Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks.

Google Flu Trends can detect regional outbreaks of influenza 7-10 days before conventional Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance systems. We describe the Google Trends tool, explain how the data are processed, present examples, and discuss its strengths and limitations. Google Trends shows great promise as a timely, robust, and sensitive surveillance system. It is best used for surveillance of epidemics and diseases with high prevalences and is currently better suited to track disease activity in developed countries, because to be most effective, it requires large populations of Web search users. Spikes in search volume are currently hard to interpret but have the benefit of increasing vigilance. Google should work with public health care practitioners to develop specialized tools, using Google Flu Trends as a blueprint, to track infectious diseases. Suitable Web search query proxies for diseases need to be established for specialized tools or syndromic surveillance. This unique and innovative technology takes us one step closer to true real-time outbreak surveillance.

[1]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[2]  Hua Liu,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of the relationship between WNV dissemination and environmental variables in Indianapolis, USA , 2008, International journal of health geographics.

[3]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Using internet searches for influenza surveillance. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  Jennifer Thomas,et al.  Avian influenza: a review. , 2007, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[5]  D. Cummings,et al.  Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia , 2005, Nature.

[6]  L. Goss,et al.  Syndromic Surveillance: Hospital Emergency Department Participation During the Kentucky Derby Festival , 2005, Disaster Management & Response.

[7]  William B. Lober,et al.  Review Paper: Implementing Syndromic Surveillance: A Practical Guide Informed by the Early Experience , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  J. Bresee,et al.  Substantial variability in community respiratory syncytial virus season timing , 2003, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[9]  C. Irvin,et al.  Syndromic analysis of computerized emergency department patients' chief complaints: an opportunity for bioterrorism and influenza surveillance. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  Julio Frenk,et al.  Globalization and the challenges to health systems. , 2002, Health affairs.

[11]  R. Platt,et al.  Using automated medical records for rapid identification of illness syndromes (syndromic surveillance): the example of lower respiratory infection , 2001, BMC public health.

[12]  Farzad Mostashari,et al.  Epidemic West Nile encephalitis, New York, 1999: results of a household-based seroepidemiological survey , 2001, The Lancet.

[13]  Z. Hubálek,et al.  West Nile fever in Czechland. , 1999, Emerging infectious diseases.

[14]  J. Wagner,et al.  WEST NILE VIRUS : Epidemiology and Clinical Features of an Emerging Epidemic in the United States ∗ , 2010 .

[15]  R. Karron,et al.  Respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumovirus , 2007 .

[16]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Infodemiology: Tracking Flu-Related Searches on the Web for Syndromic Surveillance , 2006, AMIA.

[17]  Wendy W. Chapman,et al.  Analysis of Web Access Logs for Surveillance of Influenza , 2004, MedInfo.