Opinion piece: non-traditional practical work for traditional campuses

ABSTRACT Traditional practical work for higher education in STEM subjects is under pressure from rising student numbers and adesired increase in active learning. Investing in more buildings and staff is financially challenging, while stretching existing resources affects outcomes, health, and participation. A more pragmatic approach is to embrace a less instrumentalist view of practical work in physical spaces and instead adopt a critical post-humanist approach which mixes both humanity and technology to achieve a sum greater than the parts, not bound by the limits of either. We share the experiences of leading UK exponents of non-traditional laboratories in the four main categories of simulation, virtual laboratories, real-asynchronous, and real-synchronous activities, as well as experts in scaling digital education initiatives for university-wide adoption. We foreshadow opportunities, challenges and potential solutions to increasing the opportunity for active learning by students studying at traditional campuses, via the complementary addition of non-traditional practical work.

[1]  Richard J. Lewis,et al.  Simulation of research-grade physics, chemistry, and engineering experiments in LabVIEW as a flexible template for remote laboratories , 2019 .

[2]  Christian Gütl,et al.  Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[3]  James R. Brinson Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[4]  C. Manduca,et al.  Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development , 2017, Science Advances.

[5]  Shuai Wang,et al.  Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Christothea Herodotou,et al.  Blended and online learning: a comparative study of virtual microscopy in Higher Education , 2018, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[7]  L. Gourlay ‘Student engagement’ and the tyranny of participation , 2015 .

[8]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[9]  J A DYAL,et al.  Effects of Delay of Knowledge of Results in a Line-Drawing Task , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  Wendy K. Adams,et al.  What Levels of Guidance Promote Engaged Exploration with Interactive Simulations , 2008 .

[11]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[12]  R. Braidotti A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities , 2019 .

[13]  Vicente Matellán Olivera,et al.  Supercomputers to improve the performance in higher education: A review of the literature , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Anusorn Tong-on,et al.  Simple Harmonics Motion experiment based on LabVIEW interface for Arduino , 2017 .

[15]  J. Perrenet,et al.  The Suitability of Problem-based Learning for Engineering Education: Theory and practice , 2000 .

[16]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Ben Hanson,et al.  An Application of Remotley Controlled Experiments to Perform Feedforward and Feedback Damping Control of an Electro Mechanical Servomechanism , 2007, WEBIST.

[18]  Milo D. Koretsky,et al.  Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projects for Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagement , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[19]  T. Mikael Winberg,et al.  Students' Cognitive Focus during a Chemistry Laboratory Exercise: Effects of a Computer-Simulated Prelab. , 2007 .

[20]  Ya'akov Gal,et al.  Making Sense of Students’ Actions in an Open-Ended Virtual Laboratory Environment , 2015 .

[21]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Innovating Pedagogy 2015: Open University Innovation Report 4 , 2015 .

[22]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Making projects work: a review of transferable best practice approaches to engineering project-based learning in the UK , 2010 .

[23]  Victor P. Gergel,et al.  Challenges of a Systematic Approach to Parallel Computing and Supercomputing Education , 2015, Euro-Par Workshops.

[24]  Siân Bayne Teacherbot: interventions in automated teaching , 2015, Apertura.

[25]  Ritu Gupta,et al.  Supercomputing: A scientometric assessment of global publications output during 2007–16 , 2018 .

[26]  Zhiwei Xu,et al.  High-performance computing environment: a review of twenty years of experiments in China , 2016 .

[27]  Timothy D. Drysdale,et al.  An Internet of engineering lab things , 2017 .