A resampling approach to test stress‐field uniformity from fault data

Several methods have been proposed to constrain the stress field from fault plane orientations and slip directions within a crustal volume characterized by brittle deformation. All the methods are based on the assumption that the stress field is uniform in the volume considered. If this hypothesis is not checked in advance, however, the methodology may lead to misleading conclusions. In this work, a procedure is defined to check stress-field uniformity by a statistical analysis of the available fault data. Since, in most cases, the statistical features of the uncertainties that affect such data are not well known, a distribution-free approach is proposed. It is based on a simple search algorithm, devoted to selecting stress configurations compatible with available data, combined with a bootstrap resampling approach. The test results are more conservative than the ones so far proposed in the literature. When the test allows stress heterogeneities to be safely excluded, approximate confidence intervals for the principal stress directions can be obtained; otherwise, the level of stress heterogeneity present in the volume under study can be assessed. An application of the proposed procedure to a sample of fault data deduced from seismological data is presented.

[1]  H. Philip,et al.  Modern tectonic stress field in the Mediterranean region: evidence for variation in stress directions at different scales , 1992 .

[2]  J. Angelier,et al.  Inversion of field data in fault tectonics to obtain the regional stress—III. A new rapid direct inversion method by analytical means , 1990 .

[3]  G. Ranalli,et al.  Determination of tectonic stress field from fault slip data: Toward a probabilistic model , 1993 .

[4]  E. Privitera,et al.  Stress tensor computations in the mount Etna area (Southern Italy) and tectonic implications , 1997 .

[5]  C. Eva,et al.  Stress tensor orientation derived from fault plane solutions in the southwestern Alps , 1997 .

[6]  M. Wyss,et al.  Estimates of stress directions by inversion of earthquake fault‐plane solutions in sicily , 1996 .

[7]  E Carey Gailhardis,et al.  Graphical analysis of fault kinematics and focal mechanisms of earthquakes in terms of stress; the right dihedra method, use and pitfalls , 1992 .

[8]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds , 1984 .

[9]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  A Student’s Guide to and Review of Moment Tensors , 1989 .

[10]  D. McKenzie The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses , 1969 .

[11]  Z. Yin An improved method for the determination of the tectonic stress field from focal mechanism data , 1996 .

[12]  M. Wyss,et al.  COMPARISON OF ORIENTATIONS OF STRESS AND STRAIN TENSORS BASED ON FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS IN KAOIKI, HAWAII , 1992 .

[13]  R. Allmendinger,et al.  Kinematic analysis of fault-slip data , 1990 .

[14]  David D. Pollard,et al.  Stress inversion methods: are they based on faulty assumptions? , 1993 .

[15]  A. Frepoli,et al.  Contemporaneous extension and compression in the Northern Apennines from earthquake fault-plane solutions , 1997 .

[16]  B. Efron More Efficient Bootstrap Computations , 1990 .

[17]  John W. Gephart,et al.  An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: Application to the San Fernando Earthquake Sequence , 1984 .

[18]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress: A control study , 1987 .

[19]  J. Angelier,et al.  Sur une methode graphique de recherche des contraintes principales egalement utilisables en tectonique et en seismologie : la methode des diedres droits , 1977 .

[20]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .