Cervical tooth wear and sensitivity: erosion, softening and rehardening of dentine; effects of pH, time and ultrasonication.

BACKGROUND Cervical dentine wear is commonly observed and may be associated with dentine hypersensitivity. Erosion is thought to play a part in both conditions but compared to enamel has been little studied in dentine. AIM The aims of these studies in vitro were to: (i) determine the effects of citric acid on dentine at different pH values and over time; (ii) measure the depth of dentine demineralisation or softening using ultrasonication; (iii) determine whether softened dentine can be remineralised or rehardened using artificial saliva. METHODS Groups of flat dentine specimens prepared from unerupted human third molar teeth were: (a) exposed to citric acid at pH 3.2 for periods up to 4 h with mineral water as control; (b) exposed to citric acid at pH 2.54, 3.2, 4.5, 5.5 and 6.0 for 2 h and then subjected to ultrasonication stepwise up to 480 s; (c) exposed to citric acid at pH 2.54, 3.2, and 4.5, placed into artificial saliva for 24 h and then subjected to ultrasonication as in (b). Loss of dentine was measured by profilometry, after, each phase of erosion, ultrasonication and immersion in artificial saliva. RESULTS Depth of erosion significantly increased non-linearly with time and significantly decreased with increasing pH. Ultrasonication had minimal albeit significant effects on control specimens. Removal of softened dentine increased with ultrasonication time. Depth of softening significantly increased with increasing erosion time to 2 h, plateauing at 2 microm. Depth of softening increased to 2 microm from pH 2.54 to pH 3.2 and decreased at higher pH values thereafter. 24 h in artificial saliva provided no protection to the soften zone against ultrasonicaion. Citric acid at all pH values and exposure times removed the dentine smear layer to expose tubules. Ultrasonication did not remove the smear layer on control specimens but removed all deposits formed after exposure to artificial saliva. CONCLUSION It is concluded that dentine is susceptible to erosion even at relatively high pH, the tubule system is readily exposed and dentine, unlike enamel, shows little propensity to remineralise.

[1]  M. Eisenburger,et al.  Effect of Time on the Remineralisation of Enamel by Synthetic Saliva after Citric Acid Erosion , 2001, Caries Research.

[2]  M. Eisenburger,et al.  The Use of Ultrasonication to Study Remineralisation of Eroded Enamel , 2000, Caries Research.

[3]  K. Jandt,et al.  Ultrasonication as a Method to Study Enamel Demineralisation during Acid Erosion , 2000, Caries Research.

[4]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Relative susceptibility of deciduous and permanent dental hard tissues to erosion by a low pH fruit drink in vitro. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Erosion of deciduous and permanent dental hard tissue in the oral environment. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  M. Addy,et al.  Dentine hypersensitivity - an enigma? A review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management. , 1999 .

[7]  M. Addy,et al.  dentine hypersensitivity: Dentine hypersensitivity — an enigma? a review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management , 1999, British Dental Journal.

[8]  N X West,et al.  A method to measure clinical erosion: the effect of orange juice consumption on erosion of enamel. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  R. G. Smith,et al.  Gingival recession. Reappraisal of an enigmatic condition and a new index for monitoring. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  T. Imfeld,et al.  Prevention of progression of dental erosion by professional and individual prophylactic measures. , 1996, European journal of oral sciences.

[11]  D. Zero,et al.  Etiology of dental erosion--extrinsic factors. , 1996, European journal of oral sciences.

[12]  J. M. ten Cate,et al.  Dental erosion, summary. , 1996, European journal of oral sciences.

[13]  J. Nunn,et al.  Prevalence of dental erosion and the implications for oral health. , 1996, European journal of oral sciences.

[14]  M. Addy,et al.  Aetiological, predisposing and environmental factors in dentine hypersensitivity. , 1994, Archives of oral biology.

[15]  D. Coomans,et al.  Rehardening of surface softened and surface etched enamel in vitro and by intraoral exposure. , 1993, Caries research.

[16]  M Addy,et al.  Dentine hypersensitivity--the effect of toothbrushing and dietary compounds on dentine in vitro: an SEM study. , 1992, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Addy,et al.  Dentine hypersensitivity--effects of some proprietary mouthwashes on the dentine smear layer: a SEM study. , 1991, Journal of dentistry.

[18]  J O Grippo,et al.  Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. , 1991, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[19]  M Addy,et al.  Dentine hypersensitivity. The development and evaluation of a replica technique to study sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. , 1989, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  M Addy,et al.  Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. , 1987, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[21]  M. Addy,et al.  Dentine hypersensitivity. The effects in vitro of acids and dietary substances on root-planed and burred dentine. , 1987, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[22]  W. B. Davis,et al.  The effect of abrasion on enamel and dentine and exposure to dietary acid , 1980, British Dental Journal.

[23]  S. Lees,et al.  Ultrasonic measurement of dental enamel demineralization. , 1973, Ultrasonics.