Predicting Regional‐Scale Soil Variability using a Single Calibrated Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity Model

Multi-field/multi-season approaches used to calibrate apparent soil electrical conductivity (EC a ) models for predicting soil spatial variability across large landscapes are time-consuming. In this study an alternative calibration approach was evaluated. The study was conducted on an agricultural watershed in Texas with the objectives of (i) assessing the contribution of different soil properties to EC a variability; and (ii) evaluating the feasibility of using a single calibration approach to predict soil variability across different fields. Of the soil properties measured, clay content contributed the greatest to EC a variability. The single calibration approach was used to calibrate an EC a -clay model using data from a designated calibration area (CA). When the calibrated model was used to predict clay content in four validation fields, prediction accuracies were between 2 and 4% clay. Accuracies were comparable with other methods indicating that the single-calibration approach was a suitable alternative to multi-field/multi-season calibration approaches.

[1]  A. Heuperman,et al.  The Role of EM38 in Land and Water Management Planning on the Tragowel Plains in Northern Victoria , 2002 .

[2]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Estimating depths to claypans using electromagnetic induction methods , 1994 .

[3]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Model Evaluation by Comparison of Model-Based Predictions and Measured Values , 2003 .

[4]  N. Kitchen,et al.  Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture , 2001 .

[5]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Noninvasive Soil Water Content Measurement Using Electromagnetic Induction , 1995 .

[6]  R. Mckenzie,et al.  CONVERSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTANCE READINGS TO SATURATED PASTE EXTRACT VALUES IN SOILS FOR DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE, TEXTURE, AND MOISTURE CONDITIONS , 1989 .

[7]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central USA , 2005 .

[8]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Determining Soil Electrical Conductivity-Depth Relations Using an Inductive Electromagnetic Soil Conductivity Meter1 , 1981 .

[9]  Peter G Slavich,et al.  Estimating average rootzone salinity from electromagnetic induction (EM-38) measurements. , 1990 .

[10]  Cristine L. S. Morgan,et al.  In Situ Characterization of Soil Clay Content with Visible Near‐Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy , 2007 .

[11]  C. Sonneveld,et al.  Soil analysis by means of a 1:2 volume extract , 1971, Plant and Soil.

[12]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Comparing bulk soil electrical conductivity determination using the DUALEM-1S and EM38-DD electromagnetic induction instruments , 2007 .

[13]  H. Domsch,et al.  Estimation of Soil Textural Features from Soil Electrical Conductivity Recorded Using the EM38 , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[14]  J. Triantafilis,et al.  Mapping clay content variation using electromagnetic induction techniques , 2005 .

[15]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity , 2005 .

[16]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Mapping of sand deposition from 1993 midwest floods with electromagnetic induction measurements , 1996 .

[17]  D. Robinson,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity mapping as an agricultural management tool in arid zone soils , 2005 .