Improved inter-modality image registration using normalized mutual information with coarse-binned histograms

SUMMARY In this paper we extend the method of inter-modality image registration using the maximization of normalized mutual information (NMI) for the registration of [ 18 F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)positron emission tomography (PET) with T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) volumes. We investigate the impact on the NMI maximization with respect to using coarse-to-fine grained B-spline bases and to the number of bins required for the voxel intensity histograms of each volume. Our results demonstrate that the efficiency and accuracy of elastic, as well as rigid body, registration is improved both through the use of a reduced number of bins in the PET and MR histograms, and of a limited coarse-to-fine grain interpolation of the volume data. To determine the appropriate number of bins prior to registration, we consider the NMI between the two volumes, the mutual information content of the two volumes, as a function of the binning of each volume. Simulated data sets are used for validation and the registration improves that obtained with a standard approach based on the Statistical Parametric Mapping software. Copyright q 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[2]  A Collignon,et al.  Automated multimodality image registration using information theory , 1995 .

[3]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A hierarchical approach to elastic registration based on mutual information , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[4]  Jan Flusser,et al.  Image registration methods: a survey , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[5]  Sung Yong Shin,et al.  Scattered Data Interpolation with Multilevel B-Splines , 1997, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[6]  R. Dony,et al.  Evaluation of hierarchical elastic medical image registration method , 2004, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2004 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37513).

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  MRI and PET Coregistration—A Cross Validation of Statistical Parametric Mapping and Automated Image Registration , 1997, NeuroImage.

[8]  D L Hill,et al.  Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. , 1997, Medical physics.

[9]  David R. Forsey,et al.  Hierarchical B-spline refinement , 1988, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  M. Zibaeifard,et al.  An adaptive simulated annealing scheme for multi-modality medical image registration by maximization of mutual information , 2006, 2006 8th international Conference on Signal Processing.

[11]  Gerald E. Farin,et al.  Image registration using hierarchical B-splines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  E. Reiman,et al.  Clustering huge data sets for parametric PET imaging. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[13]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Yang-Ming Zhu,et al.  Influence of implementation parameters on registration of MR and SPECT brain images by maximization of mutual information. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.