A virtual geometric morphometric approach to the quantification of long bone bilateral asymmetry and cross-sectional shape.

OBJECTIVE The widespread use of three-dimensional digitization means that models of whole bone geometry are routinely captured for many applications in virtual anthropology. In this article, we test whether a geometric morphometric (GMM) approach can be used to accurately quantify directional bilateral asymmetry in cross-sectional shape using virtual bone models. METHODS We introduce a method to (1) orient virtual long bone models and extract cross sections and (2) collect GMM landmarks to analyze cross-sectional shape. Landmark data, captured using polar radii, were analyzed for an example study set of paired humeri from Andaman Islanders sampled at 35%, 50%, and 65% locations. RESULTS The GMM method can (1) detect significant differences in left and right cross-sectional shape and (2) allow the directionality of shape change (distribution of bone from centroid) to be evaluated in the context of whole outline shape and in relation to the axis of maximum bending rigidity. The protocol may be used with models created from laser (surface) scan or computed tomography (CT) scan data, and applied to cross-sectional images that were collected using periosteal molding techniques. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate directional bilateral asymmetry in shape, but do not recover the same signal for size measurements. Our method offers a pathway to quantify both the pattern of variation in shape and the relationship between size and shape variation, opening new questions about how those patterns manifest over ontogeny, change temporally or differ in relation to the nature and intensity of the activity, and bone loading conditions.

[1]  C. Ruff,et al.  Long bone articular and diaphyseal structure in old world monkeys and apes. I: locomotor effects. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  W. Parr,et al.  Three‐dimensional shape variation of talar surface morphology in hominoid primates , 2014, Journal of anatomy.

[3]  Cara Ocobock,et al.  Waddling and toddling: the biomechanical effects of an immature gait. , 2010, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  Roger Phillips,et al.  Virtual Functional Morphology: Novel Approaches to the Study of Craniofacial Form and Function , 2012, Evolutionary Biology.

[5]  S. R. Schofield,et al.  Charge density waves in the graphene sheets of the superconductor CaC(6). , 2011, Nature communications.

[6]  B. Richmond,et al.  Biomechanical Implications of Intraspecific Shape Variation in Chimpanzee Crania: Moving Toward an Integration of Geometric Morphometrics and Finite Element Analysis , 2015, Anatomical record.

[7]  I. Werneburg,et al.  Quantifying evolutionary development using non-model organisms: integrating morphology, metrical frameworks, and gene expression. , 2014, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[8]  P. Gunz,et al.  Advances in Geometric Morphometrics , 2009, Evolutionary Biology.

[9]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. , 2004, Journal of human evolution.

[10]  C. Ruff,et al.  Diaphyseal cross-sectional morphology and biomechanics of the Fond-de-Foret 1 femur and the Spy 2 femur and tibia , 1989 .

[11]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Comparison of dental measurement systems for taxonomic assignment of first molars. , 2011, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  A. Stirland.  Asymmetry and activity-related change in the male humerus , 1993 .

[13]  Laura A B Wilson,et al.  Shape, size, and maturity trajectories of the human ilium. , 2015, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  Donald A. Jackson.  STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES' , 1993 .

[15]  C. Rubin,et al.  Patterns of strain in the macaque ulna during functional activity. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[16]  Giorgio Manzi,et al.  Evolution of the base of the brain in highly encephalized human species. , 2011, Nature communications.

[17]  A. Robling,et al.  The Effect of Mechanical Loading on the Size and Shape of Bone in Pre‐, Peri‐, and Postpubertal Girls: A Study in Tennis Players , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  Christopher Ruff,et al.  Ontogenetic adaptation to bipedalism: age changes in femoral to humeral length and strength proportions in humans, with a comparison to baboons. , 2003, Journal of human evolution.

[19]  L. Cabo,et al.  Quantifying asymmetry: ratios and alternatives. , 2014, American journal of physical anthropology.

[20]  Benjamin M. Auerbach,et al.  Limb bone bilateral asymmetry: variability and commonality among modern humans. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[21]  C. Ruff.  Sexual dimorphism in human lower limb bone structure: relationship to subsistence strategy and sexual division of labor , 1987 .

[22]  H Sievänen,et al.  Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. , 2000, Bone.

[23]  Marco Orlandi,et al.  Technical note: virtual reconstruction of a fragmentary clavicle. , 2009, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  G. Weber,et al.  Virtual anthropology. , 2015, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  Andrea Cardini,et al.  On growth and form in the "computer era": from geometric to biological morphometrics , 2013 .

[26]  H Krahl,et al.  Stimulation of Bone Growth Through Sports A Radiologic Investigation of the Upper Extremities in Professional Tennis Players , 2006 .

[27]  J. Stock,et al.  Intensity, repetitiveness, and directionality of habitual adolescent mobility patterns influence the tibial diaphysis morphology of athletes. , 2009, American journal of physical anthropology.

