Classifying Perinatal Advanced Practice Data With the Omaha System

This pilot study analyzed perinatal advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) diagnoses/client problems and interventions across sites using standardized terminology. APRN verbatim encounter logs from 8 patients in a previous study were coded by both the Omaha System and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Previous outcomes were reduced preterm births, hospitalizations, and costs (Brooten et al., 2001). In 597 encounters (63% by telephone), 27 diagnoses and 8,077 interventions were recorded. Health Teaching, Guidance, and Counseling were 42%; Surveillance, 38%; Treatments and Procedures, 11%; and Case Management, 9%. Health Teaching, Guidance, and Counseling were most frequent in clinic (51%) and phone encounters (45%). Surveillance was 30% to 35% at each site. Treatments and Procedures occurred most frequently in home and clinic visits, whereas Case Management occurred most in clinic and phone visits. When coded with CPT, more than 80% of interventions were unlisted. Documentation using standardized terminology would facilitate the study of effective nursing interventions.

[1]  D. Schoneman Surveillance as a Nursing Intervention: Use in Community Nursing Centers , 2002, Journal of community health nursing.

[2]  Virginia K. Saba,et al.  Position Paper: Toward Standard Classification Schemes for Nursing Language: Recommendations of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  K D Marek,et al.  Implementation of a clinical information system in nurse-managed care. , 1998, The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres.

[4]  K. Bowles Patient problems and nurse interventions during acute care and discharge planning. , 2000, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[5]  K. Marek,et al.  Nursing diagnoses and home care nursing utilization. , 1996, Public health nursing.

[6]  B. Westra,et al.  The Omaha System: Bridging home care and technology , 1999 .

[7]  L. Glenn,et al.  Client characteristics and practice patterns of nurse practitioners and physicians. , 1999, The Nurse practitioner.

[8]  Norma M. Lang,et al.  Identification of the nursing minimum data set , 1989 .

[9]  Chris Salisbury,et al.  Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Karen S. Martin,et al.  The Omaha system : a pocket guide for community health nursing , 1992 .

[11]  B L Westra,et al.  The Nursing Minimum Data Set: abstraction tool for standardized, comparable, essential data. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[12]  M. Naylor,et al.  Patient problems and advanced practice nurse interventions during transitional care. , 2000, Public health nursing.

[13]  Sharon A Brown,et al.  A meta-analysis of nurse practitioners and nurse midwives in primary care. , 1995 .

[14]  H M Griffith,et al.  Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coded services provided by nurse specialists. , 1993, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[15]  A. Coenen,et al.  Using nursing diagnoses to explain utilization in a Community Nursing Center. , 1996, Research in nursing & health.

[16]  S A Finkler,et al.  A randomized trial of nurse specialist home care for women with high-risk pregnancies: outcomes and costs. , 2001, The American journal of managed care.

[17]  G. Maislin,et al.  Nurse practitioner services: content and relative work value. , 2000, Nursing outlook.