Psychophysically Determined Horizontal and Vertical Forces of Dynamic Pushing on High and Low Coefficient of Friction Floors for Female Industrial Workers

The purpose of this experiment was to investigate horizontal and vertical components of maximum acceptable initial and sustained forces while performing pushcart tasks on high and low coefficient of friction (COF) floors. Eleven female industrial workers performed two sessions of 120 pushcart tasks on a high COF (.68) floor and one session of 120 pushcart tasks on a low COF (.26) floor. Each pushcart task was 7.6 meters long and initiated once a minute. A psychophysical methodology was employed whereby the workers were asked to select a work load they could sustain for 8 hours without “straining themselves or without becoming unusually tired, weakened, overheated, or out of breath.” The results revealed that maximum acceptable weights of the pushcart task on the low COF floor were significantly lower (20%) than the maximum acceptable weights on the high COF floor, which coincided with a significant reduction in the initial and sustained horizontal forces of push (28% and 29%, respectively) on a low COF floor. Push durations on the low COF floor were also significantly longer (36%) than on the high COF floor. Vertical forces and ratios of the vertical to horizontal forces were not significantly different comparing both floors. Calculated probabilities of slipping were supported by observations of repeated slipping by some workers during pushing on the low COF floor. Ergonomic strategies should include the maintenance of sufficient COF on floors to maximize the psychophysical pushing capabilities of the industrial worker.

[1]  E A Clancy,et al.  Length of disability and cost of workers' compensation low back pain claims. , 1997, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[2]  Raoul Grönqvist,et al.  Evaluation of three portable floor slipperiness testers , 2000 .

[3]  Ciriello Vm,et al.  The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces , 1990 .

[4]  Anil Mital,et al.  A guide to manual materials handling , 1993 .

[5]  M S Redfern,et al.  Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[6]  T K Courtney,et al.  Low back pain disability: relative costs by antecedent and industry group. , 2000, American journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  T K Courtney,et al.  Disabling occupational morbidity in the United States. An alternative way of seeing the Bureau of Labor Statistics' data. , 1999, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[8]  S H Snook,et al.  Further Studies of Psychophysically Determined Maximum Acceptable Weights and Forces , 1993, Human factors.

[9]  Quinn McNemar,et al.  Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. , 1967 .

[10]  S. Snook,et al.  Maximum weights and work loads acceptable to female workers. , 1974, Occupational health nursing.

[11]  D W Grieve.  Slipping due to manual exertion. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[12]  Claire C. Gordon,et al.  2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics , 2014 .

[13]  T K Courtney,et al.  Injury and illness in the American workplace: a comparison of data sources. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[14]  Manning Dp,et al.  Slipping accidents causing low-back pain in a gearbox factory. , 1981 .

[15]  D. Spengler,et al.  Back Injuries in Industry: A Retrospective Study: II. Injury Factors , 1986, Spine.

[16]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices , 2001, Ergonomics.

[17]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[18]  S H Snook,et al.  A Study of Size, Distance, Height, and Frequency Effects on Manual Handling Tasks , 1983, Human factors.

[19]  Kodak.  Ergonomic Design for People at Work , 1989 .

[20]  A Burdorf,et al.  Measurement of trunk bending during work by direct observation and continuous measurement. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  R E Schlegel,et al.  Coefficient of Friction and Subjective Assessment of Slippery Work Surfaces , 1992, Human factors.

[22]  Raymond W. McGorry,et al.  Maximum acceptable horizontal and vertical forces of dynamic pushing on high and low coefficient of friction floors , 2001 .

[23]  M Tisserand,et al.  Analysis of measurements of slip resistance of soiled surfaces on site. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  P. H. Jackson,et al.  Statistical analysis in psychology and education , 1960 .

[25]  S. Snook,et al.  A study of three preventive approaches to low back injury. , 1978, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[26]  M. Frings-Dresen,et al.  Pushing and pulling in relation to musculoskeletal disorders: a review of risk factors. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[27]  T B Leamon,et al.  Occupational slips and falls: more than a trivial problem. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[28]  Snook Sh,et al.  Approaches to the control of back pain in industry: job design, job placement and education/training. , 1988 .

[29]  W R Chang,et al.  The slip resistance of common footwear materials measured with two slipmeters. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[30]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  Survey of manual handling tasks , 1999 .

[31]  J J Knibbe,et al.  The physical and physiological workload of refuse collectors. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[32]  H S Shannon,et al.  Slipping Accidents Causing Low-Back Pain in a Gearbox Factory , 1981, Spine.

[33]  Manning Dp,et al.  Body movements and events contributing to accidental and nonaccidental back injuries. , 1984 .

[34]  V M Ciriello,et al.  Maximum acceptable forces of dynamic pushing: comparison of two techniques. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[35]  Yueng-Hsiang Huang,et al.  Assessing floor slipperiness in fast-food restaurants in Taiwan using objective and subjective measures. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[36]  D. P. Manning,et al.  Occupational slip, trip, and fall-related injuries can the contribution of slipperiness be isolated? , 2001, Ergonomics.

[37]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[38]  S E Mathiassen,et al.  Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[39]  H M Toussaint,et al.  The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[40]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[41]  F Aghazadeh,et al.  Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[42]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  Field evaluation of two commonly used slipmeters. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[43]  P Kivi,et al.  Analysis and improvement of work postures in the building industry: application of the computerised OWAS method. , 1991, Applied ergonomics.

[44]  S H Snook.  Approaches to the control of back pain in industry: job design, job placement and education/training. , 1988, Occupational medicine.

[45]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  Distributions of manual materials handling task parameters , 1999 .

[46]  S H Snook,et al.  The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[47]  P G Dempsey,et al.  Analysis of workers' compensation claims associated with manual materials handling. , 1999, Ergonomics.