Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity in Intra-organizational Communication Networks during the Covid-19 Pandemic
暂无分享,去创建一个
Carey E. Priebe | Christopher M. White | J. Vogelstein | Jonathan Larson | E. Pahnke | Youngser Park | N. Shah | F. Amini | Tiona Zuzul | Jeffrey Weston | P. Bourke | Nicholas Caurvina
[1] V. L. Schermer,et al. Book Review: Ruptures in the American Psyche: Containing Destructive Populism in Perilous Times , 2022, Group Analysis.
[2] M. Newman,et al. 20 years of network community detection , 2022, Nature Physics.
[3] R. Stuckey,et al. Working From Home During COVID-19 , 2022, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.
[4] C. Frey,et al. Remote Collaboration Fuses Fewer Breakthrough Ideas , 2022, ArXiv.
[5] Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al. The impact of COVID-19 on digital communication patterns , 2022, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
[6] Diego Stea,et al. Intra-Organizational Network Dynamics: Past Progress, Current Challenges, and New Frontiers , 2022, Academy of Management Annals.
[7] Jonathan Levav,et al. Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation , 2022, Nature.
[8] Andrew L. Kun,et al. How does working from home during COVID-19 affect what managers do? Evidence from time-Use studies , 2021, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[9] F. Mengel,et al. Work from Home & Productivity: Evidence from Personnel & Analytics Data on IT Professionals , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[10] Duncan J. Watts,et al. A Large-Scale Comparative Study of Informal Social Networks in Firms , 2021, Manag. Sci..
[11] Pier Vittorio Mannucci,et al. Networks, Creativity, and Time: Staying Creative through Brokerage and Network Rejuvenation , 2021, Academy of Management Journal.
[12] Dan J. Wang,et al. The Past Is Prologue? Venture-Capital Syndicates’ Collaborative Experience and Start-Up Exits , 2021, Academy of Management Journal.
[13] N. Foss. The Impact of the Covid‐19 Pandemic on Firms’ Organizational Designs , 2020, Journal of Management Studies.
[14] J. Stroebel,et al. The Effects of COVID-19 on U.S. Small Businesses: Evidence from Owners, Managers, and Employees , 2020, Manag. Sci..
[15] Jaime Teevan,et al. The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.
[16] Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al. Collaborating During Coronavirus: The Impact of Covid-19 on the Nature of Work , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[17] Mary Tripsas,et al. Start-up Inertia versus Flexibility: The Role of Founder Identity in a Nascent Industry , 2020, Administrative Science Quarterly.
[18] Christopher M. White,et al. Workgroup Mapping: Visual Analysis of Collaboration Culture , 2020, ArXiv.
[19] A. Edmondson,et al. Into the fray: Adaptive approaches to studying novel teamwork forms , 2020, Organizational Psychology Review.
[20] Mabel Abraham. Gender-role Incongruity and Audience-based Gender Bias: An Examination of Networking among Entrepreneurs , 2020, Administrative Science Quarterly.
[21] Prithwiraj Choudhury,et al. Work-From-Anywhere: The Productivity Effects of Geographic Flexibility , 2019, Strategic Management Journal.
[22] James A. Evans,et al. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology , 2019, Nature.
[23] Vincent A. Traag,et al. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[24] A. Shipilov,et al. Brokerage as a Public Good: The Externalities of Network Hubs for Different Formal Roles in Creative Organizations , 2018 .
[25] Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al. Bootstrapping exchangeable random graphs , 2017, Electronic Journal of Statistics.
[26] S. Paruchuri,et al. Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra‐organizational inventor networks , 2017 .
[27] M. Fritsch. The theory of economic development – An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle , 2017 .
[28] Luca Scrucca,et al. mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimation Using Gaussian Finite Mixture Models , 2016, R J..
[29] Daniel A. McFarland,et al. Streams of Thought: Knowledge Flows and Intellectual Cohesion in a Multidisciplinary Era , 2015 .
[30] M. Cugmas,et al. On comparing partitions , 2015 .
