Multi-Level Standardization and Business Models for Cognitive Radio: The Case of the Cognitive Pilot Channel

This paper examines the international, inter- organizational collaboration processes for the development of cognitive radio, which will be at the basis of potentially profound changes in the telecommunications value network, as well as its functional architecture, cost and value structure and the eventual value proposition of any services deployed in such a value network. The paper will analyze the transition in telecommunications from linear standardization taking place mainly in the domain of formal Standardization Organizations, to a highly complex and multi-layered process simultaneously involving formal organizations, informal bodies and industrial consortia. Subsequently, the paper discusses the development of a Cognitive Pilot Channel to show how innovation in telecommunications markets is determined by this complex interplay. It also explores how the collaborative process between research, regulation and standardization of a Cognitive Pilot Channel in different standardization platforms (viz. IEEE SCC41 and ETSI TC RRS) might influence the eventual deployment of such a cognitive radio technology and networks and services enabled by it, as well as the business models for it. For doing this, an exploratory business model scorecard analysis is performed on some of the different revenue sharing models coming out of diverging design choices of the CPC.

[1]  P. Demestichas,et al.  Reconfigurable Wireless Communication Systems applying Distributed Decision-Making in a Heterogeneous Radio Environment , 2007, 2007 16th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit.

[2]  Patrick Xavier,et al.  Policy issues in spectrum trading , 2006 .

[3]  Kai Jakobs.  Advanced topics in information technology standards and standardization research , 2006 .

[4]  Ji Yang,et al.  IEEE P1900.B: Coexistence Support for Reconfigurable, Heterogeneous Air Interfaces , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[5]  Mostafa Hashem Sherif.  When Is Standarization Slow? , 2003, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[6]  C. Baldry.  Theories of The Information Society , 1988 .

[7]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  The business model impact of flexible spectrum management and cognitive networks , 2007 .

[8]  Knut Blind,et al.  The Economics of Standards , 2004 .

[9]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  Business Model Implications of a Cognitive Pilot Channel as enabler of Flexible Spectrum Management , 2007, Bled eConference.

[10]  Ping Zhang,et al.  CPC-assisted Network Selection Strategy , 2007, 2007 16th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit.

[11]  P. Ballon,et al.  Flexible Spectrum Management and the Need for Controlling Entities for Reconfigurable Wireless Systems , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[12]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  When standards become business models: reinterpreting “failure” in the standardization paradigm , 2007 .

[13]  Oriol Sallent,et al.  Introduction to IEEE P1900.4 Activities , 2008, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[14]  Oriol Sallent,et al.  A novel on-demand cognitive pilot channel enabling dynamic spectrum allocation , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[15]  P. David,et al.  Standards trade and competition in the emerging global information infrastructure environment. , 1996 .

[16]  Paul A. David,et al.  Formal standards-setting for global telecommunications and information services. Towards an institutional regime transformation? , 1996 .

[17]  Jill Hills,et al.  Deregulating telecoms: Competition and control in the United States, Japan, and Britain , 1986 .

[18]  Nils Brunsson,et al.  Organizations, Markets, and Standardization , 2002 .

[19]  Tineke M. Egyedi,et al.  Shaping standardization: A study of standards processes and standards policies in the field of telematic services , 1996 .

[20]  Marc van Wegberg.  Standardization and Competing Consortia: The Trade-Off Between Speed and Compatibility , 2004, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[21]  Proposed NaiKun Wind Farm.  Draft Terms of Reference , 2007 .

[22]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  Business Modelling Revisited: The Configuration of Control and Value , 2007 .

[23]  Ken Krechmer,et al.  Open Standards Requirements , 2006, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[24]  Jeff White,et al.  Coordinating technology: Studies in the international standardization of telecommunications , 1998 .

[25]  Sana Ben Jemaa,et al.  Common Pilot Channel for network selection , 2006, 2006 IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference.

[26]  J. Hills,et al.  Restructuring regulation: technological convergence and European telecommunications and broadcasting markets , 2000 .

[27]  Oriol Sallent,et al.  Decentralized spectrum and radio resource management enabled by an on-demand Cognitive Pilot Channel , 2008, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[28]  Robert B. Horwitz,et al.  The Irony of Regulatory Reform: The Deregulation of American Telecommunications , 1988 .

[29]  Jürgen Wehnert.  Ready – Set – Slow: A View from Inside a CEN Working Group , 2006 .

[30]  Henk J. de Vries.  IT Standards Typology , 2006 .

[31]  Tineke M. Egyedi.  Beyond Consortia, Beyond Standardization? Redefining the Consortium Problem , 2006 .

[32]  Jan Servaes.  The European information society : a reality check , 2003 .