Children's Gender Indexing in Language: From the Separate Worlds Hypothesis to Considerations of Culture, Context, and Power

In the early 1980s, an influential theory that guided much of the recent work on children’s communicative competence, the separate worlds hypothesis (SWH; Maltz & Borker, 1982) gained prominence. The hypothesis states that as a result of separated peer play in childhood, with girls playing predominantly with other girls and boys playing predominantly with other boys, the genders evolve quite different goals for social interactions and communicative styles. Although a great deal of research with White middle-class children supported the SWH, several critiques were leveled against it by feminist researchers (Bing & Bergvall, 1996; Cameron, 1996; Freed, 1996). These critiques claimed that the theory overdichotomized and universalized gender differences, paying little attention to contextual variation in gender display and neglecting considerations of power in children’s and adults’ use of gender-linked forms. The first section of this introduction articulates the origin of the SWH and the research that supported it. The second section spells out the feminist critiques. Because the feminist critiques were theoretical and

[1]  M. Goodwin He-Said-She-Said: Talk As Social Organization Among Black Children , 1993 .

[2]  Amy Sheldon,et al.  Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes , 1990 .

[3]  C. Leaper,et al.  Influence and involvement in children's discourse: age, gender, and partner effects. , 1991, Child development.

[4]  Catherine S.P. Farris,et al.  Cross-sex peer conflict and the discursive production of gender in a Chinese preschool in Taiwan , 2000 .

[5]  Amy Sheldon,et al.  You Can Be the Baby Brother but You Aren't Born Yet: Preschool Girls' Negotiation for Power and Access in Pretend Play. , 1996 .

[6]  Susan Ehrlich,et al.  Communities of practice, gender, and the representation of sexual assault , 1999, Language in Society.

[7]  A. Sheldon Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic challenges to self-assertion and how young girls meet them , 1992 .

[8]  P. Eckert,et al.  Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice , 1992 .

[9]  J. Sachs Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective: Preschool boys' and girls' language use in pretend play , 1987 .

[10]  ‘What Do Women Sociolinguists Want?’: Prospects for a Research Field , 1978 .

[11]  B. Thorne,et al.  Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School , 1993 .

[12]  S. Ervin-Tripp,et al.  The development of discourse markers in peer interaction , 1999 .

[13]  D. Spender Invisible Women: The Schooling Scandal , 1982 .

[14]  J. Holmes,et al.  The Community of Practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research , 1999, Language in Society.

[15]  The Gender of Child Discourse: Same‐Sex Peer Socialization Through Language Use in a Taiwanese Preschool , 1991 .

[16]  Patrice M. Miller,et al.  Sex-related strategies for coping with interpersonal conflict in children aged five and seven. , 1986 .

[17]  Daniel N. Maltz,et al.  A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication , 1983 .

[18]  R. Lakoff Language and woman's place , 1973, Language in Society.

[19]  J. Lever,et al.  Sex Differences in the Games Children Play , 1976 .

[20]  S. Murray You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation , 1992 .

[21]  Ganie Dehart Gender and Mitigation in 4-Year-Olds' Pretend Play Talk With Siblings , 1996 .

[22]  M. Goodwin Co-Construction in Girls' Hopscotch , 1995 .