Increased enzyme binding to substrate is not necessary for more efficient cellulose hydrolysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Nidetzky,et al. Dissecting and Reconstructing Synergism , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[2] C. Radke,et al. Competitive sorption kinetics of inhibited endo- and exoglucanases on a model cellulose substrate. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[3] Clayton J. Radke,et al. Cellulase Adsorption and Reactivity on a Cellulose Surface from Flow Ellipsometry , 2012 .
[4] Harvey W Blanch,et al. Initial- and processive-cut products reveal cellobiohydrolase rate limitations and the role of companion enzymes. , 2012, Biochemistry.
[5] Liisa Viikari,et al. Inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by residual lignins from softwood—study of enzyme binding and inactivation on lignin‐rich surface , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[6] Anurag Sethi,et al. Quantifying Intramolecular Binding in Multivalent Interactions: A Structure-Based Synergistic Study on Grb2-Sos1 Complex , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[7] T. Ando,et al. Traffic Jams Reduce Hydrolytic Efficiency of Cellulase on Cellulose Surface , 2011, Science.
[8] Xiao Liang,et al. Local site selectivity and conformational structures in the glycosidic bond scission of cellobiose. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[9] Venkatesh Balan,et al. Binding characteristics of Trichoderma reesei cellulases on untreated, ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), and dilute‐acid pretreated lignocellulosic biomass , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[10] B. Dale,et al. Probing the early events associated with liquid ammonia pretreatment of native crystalline cellulose. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[11] G. Phillips,et al. Restructuring the crystalline cellulose hydrogen bond network enhances its depolymerization rate. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[12] Bruce E Dale,et al. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. , 2011, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.
[13] Baron Peters,et al. Molecular-level origins of biomass recalcitrance: decrystallization free energies for four common cellulose polymorphs. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[14] Jack N Saddler,et al. Enhancing the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by increasing the carboxylic acid content of the associated lignin , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[15] Zhiguang Zhu,et al. Cellulose solvent‐based biomass pretreatment breaks highly ordered hydrogen bonds in cellulose fibers of switchgrass , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[16] Venkatesh Balan,et al. Hemicellulases and auxiliary enzymes for improved conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to monosaccharides , 2011, Biotechnology for biofuels.
[17] Joseph A. Rollin,et al. Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: A comparison of cellulose solvent‐based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[18] P. Väljamäe,et al. Processivity of Cellobiohydrolases Is Limited by the Substrate* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[19] Bruce E Dale,et al. Multifaceted characterization of cell wall decomposition products formed during ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) and dilute acid based pretreatments. , 2010, Bioresource technology.
[20] Frits Goedegebuur,et al. Hypocrea jecorina CEL6A protein engineering , 2010, Biotechnology for biofuels.
[21] H. Blanch,et al. A mechanistic model of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[22] P. Väljamäe,et al. Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[23] Michael E Himmel,et al. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance , 2010, Biotechnology for biofuels.
[24] Masakazu Ike,et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose I is greatly accelerated via its conversion to the cellulose II hydrate form , 2010 .
[25] Bruce E Dale,et al. Mixture optimization of six core glycosyl hydrolases for maximizing saccharification of ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreated corn stover. , 2010, Bioresource technology.
[26] Jay H. Lee,et al. Cellulose crystallinity – a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate , 2010, The FEBS journal.
[27] M. Himmel,et al. Identification of amino acids responsible for processivity in a Family 1 carbohydrate-binding module from a fungal cellulase. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[28] J. Catchmark,et al. Thermodynamics of Family 1 Cellulose-Binding Modules from T. reesei Cel7A and Cel6A , 2010 .
[29] Venkatesh Balan,et al. Strategy for Identification of Novel Fungal and Bacterial Glycosyl Hydrolase Hybrid Mixtures that can Efficiently Saccharify Pretreated Lignocellulosic Biomass , 2010, BioEnergy Research.
[30] M. Penttilä,et al. High Speed Atomic Force Microscopy Visualizes Processive Movement of Trichoderma reesei Cellobiohydrolase I on Crystalline Cellulose* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[31] Frances H Arnold,et al. A family of thermostable fungal cellulases created by structure-guided recombination , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[32] Venkatesh Balan,et al. Lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment using AFEX. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.
[33] Y.‐H.P. Zhang,et al. Bioseparation of recombinant cellulose-binding module-proteins by affinity adsorption on an ultra-high-capacity cellulosic adsorbent. , 2008, Analytica chimica acta.
[34] Bruce E Dale,et al. High-throughput microplate technique for enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[35] H. Masaki,et al. Correlation between cellulose binding and activity of cellulose‐binding domain mutants of Humicola grisea cellobiohydrolase 1 , 2007, FEBS letters.
[36] B. Synstad,et al. Costs and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[37] M. Himmel,et al. Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. , 2006, Biotechnology advances.
[38] Charles E Wyman,et al. Changes in the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of Avicel cellulose with conversion , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[39] Guido Zacchi,et al. Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domains on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.
[40] M. Penner,et al. Quantitative analysis of cellulose-reducing ends , 2004, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.
[41] R. Matsuno,et al. Elucidation of adsorption processes of cellulases during hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose , 2004, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.
[42] S. Allen,et al. Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: an overview, an experimental study and mathematical modelling , 2003 .
[43] C. Haynes,et al. Carbohydrate-binding Modules Recognize Fine Substructures of Cellulose* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[44] Paul Langan,et al. Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Ibeta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[45] P. Langan,et al. X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 a resolution. , 2001, Biomacromolecules.
[46] A. Koivula,et al. Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[47] M. Tenkanen,et al. Dynamic Interaction of Trichoderma reesei Cellobiohydrolases Cel6A and Cel7A and Cellulose at Equilibrium and during Hydrolysis , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[48] T. A. Jones,et al. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 A long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[49] J. Sugiyama,et al. The enzymatic susceptibility of cellulose microfibrils of the algal-bacterial type and the cotton-ramie type , 1997 .
[50] G. Findenegg,et al. Structure, Stability, and Activity of Adsorbed Enzymes , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.
[51] J. Ståhlberg,et al. Isotherms for adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I and II fromtrichoderma reesei on microcrystalline cellulose , 1997, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.
[52] T. Teeri,et al. The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[53] D. Kilburn,et al. Comparison of a fungal (family I) and bacterial (family II) cellulose-binding domain , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.
[54] A. Annila,et al. Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose‐binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[55] C. Acebal,et al. Thermoinactivation of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei QM 9414 , 1995 .
[56] J. O. Baker,et al. Thermal denaturation ofTrichoderma reesei cellulases studied by differential scanning calorimetry and tryptophan fluorescence , 1992 .
[57] Walter Steiner,et al. Production of Trichoderma cellulase in laboratory and pilot scale , 1991 .
[58] D. Kilburn,et al. Enzyme immobilization using a cellulose-binding domain: properties of a beta-glucosidase fusion protein. , 1991, Enzyme and microbial technology.
[59] R N Goldberg,et al. Thermodynamics of hydrolysis of disaccharides. Cellobiose, gentiobiose, isomaltose, and maltose. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[60] G. L. Miller. Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar , 1959 .