Regulation of substrate adhesion dynamics during cell motility.

The movement of a metazoan cell entails the regulated creation and turnover of adhesions with the surface on which it moves. Adhesion sites form as a result of signaling between the extracellular matrix on the outside and the actin cytoskeleton on the inside, and they are associated with specific assembles of actin filaments. Two broad categories of adhesion sites can be distinguished: (1) "focal complexes" associated with lamellipodia and filopodia that support protrusion and traction at the cell front; and (2) "focal adhesions" at the termini of stress fibre bundles that serve in longer term anchorage. Focal complexes are signaled via Rac1 or Cdc42 and can either turnover on a minute scale or differentiate, via intervention of the RhoA pathway, into longer-lived focal adhesions. All classes of adhesion sites depend on the stress in the actin cytoskeleton for their formation and maintenance. Different cell types use different adhesion strategies to move, in terms of the relative engagement of filopodia and lamellipodia in focal complex formation and protrusion and the extent of focal adhesion formation. These differences can be attributed to variations in the relative activities of Rho family members. However, the Rho GTPases alone are unable to signal asymmetry in the actin cytoskeleton, necessary for polarisation and movement. Polarisation requires the collaboration of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Changes in the polymerisation state of microtubules influences the activities of both Rac1 and RhoA and microtubules interact directly with adhesion foci and promote their turnover. Possible mechanisms of cross-talk between the microtubule and actin cytoskeletons in determining polarity are discussed.

[1]  S. Narumiya,et al.  Coordination of microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton by the Rho effector mDia1 , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  G. Dunn The locomotory machinery of fibroblasts. , 1980, European journal of cancer.

[3]  B. Geiger,et al.  Involvement of microtubules in the control of adhesion-dependent signal transduction , 1996, Current Biology.

[4]  E Schaefer,et al.  The MAP kinase kinase kinase MLK2 co‐localizes with activated JNK along microtubules and associates with kinesin superfamily motor KIF3 , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[5]  S. Bagrodia,et al.  The Dbl-related Protein, Lfc, Localizes to Microtubules and Mediates the Activation of Rac Signaling Pathways in Cells* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  C. Turner,et al.  Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[7]  W. T. Chen Induction of spreading during fibroblast movement , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  P. Fort,et al.  Rho and Rac exert antagonistic functions on spreading of macrophage-derived multinucleated cells and are not required for actin fiber formation. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[10]  H. Breithaupt They don't care , 2001, EMBO reports.

[11]  Irina Kaverina,et al.  Microtubule Targeting of Substrate Contacts Promotes Their Relaxation and Dissociation , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  M. Schliwa,et al.  Persistent, directional motility of cells and cytoplasmic fragments in the absence of microtubules , 1984, Nature.

[13]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  P. Comoglio,et al.  Rous sarcoma virus-transformed fibroblasts adhere primarily at discrete protrusions of the ventral membrane called podosomes. , 1985, Experimental cell research.

[15]  K. Burridge,et al.  Bidirectional signaling between the cytoskeleton and integrins. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  John G. Collard,et al.  Rac Downregulates Rho Activity: Reciprocal Balance between Both Gtpases Determines Cellular Morphology and Migratory Behavior , 1999 .

[17]  R. Vallee,et al.  Cdc42, dynein, and dynactin regulate MTOC reorientation independent of Rho-regulated microtubule stabilization , 2001, Current Biology.

[18]  D. Toomre,et al.  Lighting up the cell surface with evanescent wave microscopy. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[19]  J. Small Organization of actin in the leading edge of cultured cells: influence of osmium tetroxide and dehydration on the ultrastructure of actin meshworks , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  M. Roberts,et al.  PDGF-regulated rab4-dependent recycling of alphavbeta3 integrin from early endosomes is necessary for cell adhesion and spreading. , 2001, Current biology : CB.

[21]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Analysis of the Actin–Myosin II System in Fish Epidermal Keratocytes: Mechanism of Cell Body Translocation , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  G. E. Jones,et al.  Configuration of human dendritic cell cytoskeleton by Rho GTPases, the WAS protein, and differentiation. , 2001, Blood.

