international.
[5] J Buckleton,et al. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.
[6] S. Hummel,et al. Evidence of contamination in PCR laboratory disposables , 1995, Naturwissenschaften.
[7] I. Evett,et al. More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[8] Franco Taroni,et al. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.
[9] Peter Gill,et al. Role of short tandem repeat DNA in forensic casework in the UK--past, present, and future perspectives. , 2002, BioTechniques.
[10] Ian W. Evett,et al. Case pre-assessment and review in a two-way transfer case , 1999 .
[11] P Gill,et al. Application of low copy number DNA profiling. , 2001, Croatian medical journal.
[12] Gillian Tully,et al. The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. , 2002, Forensic science international.