[28]  Paul O'Higgins,et al.  Applying geometric morphometrics to compare changes in size and shape arising from finite elements analyses , 2013 .

[29]  J. Stock,et al.  The Bioarchaeology of Habitual Activity and Dietary Change in the Siberian Middle Holocene , 2011 .

[30]  C. Ruff,et al.  Postcranial robusticity in Homo. II: Humeral bilateral asymmetry and bone plasticity. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[31]  B. R. Moore,et al.  A modification of the Rayleigh test for vector data , 1980 .

[32]  E. Weiss.  Effects of rowing on humeral strength. , 2003, American journal of physical anthropology.

[33]  V. Bernal,et al.  Differences between sliding semi‐landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[34]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Analyzing Fluctuating Asymmetry with Geometric Morphometrics: Concepts, Methods, and Applications , 2015, Symmetry.

[35]  Natalie R. Shirley,et al.  A three-dimensional analysis of bilateral directional asymmetry in the human clavicle. , 2012, American journal of physical anthropology.

[36]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. , 1998, Bone.

[37]  W C H Parr,et al.  Toward integration of geometric morphometrics and computational biomechanics: new methods for 3D virtual reconstruction and quantitative analysis of Finite Element Models. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  C. Ruff,et al.  Robusticity versus Shape: The Functional Interpretation of Neandertal Appendicular Morphology , 1991 .

[39]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  A New Fully Automated Approach for Aligning and Comparing Shapes , 2015, Anatomical record.

[40]  O. Pearson,et al.  The importance of accounting for the area of the medullary cavity in cross-sectional geometry: A test based on the femoral midshaft. , 2010, American journal of physical anthropology.

[41]  Ron Pinhasi,et al.  Declining tibial curvature parallels ∼6150 years of decreasing mobility in Central European agriculturalists. , 2015, American journal of physical anthropology.

[42]  C. Ruff,et al.  Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff?: "Wolff's law" and bone functional adaptation. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[43]  Dean C. Adams,et al.  A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21 st century , 2013 .

[44]  J. Stock.  Hunter-gatherer postcranial robusticity relative to patterns of mobility, climatic adaptation, and selection for tissue economy. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[45]  Jay T. Stock,et al.  A test of a new method and software for the rapid estimation of cross-sectional geometric properties of long bone diaphyses from 3D laser surface scans , 2012, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[46]  S. Mays,et al.  Handedness and directional asymmetry in the long bones of the human upper limb , 1995 .

[47]  M. Bastir,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of sexual dimorphism in human thoracic vertebrae: implications for the respiratory system and spine morphology. , 2014, American journal of physical anthropology.

[48]  A. Meyer,et al.  SHAPE ANALYSIS OF SYMMETRIC STRUCTURES: QUANTIFYING VARIATION AMONG INDIVIDUALS AND ASYMMETRY , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  W. Hayes,et al.  Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae--a biomechanical investigation: I. Method and general patterns of variation. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[50]  J. Stock,et al.  Long bone robusticity and subsistence behaviour among Later Stone Age foragers of the forest and fynbos biomes of South Africa , 2004 .

[51]  Pekka Kannus,et al.  Effect of Long‐Term Impact‐Loading on Mass, Size, and Estimated Strength of Humerus and Radius of Female Racquet‐Sports Players: A Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Study Between Young and Old Starters and Controls , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[52]  Marta Mirazón Lahr,et al.  The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[53]  J. Stock,et al.  Which measures of diaphyseal robusticity are robust? A comparison of external methods of quantifying the strength of long bone diaphyses to cross-sectional geometric properties. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[54]  F. P. Magee,et al.  In vivo strain analysis of the greyhound femoral diaphysis. , 1992, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[55]  Daniel E Lieberman,et al.  Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry. , 2004, American journal of physical anthropology.

[56]  K. Carlson,et al.  Increased non-linear locomotion alters diaphyseal bone shape , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[57]  J. Stock,et al.  Linking structural variability in long bone diaphyses to habitual behaviors: foragers from the southern African Later Stone Age and the Andaman Islands. , 2001, American journal of physical anthropology.

[58]  W. Parr,et al.  Evolution of neck vertebral shape and neck retraction at the transition to modern turtles: an integrated geometric morphometric approach. , 2015, Systematic biology.

[59]  J. Stock,et al.  Habitual throwing and swimming correspond with upper limb diaphyseal strength and shape in modern human athletes. , 2009, American journal of physical anthropology.

[60]  Gianpaolo Savio,et al.  Optical Properties of Spectacle Lenses Computed by Surfaces Differential Quantities , 2013 .

[61]  A. Blackburn.  Bilateral asymmetry of the humerus during growth and development. , 2011, American journal of physical anthropology.