Regulatory behaviour, exploration and locomotion following NMDA or 6-OHDA lesions in the rat nucleus accumbens

The effects of bilateral, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens (N.Acc.) on regulatory and behavioural responding were studied in rats and compared with the effects of bilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions. After postoperative body weight, food and water intake had been monitored for a period of 4 weeks, rats were tested in an exploration-choice box. Spontaneous locomotion and the locomotor and stereotypy responses to different doses of dopaminergic agonists were measured subsequently. Detailed assessment of NMDA-induced lesion volumes showed that on average 81.53% of total N.Acc. area was damaged, depending on excitotoxin dose. Tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemistry was used to confirm loss of mesolimbic dopamine neurones following 6-OHDA. Analysis of the behavioural data showed that NMDA N.Acc. lesions significantly enhanced exploratory behaviour, spontaneous locomotor activity and the locomotor response to a low dose of D-amphetamine. By comparison, 6-OHDA lesions did not affect exploration and spontaneous locomotion but significantly attenuated the locomotor response to a low dose of D-amphetamine. Regulatory responses were unaffected 28 days after surgery, although NMDA-lesioned rats took longer to recover from postoperative hypodipsia. The results suggest that NMDA N.Acc. lesions induce a deficit in the control of general locomotor output and are consistent with the hypothesis that the N.Acc. functions as an interface between sensory input and locomotor output and that it is needed to channel activity levels appropriately.

[1]  G. Mogenson,et al.  Hippocampal signal transmission to the pedunculopontine nucleus and its regulation by dopamine D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens: An electrophysiological and behavioural study , 1987, Neuroscience.

[2]  Gerard P. Smith,et al.  Mesolimbicocortical dopamine terminal fields are necessary for normal locomotor and investigatory exploration in rats , 1980, Brain Research.

[3]  L. Pellegrino,et al.  stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain , 1967 .

[4]  L. Heimer,et al.  New perspectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: The striatopallidal, amygdaloid, and corticopetal components of substantia innominata , 1988, Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Mogenson,et al.  Electrophysiological responses of neurones in the nucleus accumbens to hippocampal stimulation and the attenuation of the excitatory responses by the mesolimbic dopaminergic system , 1984, Brain Research.

[6]  A. Kelley,et al.  The distribution of the projection from the hippocampal formation to the nucleus accumbens in the rat: An anterograde and retrograde-horseradish peroxidase study , 1982, Neuroscience.

[7]  J. V. van Rossum,et al.  Effects of chemical stimulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system upon locomotor activity. , 1976, European journal of pharmacology.

[8]  G. Koob,et al.  Hyperactivity and hypoactivity produced by lesions to the mesolimbic dopamine system , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  J. V. van Rossum,et al.  Ergometrine induced locomotor activity following intracerebral injection into the nucleus accumbens. , 1973, Brain research.

[10]  T. Robbins,et al.  Selective disruption of displacement behaviour by lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine system , 1980, Nature.

[11]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[12]  J. Evenden,et al.  The effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens and caudate nucleus of rats on feeding in a novel environment , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  From motivation to action: Functional interface between the limbic system and the motor system , 1980, Progress in Neurobiology.

[14]  T. Robbins,et al.  Functional studies of the central catecholamines. , 1982, International review of neurobiology.

[15]  A. Phillips,et al.  Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning , 1982, Brain Research.

[16]  C. Y. Yim,et al.  Low doses of accumbens dopamine modulate amygdala suppression of spontaneous exploratory activity in rats , 1989, Brain Research.

[17]  C. Y. Yim,et al.  Response of nucleus accumbens neurons to amygdala stimulation and its modification by dopamine , 1982, Brain Research.

[18]  T. Robbins,et al.  The effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the nucleus accumbens on spatial learning and extinction in the rat , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  H. Fibiger,et al.  On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous self-administration of cocaine , 1977, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[20]  P. Winn.  Excitotoxins as Tools for Producing Brain Lesions , 1991 .

[21]  Gerard P. Smith,et al.  Relationships between selective denervation of dopamine terminal fields in the anterior forebrain and behavioral responses to amphetamine and apomorphine , 1980, Brain Research.

[22]  J. Garthwaite,et al.  Amino acid neurotoxicity: Intracellular sites of calcium accumulation associated with the onset of irreversible damage to rat cerebellar neurones in vitro , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  T. Robbins,et al.  Effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and olfactory tubercle on feeding, locomotor activity, and amphetamine anorexia in the rat. , 1978, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  S. Iversen,et al.  Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and corpus striatum , 1975, Brain Research.

[25]  J. Garthwaite,et al.  Mechanisms of AMPA Neurotoxicity in Rat Brain Slices , 1991, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  T. Robbins,et al.  The basolateral amygdala-ventral striatal system and conditioned place preference: Further evidence of limbic-striatal interactions underlying reward-related processes , 1991, Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Winn,et al.  Excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus of the rat. I. Comparison of the effects of various excitotoxins, with particular reference to the loss of immunohistochemically identified cholinergic neurons , 1992, Brain Research.

[28]  G. Mogenson,et al.  Response of ventral pallidal neurons to amygdala stimulation and its modulation by dopamine projections to nucleus accumbens. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  P. Kelly,et al.  Effects of amphetamine and apomorphine on locomotor activity after 6-OHDA and electrolytic lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi , 1983, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[30]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[31]  T. Robbins,et al.  Comparative effects of infusions of 6-hydroxydopamine into nucleus accumbens and anterolateral hypothalamus induced by 6-hydroxydopamine on the response to dopamine agonists, body weight, locomotor activity and measures of exploration in the rat , 1985, Neuropharmacology.

[32]  T. Robbins,et al.  Attenuation of amphetamine-stereotypy by mesostriatal dopamine depletion enhances plasma corticosterone: implications for stereotypy as a coping response. , 1989, Behavioral and neural biology.

[33]  T. Robbins,et al.  Interactions between the amygdala and ventral striatum in stimulus-reward associations: Studies using a second-order schedule of sexual reinforcement , 1989, Neuroscience.