Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development

This article suggests that the concepts underlying participatory approaches to development should be subject to greater critical analysis. Drawing on research on water resource management in sub-Saharan Africa, and on social theory concerning the recursive relationship between agency and structure, it illustrates the need for a more complex understanding of issues of efficiency and empowerment in participatory approaches. Particularly, two key concepts are examined: ideas about the nature and role of institutions ; and models of individual action . The article concludes by identifying the questions such an analysis raises about the relationships between community, social capital and the state. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  P. Willis.  Learning to Labor: How Working-Class Kids Get Working-Class Jobs , 1976 .

[2]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Michael C. Williams.  Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance , 1986 .

[5]  J. Dwyer.  The politics of participation. , 2010, Community health studies.

[6]  N. Long.  From paradigm lost or paradigm regained?; the case for an actor-oriented sociology of development. , 1990 .

[7]  F. Berkes.  International Association for the Study of Common Property , 1990, Environmental Conservation.

[8]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Possibility of Cooperation@@@Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability.@@@Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.@@@Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. , 1990 .

[9]  J. Walkup.  How institutions think , 1990 .

[10]  P. Oakley.  Projects with people : the practice of participation in rural development , 1991 .

[11]  P. Sollis,et al.  Did the project fail? A community perspective on a participatory primary health care project in Ecuador , 1991 .

[12]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[13]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[14]  Michael Wood.  Community management of rural water supplies , 1994 .

[15]  John Thompson.  Participatory approaches in government bureaucracies: facilitating the process of institutional change , 1995 .

[16]  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy , 1995 .

[17]  R. Eyben,et al.  17. Popular participation in aid-assisted projects: why more in theory than practice? , 1995 .

[18]  F. Cleaver.  Water as a Weapon: The History of Water Supply Development in Nkayi District, Zimbabwe , 1995 .

[19]  Linda Mayoux,et al.  Beyond Naivety: Women, Gender Inequality and Participatory Development , 1995 .

[20]  S. Wright,et al.  Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice , 1995 .

[21]  A. Goetz.  Local heroes : patterns of field worker discretion in implementing GAD policy in Bangladesh , 1996 .

[22]  M. Zwarteveen,et al.  Free-riders or victims: Women's nonparticipation in irrigation management in Nepal's Chhattis Mauja Irrigation Scheme. , 1996 .

[23]  The 5% 'rule':Fact or fiction? , 1996 .

[24]  Social exclusion and anti-poverty strategies : project on the patterns and causes of social exclusion and the design of policies to promote integration : a synthesis of findings , 1996 .

[25]  E. A. Brett,et al.  The participatory principle in development projects: the costs and benefits of cooperation , 1996 .

[26]  T. Li.  Images of community: Discourse and strategy in property relations , 1996 .

[27]  A. Goebel.  Process, Perception and Power: Notes from ‘Participatory’ Research in a Zimbabwean Resettlement Area , 1998 .

[28]  R. Chambers.  Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last , 1997 .

[29]  The Paradox of Narrowing Wage Differentials and Widening Wage Inequality in Mexico , 1997 .

[30]  W. Adams,et al.  Water, Rules and Gender: Water Rights in an Indigenous Irrigation System, Marakwet, Kenya , 1997 .

[31]  N. Khan,et al.  Participation in social forestry re-examined: a case-study from Bangladesh. , 1997, Development in practice.

[32]  S. Sarason,et al.  Crossing boundaries , 1997 .

[33]  D. Mosse,et al.  The Symbolic Making of a Common Property Resource: History, Ecology and Locality in a Tank‐irrigated Landscape in South India , 1997 .

[34]  C. D. Deere,et al.  Gender, land, and water: From reform to counter-reform in Latin America , 1998 .

[35]  Frances Cleaver.  There's a right way to do it — informal arrangements for local resource management in Zimbabwe , 1998 .

[36]  F. Cleaver.  Choice, complexity, and change: Gendered livelihoods and the management of water , 1998 .

[37]  O. F. Borda.  People’s Participation: Challenges ahead , 1998 .

[38]  F. Cleaver.  Incentives and informal institutions: Gender and the management of water , 1998 .

[39]  Katja Jobes.  PME under the spotlight: a challenging approach in St. Vincent , 1998 .

[40]  N. Folbre.  Engendering economics: new perspectives on women, work, and demographic change , 1998 .

[41]  C. Jackson,et al.  Social Exclusion and Gender: Does One Size Fit All? , 1999 .

[42]  Ethics Unbound: For a Normative Turn in Social Theory , 2000 .

[43]  T. Allen.  Housing Renewal—Doesn't it Make You Sick? , 2000 .

[44]  D. Mosse.  Social analysis in participatory rural development , 2001 .