Use and perception of design for environment (DfE) in small and medium sized enterprises in Sweden

This paper aims to give an image of the utilization and perception of DfE and methods and tools within some Swedish Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. The background is the large number of existing methods and tools in relation to the low utilization in the industry. The research method has been qualitative research interviews in ten companies. Some of the material is based on a Master Thesis written by Skoglund and Svensson (2002). The education level about DfE is very low and the overall motivation for DfE in the companies seems to be low or nonexistent. The DfE method and tool utilization is zero. One reason for this lack of interest seems to be the low interest in environmental questions and DfE among customers. The number of environmental and DfE requirements are low. The authors noted that environmental improvements have been made but not considered as environmental work, e.g. weight and fuel minimization but they are driven by for example quality or economical reasons. There are two ways to get environmental improvements by using methods and tools, by specific DfE methods and tools and by integration of environmental considerations in the ordinary design methods and tools.

[1]  Sofia Ritzén,et al.  Selection and implementation - key activities to successful use of EcoDesign tools , 2001 .

[2]  T.A. Bhamra,et al.  Integrating environmental decisions into the product development process. I. The early stages , 1999, Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[3]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[4]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Winning by Design: Technology, Product Design and International Competitiveness , 1992 .

[5]  Tore Kristensen,et al.  Winning by Design: Technology, Product Design and International Competitiveness , 1994 .

[6]  George Jr. Stalk Hout.  Competing Against Time : How Time Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets , 2002 .

[7]  Belinda López-Mesa,et al.  USABILITY IN INDUSTRY OF METHODS FROM DESIGN RESEARCH , 2003 .

[8]  Conny Bakker.  Environmental Information for Industrial Designers , 1995 .

[9]  Licentiate Thesis,et al.  Selection and Use of Engineering Design Methods Using Creative Problem Solving , 2003 .

[10]  A. Kärnä,et al.  The Challenge of 'Product Chain' Thinking for Product Development and Design - the Example of Electrical and Electronic Products , 1998 .

[11]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[12]  H. Birkhofer,et al.  SELECTING METHODS FOR LIFE CYCLE DESIGN BASED ON THE NEEDS OF A COMPANY , 2002 .

[13]  Richard Almgren,et al.  Effektivare miljöledningssystem - en studie om brister, behov och möjligheter till förbättring. , 2003 .

[14]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  The diffusion of design for environment: a survey of current practice , 1996, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE-1996.

[15]  Livio D. DeSimone,et al.  Eco‐Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[16]  Frank Schlüter.  On the integration of environmental aspects into early product development , 2001 .

[17]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[18]  L. Blessing.  WHAT IS THIS THING CALLED DESIGN RESEARCH , 2003 .

[19]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[20]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives , 2002 .