Ten types of emerging city makers

Today, citizens and professionals form different types of coalitions in order to overcome the challenges arising in cities, contributing to new ways of city making. These coalitions consist of new and emerging groups that represent an innovative form of urban insurgent activism, aimed at transformation and calling for new answers to citizens’ needs. These groups are not often categorized and captured in the particular, or beyond a general description. This paper, based on data collected in the city of Rotterdam, presents a characterization of ten types emerging types of city makers in the context of urban sustainability transitions. This categorization must enable a better understanding of the transformative capacity of these new city makers, necessary for flourishing and sustainable communities. The paper concludes that these new types of city makers generally bring value to cities; however, this value could be enriched through more participatory networks that stimulate crossovers and accelerate the transition towards sustainable futures. These approaches need yet to be developed; here systems thinking and design could greatly contribute to the development of these new systemic and participatory approaches. However, in order to develop these new ways of ‘participatory city making’ it is important to understand with whom and for whom these approaches need to be developed. Therefore, this landscape of emerging city can be seen as an important starting point to stimulate the development of more participatory approaches in city making in the future; and with that feed the debate of how these design approaches can enable systemic change.

[1]  Chris Ryan,et al.  Roles of design in sustainability transitions projects: A case study of Visions and Pathways 2040 project from Australia , 2017 .

[2]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[3]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[4]  Angela M. Eikenberry,et al.  Third Sector Research , 2010 .

[5]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  M. Mayer First world urban activism , 2013 .

[7]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Desperately seeking niches: Grassroots innovations and niche development in the community currency field , 2013 .

[8]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions , 2012 .

[9]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Elucidating the changing roles of civil society in urban sustainability transitions , 2016 .

[10]  D. Loorbach Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[11]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Cities and Systemic Change for Sustainability: Prevailing Epistemologies and an Emerging Research Agenda , 2016 .

[12]  Marc Wolfram The Role of Cities in Sustainability Transitions: New Perspectives for Science and Policy , 2016 .

[13]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Marc Wolfram,et al.  Cities shaping grassroots niches for sustainability transitions: Conceptual reflections and an exploratory case study , 2018 .

[15]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change , 2017 .

[16]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[17]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda , 2007 .