Combining life cycle assessment and qualitative risk assessment: the case study of alumina nanofluid production.

In this paper the authors propose a framework for combining life cycle assessment (LCA) and Risk Assessment (RA) to support the sustainability assessment of emerging technologies. This proposal includes four steps of analysis: technological system definition; data collection; risk evaluation and impacts quantification; results interpretation. This scheme has been applied to a case study of nanofluid alumina production in two different pilot lines, "single-stage" and "two-stage". The study has been developed in the NanoHex project (enhanced nano-fluid heat exchange). Goals of the study were analyzing the hotspots and highlighting possible trade-off between the results of LCA, which identifies the processes having the best environmental performance, and the results of RA, which identifies the scenarios having the highest risk for workers. Indeed, due to lack of data about exposure limits, exposure-dose relationships and toxicity of alumina nanopowders (NPs) and nanofluids (NF), the workplace exposure has been evaluated by means of qualitative risk assessment, using Stoffenmanager Nano. Though having different aims, LCA and RA have a complementary role in the description of impacts of products/substances/technologies. Their combined use can overcome limits of each of them and allows a wider vision of the problems to better support the decision making process.

[1]  Leonard Sweet,et al.  Nanotechnology—Life-Cycle Risk Management , 2006 .

[2]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[3]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  Nanotechnology: Health and Environmental Risks , 2008 .

[4]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  “Less is better” and “only above threshold”: Two incompatible paradigms for human toxicity in life cycle assessment? , 1999 .

[5]  Kiyoshi Yatsui,et al.  Enhancement of Nitridation in Synthesis of Aluminum Nitride Nanosize Powders by Pulsed Wire Discharge , 2003 .

[6]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts. , 2010, Toxicology.

[7]  Tom C. J. Feijtel,et al.  Comparison between three different LCIA methods for aquatic ecotoxicity and a product environmental risk assessment , 2004 .

[8]  Ole Jørgen Hanssen,et al.  Linking chemical risk information with life cycle assessment in product development , 2013 .

[9]  Tadachika Nakayama,et al.  Synthesis of nanosized alumina powders by pulsed wire discharge in air flow atmosphere , 2012 .

[10]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[11]  T. Ebadzadeh,et al.  Microwave-assisted synthesis of nanosized α-Al2O3 , 2009 .

[12]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Identification of Risks in the Life Cycle of Nanotechnology‐Based Products , 2008 .

[13]  Almut Beate Heinrich,et al.  International reference life cycle data system handbook , 2010 .

[14]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Critical Review of the Current Research Needs and Limitations Related to ISO-LCA Practice , 2008 .

[15]  Rhitu Chatterjee,et al.  Economic damages from nutrient pollution create a “toxic debt” , 2009 .

[16]  R. Carlson,et al.  Relationships between Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Assessment Potentials and Obstacles , 2005 .

[17]  James R. Mihelcic,et al.  Integrating economic input–output life cycle assessment with risk assessment for a screening-level analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Confronting workplace exposure to chemicals with LCA: examples of trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene in metal degreasing and dry cleaning. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  S. A. Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi,et al.  Economical synthesis of Al2O3 nanopowder using a precipitation method , 2009 .

[20]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: review and recommendations , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[21]  Riccardo Basosi,et al.  What is sustainable technology? The role of life cycle-based methods in addressing the challenges of sustainability assessment of technologies , 2012 .

[22]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials , 2007 .

[23]  Maria Leet Socolof,et al.  Evaluating Human and Ecological Impacts of a Product Life Cycle: The Complementary Roles of Life-Cycle Assessment and Risk Assessment , 2006 .

[24]  K Hungerbühler,et al.  Scenario‐Based Risk Assessment of Multi‐Use Chemicals: Application to Solvents , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  H. Kunkel.  GENERAL INTRODUCTION , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[26]  Christian Micheletti,et al.  Weight of Evidence approach for the relative hazard ranking of nanomaterials , 2011, Nanotoxicology.

[27]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life Cycle Energy and Climate Change Implications of Nanotechnologies , 2013 .

[28]  F. Clarens,et al.  Life cycle and human health risk assessments as tools for decision making in the design and implementation of nanofiltration in drinking water treatment plants. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Coupling Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Nanomaterials , 2008 .

[30]  J. M. Davis,et al.  How to assess the risks of nanotechnology: learning from past experience. , 2007, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[31]  Jiafan Wang,et al.  Necessity and approach to integrated nanomaterial legislation and governance. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[32]  Shannon M Lloyd,et al.  The work environment disability-adjusted life year for use with life cycle assessment: a methodological approach , 2013, Environmental Health.

[33]  Ord,et al.  Risk Characterization Handbook , 2015 .

[34]  Derk Brouwer,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool: development and application of the substance emission potential modifying factor. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[35]  Anneke Wegener Sleeswijk.  Regional LCA in a global perspective. A basis for spatially differentiated environmental life cycle assessment , 2011 .

[36]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Similarities, Differences and Synergisms Between HERA and LCA—An Analysis at Three Levels , 2006 .

[37]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Indoor exposure to toluene from printed matter matters: complementary views from life cycle assessment and risk assessment. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  New perspectives on nanomaterial aquatic ecotoxicity: production impacts exceed direct exposure impacts for carbon nanotoubes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Francois Tenegal,et al.  Silicon Carbide Nanopowders: The Parametric Study of Synthesis by Laser Pyrolysis , 2012 .

[40]  Karel Mulder,et al.  What is Sustainable Technology?: Perceptions, Paradoxes and Possibilities , 2011 .

[41]  Francesca Prete.  Sintesi e caratterizzazione di nanopolveri composite allumina-zirconia , 2010 .

[42]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: state of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Stoffenmanager Nano version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[44]  Simona Scalbi,et al.  Analisi LCA di materiali ultraleggeri per il trasporto: Aluminum foam sandwich , 2012 .

[45]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  Risk Assessment and Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) for Human Health Cancerous and Noncancerous Emissions: Integrated and Complementary with Consistency within the USEPA , 2006 .

[46]  C. Hidalgo,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) OF NANOMATERIALS: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH , 2013 .

[47]  Jonathan I. Levy,et al.  A Risk-Based Approach to Health Impact Assessment for Input-Output Analysis, Part 1: Methodology (7 pp) , 2005 .

[48]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Integrating Human Indoor Air Pollutant Exposure within Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[49]  Alexis Laurent,et al.  Analysis of current research addressing complementary use of life-cycle assessment and risk assessment for engineered nanomaterials: have lessons been learned from previous experience with chemicals? , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[50]  Charles L. Geraci,et al.  Qualitative risk characterization and management of occupational hazards: control banding (CB); a literature review and critical analysis , 2009 .

[51]  E. Taheri-nassaj,et al.  Economical synthesis of nano alumina powder using an aqueous sol–gel method , 2008 .