[23]  K. Rottner,et al.  Zyxin is not colocalized with vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) at lamellipodial tips and exhibits different dynamics to vinculin, paxillin, and VASP in focal adhesions. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[24]  B. Geiger A 130K protein from chicken gizzard: Its localization at the termini of microfilament bundles in cultured chicken cells , 1979, Cell.

[25]  S. Halpain,et al.  Regulated Association of Microtubule-associated Protein 2 (MAP2) with Src and Grb2: Evidence for MAP2 as a Scaffolding Protein* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  Y. Kawasaki,et al.  Asef, a link between the tumor suppressor APC and G-protein signaling. , 2000, Science.

[27]  I. Nabi The polarization of the motile cell. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[28]  G M Bokoch,et al.  p21-activated protein kinase: a crucial component of morphological signaling? , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[29]  S. Aota,et al.  Molecular diversity of cell-matrix adhesions. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[30]  I. Curtis,et al.  Cell migration: GAPs between membrane traffic and the cytoskeleton , 2001, EMBO reports.

[31]  A. Debant,et al.  TrioGEF1 controls Rac- and Cdc42-dependent cell structures through the direct activation of rhoG. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[32]  J. Aubin,et al.  A band of F-actin containing podosomes is involved in bone resorption by osteoclasts. , 1990, Bone.

[33]  B. Geiger,et al.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[34]  I. Mellman,et al.  Cdc42 controls secretory and endocytic transport to the basolateral plasma membrane of MDCK cells , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[35]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Cell motility: can Rho GTPases and microtubules point the way? , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[36]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[37]  D. Webb,et al.  Differential Dynamics of α5 Integrin, Paxillin, and α-Actinin during Formation and Disassembly of Adhesions in Migrating Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  H. Varmus,et al.  Association of the amino‐terminal half of c‐Src with focal adhesions alters their properties and is regulated by phosphorylation of tyrosine 527. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[39]  T. Yamamoto,et al.  Essential roles of Lyn in fibronectin-mediated filamentous actin assembly and cell motility in mast cells. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[40]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[41]  L. Smilenov,et al.  Focal adhesion motility revealed in stationary fibroblasts. , 1999, Science.

[42]  M. Roberts,et al.  PDGF-regulated rab4-dependent recycling of αvβ3 integrin from early endosomes is necessary for cell adhesion and spreading , 2001, Current Biology.

[43]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Dot-like focal contacts in adherent eosinophils, their redistribution into peripheral belts, and correlated effects on cell migration and protected zone formation. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[44]  C. Nobes,et al.  Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia , 1995, Cell.

[45]  G. Gundersen,et al.  mDia mediates Rho-regulated formation and orientation of stable microtubules , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  B. Geiger,et al.  Actin-independent association of vinculin with the cytoplasmic aspect of the plasma membrane in cell-contact areas , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  P. Roux,et al.  RhoG GTPase controls a pathway that independently activates Rac1 and Cdc42Hs. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[48]  M. Ahmadian,et al.  Characterization of p190RhoGEF, A RhoA-specific Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor That Interacts with Microtubules* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  Y. Wang,et al.  High resolution detection of mechanical forces exerted by locomoting fibroblasts on the substrate. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[50]  S. Narumiya,et al.  Molecular Dissection of the Rho-associated Protein Kinase (p160ROCK)-regulated Neurite Remodeling in Neuroblastoma N1E-115 Cells , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[51]  T. Enomoto,et al.  Microtubule disruption induces the formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions in cultured cells: possible involvement of the rho signal cascade. , 1996, Cell structure and function.

[52]  P. Casey,et al.  Prenylation-dependent Association of Ki-Ras with Microtubules , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  Heath Jp,et al.  On the mechanisms of cortical actin flow and its role in cytoskeletal organisation of fibroblasts. , 1993 .

