Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity in Intra-organizational Communication Networks during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Workplace communications around the world were drastically altered by Covid-19 and the resulting work-from-home orders and rise of remote work. We analyze aggregated, anonymized metadata from over 360 billion emails within over 4,000 organizations worldwide to examine changes in network community structures over 24 months. We find that, in 2020, organizations around the world became more siloed than in 2019, evidenced by increased modularity. This shift was concurrent with decreased stability, indicating that organizational siloes had less stable membership. We provide initial insights into the meaning and implications of these network changes -- which we term dynamic silos -- for new models of work.

[1]  V. L. Schermer,et al.  Book Review: Ruptures in the American Psyche: Containing Destructive Populism in Perilous Times , 2022, Group Analysis.

[2]  M. Newman,et al.  20 years of network community detection , 2022, Nature Physics.

[3]  R. Stuckey,et al.  Working From Home During COVID-19 , 2022, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  C. Frey,et al.  Remote Collaboration Fuses Fewer Breakthrough Ideas , 2022, ArXiv.

[5]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 on digital communication patterns , 2022, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.

[6]  Diego Stea,et al.  Intra-Organizational Network Dynamics: Past Progress, Current Challenges, and New Frontiers , 2022, Academy of Management Annals.

[7]  Jonathan Levav,et al.  Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation , 2022, Nature.

[8]  Andrew L. Kun,et al.  How does working from home during COVID-19 affect what managers do? Evidence from time-Use studies , 2021, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  F. Mengel,et al.  Work from Home & Productivity: Evidence from Personnel & Analytics Data on IT Professionals , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  A Large-Scale Comparative Study of Informal Social Networks in Firms , 2021, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Pier Vittorio Mannucci,et al.  Networks, Creativity, and Time: Staying Creative through Brokerage and Network Rejuvenation , 2021, Academy of Management Journal.

[12]  Dan J. Wang,et al.  The Past Is Prologue? Venture-Capital Syndicates’ Collaborative Experience and Start-Up Exits , 2021, Academy of Management Journal.

[13]  N. Foss The Impact of the Covid‐19 Pandemic on Firms’ Organizational Designs , 2020, Journal of Management Studies.

[14]  J. Stroebel,et al.  The Effects of COVID-19 on U.S. Small Businesses: Evidence from Owners, Managers, and Employees , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[16]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Collaborating During Coronavirus: The Impact of Covid-19 on the Nature of Work , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Start-up Inertia versus Flexibility: The Role of Founder Identity in a Nascent Industry , 2020, Administrative Science Quarterly.

[18]  Christopher M. White,et al.  Workgroup Mapping: Visual Analysis of Collaboration Culture , 2020, ArXiv.

[19]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Into the fray: Adaptive approaches to studying novel teamwork forms , 2020, Organizational Psychology Review.

[20]  Mabel Abraham Gender-role Incongruity and Audience-based Gender Bias: An Examination of Networking among Entrepreneurs , 2020, Administrative Science Quarterly.

[21]  Prithwiraj Choudhury,et al.  Work-From-Anywhere: The Productivity Effects of Geographic Flexibility , 2019, Strategic Management Journal.

[22]  James A. Evans,et al.  Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology , 2019, Nature.

[23]  Vincent A. Traag,et al.  From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[24]  A. Shipilov,et al.  Brokerage as a Public Good: The Externalities of Network Hubs for Different Formal Roles in Creative Organizations , 2018 .

[25]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Bootstrapping exchangeable random graphs , 2017, Electronic Journal of Statistics.

[26]  S. Paruchuri,et al.  Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra‐organizational inventor networks , 2017 .

[27]  M. Fritsch The theory of economic development – An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle , 2017 .

[28]  Luca Scrucca,et al.  mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimation Using Gaussian Finite Mixture Models , 2016, R J..

[29]  Daniel A. McFarland,et al.  Streams of Thought: Knowledge Flows and Intellectual Cohesion in a Multidisciplinary Era , 2015 .

[30]  M. Cugmas,et al.  On comparing partitions , 2015 .

[31]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Team Scaffolds: How Mesolevel Structures Enable Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Groups , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[33]  Maxim Sytch,et al.  Exploring the Locus of Invention: The Dynamics of Network Communities and Firms’ Invention Productivity , 2013 .

[34]  Adam M. Kleinbaum,et al.  Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units , 2012 .

[36]  Ignacio Marín,et al.  Deciphering Network Community Structure by Surprise , 2011, PloS one.

[37]  V A Traag,et al.  Narrow scope for resolution-limit-free community detection. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  P. Bickel,et al.  A nonparametric view of network models and Newman–Girvan and other modularities , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[40]  Kris Byron Carrying too Heavy a Load? The Communication and Miscommunication of Emotion by Email , 2008 .

[41]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[43]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  David Lazer,et al.  Network Theory and Small Groups , 2004 .

[46]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[47]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[48]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[49]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[51]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[52]  B. Grenfell,et al.  Mean-field-type equations for spread of epidemics: the ‘small world’ model , 1999 .

[53]  M. Newman,et al.  Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[54]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[55]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[56]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[57]  Mary Tripsas Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry , 1997 .

[58]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[59]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Machine as mind , 1995 .

[60]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[61]  H. Ibarra Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[62]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[63]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[64]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[65]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[66]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[68]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[69]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[70]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship between Media Richness and Managerial Information Processing , 1984 .

[71]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Stochastic blockmodels: First steps , 1983 .

[72]  R. Daft,et al.  Language and Organization , 1979 .

[73]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs , 1970, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[74]  J. Borus : The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in two Government Agencies , 1956 .

[75]  Burleigh B. Gardner,et al.  Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class , 1942 .

[76]  N. Metropolis,et al.  An Efficient Heuristic Procedure for Partitioning Graphs , 2017 .

[77]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing , 2017 .

[78]  R. Gulati,et al.  Emergence of Social Structure: Technological Dynamism and Interorganizational Network Forms* , 2016 .

[79]  Giuseppe Soda,et al.  "It is How You Broker: Behavioral Orientation, Structural Holes and Individual Performance" , 2015 .

[80]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure , 2013 .

[81]  Daniel A. McFarland,et al.  Ties That Last : Tie Formation and Persistence in Research Collaborations over Time , 2013 .

[82]  Adam M. Kleinbaum,et al.  Matter Over Mind? E-mail Data and the Measurement of Social Networks , 2011 .

[83]  N. Thompson Group dynamics and intergroup relations , 2010 .

[84]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[85]  D. Harrison,et al.  The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[86]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[87]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[88]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[89]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks , 1999 .

[90]  H. Shepard,et al.  Men Who Manage , 1959 .

[91]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .