Estimation of functional brain connectivity from electrocorticograms using an artificial network model

This paper proposes a novel network model for estimation of interaction intensity among partially observed signals. The network model can acquire connectivity weights among the signals as a forward model through iterative learning using past and future signals. To evaluate accuracy of the estimation, the model was applied on artificial and physiological data. In case of artificial signals, when all signals were used, the network was able to estimate directional interactions. On the other hand, the network failed to estimate directional interactions when only parts of the signals were used. However, the network was able to estimate whether interactions exist, and signals were successfully grouped into each of its sources using the obtained connectivity. Furthermore, for physiological signals, we obtained connectivity weights that cluster the recording electrode sites into physiologically plausible brain areas. These results suggest that the proposed network model can be used to estimate the clustered interactions from the partially observed signals.

[1]  Takashi Hanakawa,et al.  Functional coupling underlying motor and cognitive functions of the dorsal premotor cortex , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts , 1991, Neural Computation.

[3]  E. Hoshi Functional specialization within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A review of anatomical and physiological studies of non-human primates , 2006, Neuroscience Research.

[4]  Naotaka Fujii,et al.  Long-Term Asynchronous Decoding of Arm Motion Using Electrocorticographic Signals in Monkeys , 2009, Front. Neuroeng..

[5]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  Karl J. Friston Causal Modelling and Brain Connectivity in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009, PLoS biology.

[7]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[8]  Jing Yu,et al.  Computational Inference of Neural Information Flow Networks , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Iwona Stepniewska,et al.  Ipsilateral cortical connections of dorsal and ventral premotor areas in New World owl monkeys , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Todd P. Coleman,et al.  Estimating the directed information to infer causal relationships in ensemble neural spike train recordings , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[12]  J Tanji,et al.  Input organization of distal and proximal forelimb areas in the monkey primary motor cortex: A retrograde double labeling study , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  W. Hesse,et al.  The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Jun Tani,et al.  A model for learning to segment temporal sequences, utilizing a mixture of RNN experts together with adaptive variance , 2007, Neural Networks.

[15]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[16]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[18]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.