[54]  G. Banting,et al.  GFP in motion , 1999 .

[55]  J. Pollard,et al.  Rho, Rac and Cdc42 regulate actin organization and cell adhesion in macrophages. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[56]  M. Frame,et al.  The catalytic activity of Src is dispensable for translocation to focal adhesions but controls the turnover of these structures during cell motility , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[57]  E. Zamir,et al.  pp60(c-src) and related tyrosine kinases: a role in the assembly and reorganization of matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[58]  K. Rottner,et al.  VASP dynamics during lamellipodia protrusion , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[59]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm , 1999, Current Biology.

[60]  J. Settleman,et al.  p190 RhoGAP is the principal Src substrate in brain and regulates axon outgrowth, guidance and fasciculation , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[61]  C. Otey,et al.  Dynamics of alpha-actinin in focal adhesions and stress fibers visualized with alpha-actinin-green fluorescent protein. , 2001, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[62]  L. Lim,et al.  Rho family GTPases and neuronal growth cone remodelling: relationship between increased complexity induced by Cdc42Hs, Rac1, and acetylcholine and collapse induced by RhoA and lysophosphatidic acid , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[63]  C. S. Izzard,et al.  Formation of cell-to-substrate contacts during fibroblast motility: an interference-reflexion study. , 1980, Journal of cell science.

[64]  C. Hahn,et al.  A balance of signaling by Rho family small GTPases RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42 coordinates cytoskeletal morphology but not cell survival , 1999, Oncogene.

[65]  A. Bershadsky,et al.  Pseudopodial activity at the active edge of migrating fibroblast is decreased after drug-induced microtubule depolymerization. , 1991, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[66]  E. Salmon,et al.  Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[67]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[68]  Zhenbiao Yang,et al.  RHO Gtpases and the Actin Cytoskeleton , 2000 .

[69]  H. Band,et al.  Tau interacts with src-family non-receptor tyrosine kinases. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[70]  Klemens Rottner,et al.  Targeting, Capture, and Stabilization of Microtubules at Early Focal Adhesions , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[71]  C. Otey,et al.  Dynamics of α‐actinin in focal adhesions and stress fibers visualized with α‐actinin‐green fluorescent protein , 2001 .

[72]  Y. Zheng,et al.  Cloning and Characterization of GEF-H1, a Microtubule-associated Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for Rac and Rho GTPases* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[73]  G. Bokoch,et al.  Inhibition of myosin light chain kinase by p21-activated kinase. , 1999, Science.

[74]  J. Vasiliev,et al.  The polarization of fibroblasts in early primary cultures is independent of microtubule integrity. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[75]  R. Karlsson,et al.  Visualization of the peripheral weave of microfilaments in glia cells , 1980, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[76]  K. Jacobson,et al.  The composition and dynamics of cell-substratum adhesions in locomoting fish keratocytes. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[77]  E. Sahai,et al.  Diaphanous-related formins bridge Rho GTPase and Src tyrosine kinase signaling. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[78]  J. Meigs,et al.  Reorganization of alpha-actinin and vinculin induced by a phorbol ester in living cells , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[79]  V. Brunton,et al.  The SH3 Domain Directs Acto-Myosin-Dependent Targeting of v-Src to Focal Adhesions via Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[80]  D. Nelson,et al.  Cdc42-interacting Protein 4 Mediates Binding of the Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein to Microtubules* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[81]  C. Cabañas,et al.  Paxillin Localizes to the Lymphocyte Microtubule Organizing Center and Associates with the Microtubule Cytoskeleton* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[82]  A. Ridley Rho proteins, PI 3‐kinases, and monocyte/macrophage motility , 2001, FEBS letters.

[83]  T. Svitkina,et al.  Isolation of focal contact membrane using saponin. , 1983, Experimental cell research.

[84]  V. Niggli,et al.  Alpha-actinin and vinculin in human neutrophils: reorganization during adhesion and relation to the actin network. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[85]  A. S. G. Curtis,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS , 1964, The Journal of cell biology.