[31] Amy C. Edmondson,et al. Team Scaffolds: How Mesolevel Structures Enable Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Groups , 2015, Organ. Sci..
[32] Clayton M. Christensen. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .
[33] Maxim Sytch,et al. Exploring the Locus of Invention: The Dynamics of Network Communities and Firms’ Invention Productivity , 2013 .
[34] Adam M. Kleinbaum,et al. Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization , 2012, Organ. Sci..
[35] Ray Reagans,et al. Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units , 2012 .
[36] Ignacio Marín,et al. Deciphering Network Community Structure by Surprise , 2011, PloS one.
[37] V A Traag,et al. Narrow scope for resolution-limit-free community detection. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[38] P. Bickel,et al. A nonparametric view of network models and Newman–Girvan and other modularities , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[39] Santo Fortunato,et al. Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.
[40] Kris Byron. Carrying too Heavy a Load? The Communication and Miscommunication of Emotion by Email , 2008 .
[41] M E J Newman,et al. Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] David Obstfeld. Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .
[43] Likoebe M. Maruping,et al. Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.
[44] M. Newman,et al. Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[45] David Lazer,et al. Network Theory and Small Groups , 2004 .
[46] Jonathon N. Cummings. Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..
[47] Ray Reagans,et al. Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .
[48] Mary J. Benner,et al. Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .
[49] M E J Newman,et al. Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[50] Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al. Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .
[51] R. Albert,et al. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.
[52] B. Grenfell,et al. Mean-field-type equations for spread of epidemics: the ‘small world’ model , 1999 .
[53] M. Newman,et al. Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.
[54] A. Edmondson. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .
[55] Duncan J. Watts,et al. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.
[56] Andrew B. Hargadon,et al. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .
[57] Mary Tripsas. Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry , 1997 .
[58] B. Uzzi,et al. Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .
[59] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Machine as mind , 1995 .
[60] R. Gulati. Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .
[61] H. Ibarra. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .
[62] B. Kogut,et al. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .
[63] C. Gersick,et al. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[64] Kim B. Clark,et al. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .
[65] C. Gersick. Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .
[66] J. Coleman,et al. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.
[67] M. Tushman,et al. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .
[68] Richard L. Daft,et al. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .
[69] Mark S. Granovetter. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.
[70] Richard L. Daft,et al. An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship between Media Richness and Managerial Information Processing , 1984 .
[71] Kathryn B. Laskey,et al. Stochastic blockmodels: First steps , 1983 .
[72] R. Daft,et al. Language and Organization , 1979 .
[73] Brian W. Kernighan,et al. An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs , 1970, Bell Syst. Tech. J..
[74] J. Borus. : The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in two Government Agencies , 1956 .
[75] Burleigh B. Gardner,et al. Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class , 1942 .
[76] N. Metropolis,et al. An Efficient Heuristic Procedure for Partitioning Graphs , 2017 .
[77] Amy C. Edmondson,et al. Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing , 2017 .
[78] R. Gulati,et al. Emergence of Social Structure: Technological Dynamism and Interorganizational Network Forms* , 2016 .
[79] Giuseppe Soda,et al. "It is How You Broker: Behavioral Orientation, Structural Holes and Individual Performance" , 2015 .
[80] Ranjay Gulati,et al. The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure , 2013 .
[81] Daniel A. McFarland,et al. Ties That Last : Tie Formation and Persistence in Research Collaborations over Time , 2013 .
[82] Adam M. Kleinbaum,et al. Matter Over Mind? E-mail Data and the Measurement of Social Networks , 2011 .
[83] N. Thompson. Group dynamics and intergroup relations , 2010 .
[84] M. Newman,et al. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[85] D. Harrison,et al. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[86] JoAnne Yates,et al. Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..
[87] Gábor Csárdi,et al. The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .
[88] W. Abernathy. Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .
[89] A. Barabasi,et al. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks , 1999 .
[90] H. Shepard,et al. Men Who Manage , 1959 .
[91] J. Schumpeter. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .