Automated stand-up and sit-down detection for robot-assisted body-weight support training with the FLOAT

Patients with impaired walking function are often dependent on assistive devices to retrain gait and regain independence in life. To provide adequate support, gait rehabilitation devices have to be manually set to the correct support mode or have to recognize the type and starting point of a certain motion automatically. For automated motion type detection, machine learning-based classification algorithms using sensor signals from different body parts can achieve robust performance. However, until today, there is only little work available to detect motion onset. In this paper, we investigate task onset detection of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions. The focus of the current study is twofold: First, the optimal window size for the online classification algorithm shall be found. Second, the ideal sensor placement in a single sensor-setup, to detect movement onset with shortest detection delays possible is of interest. For our investigations a linear discriminant analysis classifier, basic kinematic features, and a leave-one-subject-out cross validation are used. As a result, an average detection time of 56 milliseconds (SD 111) for sit-to-stand and 48 milliseconds (SD 137) for stand-to-sit were achieved with a window size of 15 and 35 milliseconds respectively at a data rate of 200 hertz. For sit-to-stand transitions, a sensor close to the tenth vertebra and for stand-to-sit transitions close to the posterior pelvis provided the smallest detection times.

[1]  Albert Samà,et al.  Identification of Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit Transitions Using a Single Inertial Sensor , 2012, pHealth.

[2]  Xiangrong Shen,et al.  A method for early detection of the initiation of sit-to-stand posture transitions , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Marc Bolliger,et al.  Multidirectional transparent support for overground gait training , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[4]  J. Hidler,et al.  Robotic Devices for Overground Gait and Balance Training , 2012 .

[5]  Robert Riener,et al.  Versatile robotic interface to evaluate, enable and train locomotion and balance after neuromotor disorders , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[6]  Henk J. Stam,et al.  Analysis and decomposition of accelerometric signals of trunk and thigh obtained during the sit-to-stand movement , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[7]  Marc Bolliger,et al.  Adaptive position anticipation in a support robot for overground gait training enhances transparency , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[8]  R. Riener,et al.  Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  Wim G. M. Janssen,et al.  Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement: a review. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[10]  Marc Bolliger,et al.  Systematic analysis of transparency in the gait rehabilitation device the FLOAT , 2016, 2016 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV).

[11]  Robert Riener,et al.  Effects of added inertia and body weight support on lateral balance control during walking , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[12]  S. Harkema,et al.  Evidence-based therapy for recovery of function after spinal cord injury. , 2012, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[13]  Basel Kikhia,et al.  Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities , 2013, Sensors.

[14]  Faicel Chamroukhi,et al.  Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors , 2015, Sensors.

[15]  Marko Munih,et al.  Toward Real-Time Automated Detection of Turns during Gait Using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units , 2014, Sensors.

[16]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Marc Bolliger,et al.  Robust Wireless Real-Time Data Transmission for Robot Control in Neurorehabilitation , 2016 .

[18]  Alan Godfrey,et al.  A comparison of methods to detect postural transitions using a single tri-axial accelerometer , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Daily sit-to-stands performed by adults: a systematic review , 2015, Journal of physical therapy science.

[20]  B. Celler,et al.  Accelerometry Based Classification of Walking Patterns Using Time-frequency Analysis , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  A Moncada-Torres,et al.  Activity classification based on inertial and barometric pressure sensors at different anatomical locations , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[22]  M. N. Nyan,et al.  Classification of gait patterns in the time-frequency domain. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Jaynie F. Yang,et al.  Training of Walking Skills Overground and on the Treadmill: Case Series on Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[24]  Silvia Conforto,et al.  The Effect of Window Length on the Classification of Dynamic Activities through a Single Accelerometer , 2014, RA 2014.