and sheep (238 ng/day/ml) (Marriner and others 1987), but similar to the value calculated for goats (60.77 ng/day/ml) (Alvinerie and others 1993). The MRT was about three times more in camels (21.50 days) than that reported in cows (6.54 days) (Toutain and others 1988) and goats (7.06 days) (Alvinerie and others 1993), suggesting a slower transit of ivermectin through the camel's body. From the efficacy point of view, the low ivermectin plasma concentrations in camels tend to suggest that a subcutaneous dose of 0.2 mg/kg, would be less effective in this species than in other ruminant species, especially cattle and sheep. However, according to field results, ivermectin at such a dose rate, has an excellent efficacy against the majority of the camel's endoand ectoparasites (Ibrahim and others 1981, Boyce and others 1984). This paradox could be explained by the longer duration of exposure of parasites to lower concentrations of ivermectin, since it has been shown that anthelmintics' efficacies increase when they are delivered as divided doses (Prichard and others 1978). Finally, the results obtained in the present investigation may have interesting public health implications, because of major differences observed in ivermectin pharmacokinetic behaviour between camels and other ruminant species. So, it is reasonable to conclude that ivermectin concentrations of residues in edible tissues and milk, and consequently withdrawal times in the camel would also be different from those reported in other ruminant species. However, these results should be confirmed in a larger group of camels. Acknowledgements. The authors thank Dr D. W. Johnson and Dr P. L. Toutain for correcting this manuscript, and Mr S. Suilahi, Mr M. Ablouh and Mrs J. Assal for technical assistance.
[1]
P. Muir,et al.
Methylmethacrylate and bone screw repair of seventh lumbar vertebral fracture-luxations in dogs.
,
1996,
The Journal of small animal practice.
[2]
M. A. Hill,et al.
Infection of pigs by aerosols of Aujeszky's disease virus and their shedding of the virus.
,
1996,
Research in veterinary science.
[3]
P. Galtier,et al.
[Comparative pharmacokinetics of triclabendazole in camels and sheep].
,
1991,
Revue d'Elevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux.
[4]
J. Pivnichny,et al.
Liquid chromatographic determination of ivermectin in animal plasma with trifluoroacetic anhydride and N-methylimidazole as the derivatization reagent.
,
1990,
Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.
[5]
A. Dakkak,et al.
Helminthes et helminthoses du dromadaire : revue bibliographique: -EN- Heminths and helminthoses of the dromedary. A review of litterature -FR- -ES-
,
1987
.
[6]
S. Marriner,et al.
The pharmacokinetics of ivermectin after oral and subcutaneous administration to sheep and horses.
,
1987,
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics.
[7]
W. Boyce,et al.
Efficacy of ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes in dromedary camels.
,
1984,
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
[8]
L. S. Blair,et al.
22, 23--dihydroavermectin B1, a new broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent.
,
1980,
The British veterinary journal.
[9]
R. Prichard,et al.
Prolonged administration: A new concept for increasing the spectrum and effectiveness of anthelmintics
,
1978
.