The openness of smartphone software platforms - A framework and preliminary empirical findings from the developers' perspective

Application developers are of growing importance to ensure that smartphone software platforms gain or maintain a competitive edge. However, despite the increasing research interest in platform openness, previous research attempts have neglected to investigate the perspective of third-party developers. This paper contributes to a more sophisticated understanding of the third-party developers" individual perception of platform openness by identifying concrete facets of openness and evaluating their impact on the developers" work. For this purpose, a comprehensive qualitative investigation and a quantitative survey were undertaken. Based on our findings, we discuss practical implications regarding the management of third-party developers in smartphone platform ecosystems.

[1]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[2]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[4]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[5]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[6]  A. Gawer.  Platform Dynamics and Strategies: From Products to Services , 2009 .

[7]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[8]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[9]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[10]  Shane M. Greenstein,et al.  Invisible hands versus invisible advisors : coordination mechanisms in economic networks / 1993:111 , 1993 .

[11]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta , 1992, Business History Review.

[12]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[13]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Complementary network externalities and technological adoption , 1993 .

[14]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[15]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[16]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[17]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Six Challenges in Platform Licensing and Open Innovation , 2009 .

[18]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  Evaluating architectural openness in mobile software platforms , 2010, ECSA '10.

[19]  Detlef Schoder,et al.  Openness of Information Resources - A Framework-based Comparison of Mobile Platforms , 2010, ECIS.

[20]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. , 1991 .

[21]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse , 2010 .

[22]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Joseph Farrell.  Standards and Public Policy: Should competition policy favor compatibility? , 2006 .