LC method for the determination of R-timolol in S-timolol maleate: Validation of its ability to quantify and uncertainty assessment.

This article presents the validation results of a chiral liquid chromatographic (LC) method previously developed for the quantitative determination of R-timolol in S-timolol maleate samples. A novel validation strategy based on the accuracy profiles was used to select the most appropriate regression model, to assess the method accuracy within well defined acceptance limits and to determine the limits of quantitation as well as the concentration range. The validation phase was completed by the investigation of the risk profiles of various acceptable regression models in order to ensure the risk of obtaining the future measurements outside the acceptance limits fixed a priori. On the other hand, the present paper also shows how data used in this validation approach can be used to estimate the measurement uncertainty. The uncertainty derived from beta-expectation tolerance interval (sigma(Tol)(2)), which is equal to the uncertainty of measurements as well as the expanded uncertainty (U(x)) using a coverage factor k=2 was estimated. The uncertainty estimates obtained from validation data were finally compared with those obtained from interlaboratory and robustness studies.

[1]  M Laurentie,et al.  Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures. A SFSTP proposal--part II. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[2]  Y. Heyden,et al.  Collaborative study of an liquid chromatographic method for the determination of R-timolol and other related substances in S-timolol maleate , 2005 .

[3]  Jacques Crommen,et al.  Determination of uncertainty in analytical measurements from collaborative study results on the analysis of a phenoxymethylpenicillin sample , 2003 .

[4]  P. Chiap,et al.  An analysis of the SFSTP guide on validation of chromatographic bioanalytical methods: progress and limitations. , 2003, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[5]  J. Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Measurement uncertainty from validation and duplicate analysis results in HPLC analysis of multivitamin preparations and nutrients with different galenic forms. , 2003, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[6]  F. Xavier Rius,et al.  Estimating uncertainties of analytical results using information from the validation process , 1999 .

[7]  Y. Heyden,et al.  Uncertainty assessment from robustness testing applied on an LC assay for R-timolol and other related substances in S-timolol maleate , 2005 .

[8]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Comparison of different approaches to estimate the uncertainty of a liquid chromatographic assay , 2003 .

[9]  Philippe Hubert,et al.  Development of response models for optimising HPLC methods , 2004 .

[10]  M. Angeles Herrador,et al.  Practical digest for evaluating the uncertainty of analytical assays from validation data according to the LGC/VAM protocol. , 2005, Talanta.

[11]  F. Ventura,et al.  Estimation of measurement uncertainty for the determination of nonylphenol in water using solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction procedures , 2004 .

[12]  Philippe Hubert,et al.  New advances in method validation and measurement uncertainty aimed at improving the quality of chemical data , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[13]  Philippe Hubert,et al.  The SFSTP guide on the validation of chromatographic methods for drug bioanalysis: from the Washington Conference to the laboratory , 1999 .