Histologic grading in breast cancer--reproducibility between seven pathologic departments. South Sweden Breast Cancer Group.

Histologic grade, including tubular formations, nuclear grade, and mitotic activity, is a well-documented prognostic factor in breast cancer. In comparison with other prognostic parameters, the evaluation of histologic grade is cheap and can be performed, in principle, in all cases of breast cancer. One possible disadvantage is that the evaluation may vary between different pathological departments. The aim of the present work was therefore to study the reproducibility of the histologic grading system by distributing haematoxylin-erythrosin-stained slides from 93 invasive breast cancers to the seven pathology departments within the southern healthcare region of Sweden. The evaluation was performed blindly and without any knowledge of other clinical parameters. In 31% of the cases the same histologic grade was obtained for all departments. The overall mean kappa was 0.54, indicating a moderate reproducibility. Of the three factors included in histologic grade, the agreement was best for tubular formations and poorest for nuclear grade and mitotic activity. The overall moderate reproducibility should be considered when the clinical usefulness of histologic grading is compared with other prognostic instruments.

[1]  R. Gelber,et al.  Prognostic significance of tumor grade in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis , 1986, Cancer.

[2]  K. Kunze,et al.  Histological grading of breast cancer. Interobserver, reproducibility and prognostic significance. , 1990, Pathology, research and practice.

[3]  M J Gaffey,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. , 1995, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  H. Bloom,et al.  Histological Grading and Prognosis in Breast Cancer , 1957, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  W D Dupont,et al.  Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study , 1994, Cancer.

[6]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[7]  S. Pinder,et al.  Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement. , 1995, Human pathology.

[8]  D. Barnes,et al.  Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein in mammary carcinoma: an important new independent indicator of prognosis? , 1993, Human pathology.

[9]  A. Clayden,et al.  Observer variation in histological grading of breast cancer. , 1989, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[11]  N. de Klerk,et al.  Histological Grading in Breast Cancer: Interobserver Agreement, and Relation to Other Prognostic Factors Including Ploidy , 1992, Pathology.

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.