[86]  J. Kitajewski,et al.  Chimeric Wnt proteins define the amino-terminus of Wnt-1 as a transformation-specific determinant , 1999, Oncogene.

[87]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[88]  B. Imhof,et al.  Actin dynamics in living mammalian cells. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[89]  B A Danowski,et al.  Fibroblast contractility and actin organization are stimulated by microtubule inhibitors. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[90]  J. Bos,et al.  Rab5 induces Rac-independent lamellipodia formation and cell migration. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[91]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Myosin is involved in postmitotic cell spreading , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[92]  M. Aepfelbacher,et al.  Microtubule-dependent formation of podosomal adhesion structures in primary human macrophages. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[93]  B. Geiger,et al.  Contact formation during fibroblast locomotion: involvement of membrane ruffles and microtubules , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[94]  Kurt I. Anderson,et al.  Contact dynamics during keratocyte motility , 2000, Current Biology.

[95]  Alan Hall,et al.  Rho GTPases Control Polarity, Protrusion, and Adhesion during Cell Movement , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[96]  J. Small,et al.  Coordination of protrusion and translocation of the keratocyte involves rolling of the cell body , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[97]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Dynamics and segregation of cell–matrix adhesions in cultured fibroblasts , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[98]  K. Rottner,et al.  Interplay between Rac and Rho in the control of substrate contact dynamics , 1999, Current Biology.

[99]  K. Beningo,et al.  Enforced polarisation and locomotion of fibroblasts lacking microtubules , 2000, Current Biology.

[100]  A. Bretscher,et al.  Polarization of cell growth in yeast. I. Establishment and maintenance of polarity states. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[101]  E. Sahai,et al.  Cross‐talk between Ras and Rho signalling pathways in transformation favours proliferation and increased motility , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[102]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[103]  A. Martinez-Arias,et al.  Dynamic actin-based epithelial adhesion and cell matching during Drosophila dorsal closure , 2000, Current Biology.

[104]  W. Kiosses,et al.  Regulation of the small GTP‐binding protein Rho by cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[105]  Takayuki Kato,et al.  Cooperation between mDia1 and ROCK in Rho-induced actin reorganization , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[106]  A. Hall,et al.  Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[107]  J. Heath,et al.  On the mechanisms of cortical actin flow and its role in cytoskeletal organisation of fibroblasts. , 1993, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[108]  E. Salmon,et al.  Positive feedback interactions between microtubule and actin dynamics during cell motility. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[109]  R. Klemke,et al.  Four Human Ras Homologs Differ in Their Abilities to Activate Raf-1, Induce Transformation, and Stimulate Cell Motility* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[110]  B. Hinz,et al.  Actin-dependent lamellipodia formation and microtubule-dependent tail retraction control-directed cell migration. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[111]  I. Gelfand,et al.  Cell-cell contact changes the dynamics of lamellar activity in nontransformed epitheliocytes but not in their ras-transformed descendants. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[112]  P. Fort,et al.  Kinectin Is a Key Effector of RhoG Microtubule-Dependent Cellular Activity , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[113]  J. Small,et al.  Direct visualization of the 10-nm (100-A)-filament network in whole and enucleated cultured cells. , 1978, Journal of cell science.

[114]  M. Bretscher Moving Membrane up to the Front of Migrating Cells , 1996, Cell.

[115]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. , 1971, Experimental cell research.

[116]  K. Burridge,et al.  Talin: a cytoskeletal component concentrated in adhesion plaques and other sites of actin-membrane interaction. , 1983, Cell motility.

[117]  W. Bement,et al.  Contraction and polymerization cooperate to assemble and close actomyosin rings around Xenopus oocyte wounds , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[118]  A. Hall,et al.  Integrin-Mediated Activation of Cdc42 Controls Cell Polarity in Migrating Astrocytes through PKCζ , 2001, Cell.

[119]  K. Rottner,et al.  Assembling an actin cytoskeleton for cell attachment and movement. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[120]  E. Zamir,et al.  Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.